Thursday, October 31, 2019

Americans' Political Study

From USA Today:
“Pete Buttigieg is making history with 2020 run, but many Americans think US not ready for gay president”

South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg has made history as the first openly gay presidential candidate to make a viable run for the nomination of a major political party, raising the question: Is America ready for a gay commander in chief?  The answer, according to a Politico/Morning Consult poll published Wednesday, is that 44% of registered voters say the country isn't there yet.  But 40% said the U.S. is ready for a gay or lesbian president, while 15% weren't sure. And voters were much more skeptical when asked whether they thought their neighbors were ready: 46% told pollsters they weren't and 26% said they were (28% weren't sure).  But many voters appear to believe they are more progressive than their neighbors on the matter. Fifty percent said they were personally ready for a gay or lesbian president, compared with 37% who said they were not (13% said they didn't know or had no opinion). 

Here is a breakdown of how voters felt about some other traits of potential White House occupants:

Female President:
73% say they are ready, 19% say they are not
70% say America is ready, 20% say it is not
52% say their neighbors are ready, 23% say they are not

Hispanic President:
65% say they are ready, 32% say they are not 
56% say America is ready, 39% say it is not
42% say their neighbors are ready, 29% say they are not

Agnostic/nonreligious President:
45% say they are ready, 41% say they are not 
38% say America is ready, 44% say it is not 
28% said their neighbors are ready, 41% say they are not

Unmarried President:
71% say they are ready, 16% say they are not 
63% say America is ready, 18% say it is not 
48% say their neighbors are ready, 21% say they are not

Vegan President:
61% say they are ready, 17% say they are not 
54% say America is ready, 17% say it is not 
45% say their neighbors are ready, 20% say they are not

As for the man who is now residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., a majority of voters said they weren't ready for another four years of President Donald Trump.  Fifty-two percent of voters said they would vote for someone other than Trump, with 46% of them saying they would "definitely" not vote for him. Thirty-nine percent said they would vote to reelect the president, with 29% of them saying they "definitely" would.  In potential head-to-head matchups, voters preferred former Vice President Joe Biden over Trump 41%-36% and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont over the president 39%-37%. Trump came out ahead of Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts 36%-35%, Sen. Kamala Harris of California 36%-31% and Buttigieg 35%-29%.  When asked about the impeachment inquiry into allegations Trump leveraged military aid to pressure Ukraine into investigating Biden, 48% said they supported the inquiry and 43% said they were opposed. But 48% also said they disapproved of how House Democrats have handled the process, while 39% approved.  Forty-eight percent thought Trump should be impeached and removed from office, and 43% opposed his removal. About one-third of voters said they would be less likely to vote for their representative or senator in the next election if he or she voted for Trump's impeachment or removal.  Overall, Trump's job approval was 43%, and disapproval was at 54%.  The poll was conducted from Oct. 25-28 with a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.

^ While this study is interesting it isn’t really accurate in that people openly change their viewpoints when asked for a study or poll so they don’t seem ignorant or racism, sexist, homophobic, etc. People who openly say they will vote a certain way can hold different private feelings (especially when they vote behind a closed curtain at the polling station.  To clear something up: America has already had an unmarried President: James Buchanan Jr. Buchanan was the 15th US President from 1857-1861, a Democrat who helped lead the US into the Civil War (1861-1865.) Many historians consider him the worst US President for not addressing slavery or the secession of the Southern US States. He is also believed to have been gay (because of his reported close and intimate relationship with William Rufus King who served as Vice President under Franklin Pierce from March 1853 until his death in April 1853.) The US has also had its first biracial (half-Black, half-White) President with Barack Obama who was the 44th President from 2009-2017.) Since most people know who Obama is I won’t mention it here – like I did with Buchanan.  I personally only care if a person who wants to be US President is qualified for the position (meaning that they have an understanding of domestic and foreign issues and what they think about different issues within that context - ie. their views on Education, Health Care, the Military, the US in different World Organizations, Unemployment, Illegal Immigration, Legal Immigration, Taxes, the US’s role around the world, etc.) Today’s US President (whether: male or female; White, Black, Hispanic, Asian or Bi-Racial; Gay or Straight; Democrat, Republican or Independent) needs to know something about everything as well as knowing who to turn to for advice on the issues as they come up. That seems like a lot for one person to do, but that is what is needed in the 2nd Decade of the 21st Century with the United States as the only World’s Super Power influencing everything around the world from Politics to Entertainment.  I can only hope that whomever becomes the next US President will fit that job description. ^

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/10/30/pete-buttigieg-running-many-say-us-not-ready-gay-president/4095045002/

Russian Kids' Study

From the MT:
“Russian Kids Are Patriotic, Apolitical and Tolerant of LGBT People — Study”

Seven in 10 young Russians are patriotic and two-thirds aren't interested in politics, according to the study.  Russian schoolchildren are largely unwilling to participate in political protests but are concerned about the environment and tolerant of LGBT people, according to a newly published sociological study on the views of youngsters in the country. The report follows the involvement of thousands of young activists in anti-government protests that gripped Moscow this summer. Russian authorities have targeted the youth with several recent initiatives, including a ban on minors attending protests, funding for military and patriotic education and a plan to monitor youngsters’ online behavior. According to the Mikhailov & Partners study cited by the Kommersant newspaper Wednesday, 62% of young Russians say they are patriots of the country.  A total of 70% say they heard about the recent wave of protests in Russia but three-quarters say they wouldn’t themselves participate in unsanctioned demonstrations. Another 67% say they aren't interested in politics. Regarding views toward members of the LGBT community, 13% of Russian youth say they trust sexual minorities, 68% say they have normal views and 17% say they have negative views. “This means that our conception about the patriarchal nature of the country is more likely coming from above than below,” psychologist Alexander Kolmanovsky told Kommersant in comments about the study.  A total of 46% Russian schoolchildren named ecological problems as an area of concern, though nine out of 10 say they believe Russia needs new environmental protection laws. Only 31% named corruption as a problem that needs to be immediately addressed. Among politicians, President Vladimir Putin elicited the most respect among respondents (15%) followed by nationalist politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky (7.3%) and Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev (2.8%). Another 56.5% of young Russians struggled to come up with an answer and 15% said there are no politicians who deserve their sympathy and respect. Mikhailov & Partners polled 1,057 respondents aged 10-18 in 52 Russian regions in September.

^ This Study shows both the good and the bad of how Russian youth view their country and issues around them. The good is that they are more tolerant of gays than the adult Russian population are (including the Russian Government itself.) The bad is that so many are not interested in politics and that is the only way things get done (in Russia or any other country.) It was surprising that so many didn’t think corruption was an issue since I witnessed corruption countless times every single visit from all levels of society (from Government Officials to Outdoor Vendors.) This study was done on Russians 10-18 years old so hopefully the Russians that go to college or do their mandatory Military Service (for Men) from 18 on up will see the reality that a child doesn’t and start taking things more seriously around them. ^ 

Celebrating Halloween

Halloween

Halloween is an annual holiday celebrated each year on October 31, and Halloween 2019 occurs on Thursday, October 31. It originated with the ancient Celtic festival of Samhain, when people would light bonfires and wear costumes to ward off ghosts. In the eighth century, Pope Gregory III designated November 1 as a time to honor all saints; soon, All Saints Day incorporated some of the traditions of Samhain. The evening before was known as All Hallows Eve, and later Halloween. Over time, Halloween evolved into a day of activities like trick-or-treating, carving jack-o-lanterns, festive gatherings, donning costumes and eating sweet treats.

Ancient Origins of Halloween 
Halloween’s origins date back to the ancient Celtic festival of Samhain (pronounced sow-in). The Celts, who lived 2,000 years ago in the area that is now Ireland, the United Kingdom and northern France, celebrated their new year on November 1. This day marked the end of summer and the harvest and the beginning of the dark, cold winter, a time of year that was often associated with human death. Celts believed that on the night before the new year, the boundary between the worlds of the living and the dead became blurred. On the night of October 31 they celebrated Samhain, when it was believed that the ghosts of the dead returned to earth. In addition to causing trouble and damaging crops, Celts thought that the presence of the otherworldly spirits made it easier for the Druids, or Celtic priests, to make predictions about the future. For a people entirely dependent on the volatile natural world, these prophecies were an important source of comfort and direction during the long, dark winter. To commemorate the event, Druids built huge sacred bonfires, where the people gathered to burn crops and animals as sacrifices to the Celtic deities. During the celebration, the Celts wore costumes, typically consisting of animal heads and skins, and attempted to tell each other’s fortunes. When the celebration was over, they re-lit their hearth fires, which they had extinguished earlier that evening, from the sacred bonfire to help protect them during the coming winter.

Did you know? One quarter of all the candy sold annually in the U.S. is purchased for Halloween.

By 43 A.D., the Roman Empire had conquered the majority of Celtic territory. In the course of the 400 years that they ruled the Celtic lands, two festivals of Roman origin were combined with the traditional Celtic celebration of Samhain. The first was Feralia, a day in late October when the Romans traditionally commemorated the passing of the dead. The second was a day to honor Pomona, the Roman goddess of fruit and trees. The symbol of Pomona is the apple, and the incorporation of this celebration into Samhain probably explains the tradition of bobbing for apples that is practiced today on Halloween.

 All Saints' Day 
On May 13, 609 A.D., Pope Boniface IV dedicated the Pantheon in Rome in honor of all Christian martyrs, and the Catholic feast of All Martyrs Day was established in the Western church. Pope Gregory III later expanded the festival to include all saints as well as all martyrs, and moved the observance from May 13 to November 1. By the 9th century, the influence of Christianity had spread into Celtic lands, where it gradually blended with and supplanted older Celtic rites. In 1000 A.D., the church made November 2 All Souls’ Day, a day to honor the dead. It’s widely believed today that the church was attempting to replace the Celtic festival of the dead with a related, church-sanctioned holiday. All Souls’ Day was celebrated similarly to Samhain, with big bonfires, parades and dressing up in costumes as saints, angels and devils. The All Saints’ Day celebration was also called All-hallows or All-hallowmas (from Middle English Alholowmesse meaning All Saints’ Day) and the night before it, the traditional night of Samhain in the Celtic religion, began to be called All-Hallows Eve and, eventually, Halloween.

Halloween Comes to America 
The celebration of Halloween was extremely limited in colonial New England because of the rigid Protestant belief systems there. Halloween was much more common in Maryland and the southern colonies. As the beliefs and customs of different European ethnic groups and the American Indians meshed, a distinctly American version of Halloween began to emerge. The first celebrations included “play parties,” which were public events held to celebrate the harvest. Neighbors would share stories of the dead, tell each other’s fortunes, dance and sing. Colonial Halloween festivities also featured the telling of ghost stories and mischief-making of all kinds. By the middle of the nineteenth century, annual autumn festivities were common, but Halloween was not yet celebrated everywhere in the country. In the second half of the nineteenth century, America was flooded with new immigrants. These new immigrants, especially the millions of Irish fleeing the Irish Potato Famine, helped to popularize the celebration of Halloween nationally.

History of Trick-or-Treating
Borrowing from Irish and English traditions, Americans began to dress up in costumes and go house to house asking for food or money, a practice that eventually became today’s “trick-or-treat” tradition. Young women believed that on Halloween they could divine the name or appearance of their future husband by doing tricks with yarn, apple parings or mirrors. In the late 1800s, there was a move in America to mold Halloween into a holiday more about community and neighborly get-togethers than about ghosts, pranks and witchcraft. At the turn of the century, Halloween parties for both children and adults became the most common way to celebrate the day. Parties focused on games, foods of the season and festive costumes. Parents were encouraged by newspapers and community leaders to take anything “frightening” or “grotesque” out of Halloween celebrations. Because of these efforts, Halloween lost most of its superstitious and religious overtones by the beginning of the twentieth century.

Halloween Parties 
By the 1920s and 1930s, Halloween had become a secular but community-centered holiday, with parades and town-wide Halloween parties as the featured entertainment. Despite the best efforts of many schools and communities, vandalism began to plague some celebrations in many communities during this time. By the 1950s, town leaders had successfully limited vandalism and Halloween had evolved into a holiday directed mainly at the young. Due to the high numbers of young children during the fifties baby boom, parties moved from town civic centers into the classroom or home, where they could be more easily accommodated. Between 1920 and 1950, the centuries-old practice of trick-or-treating was also revived. Trick-or-treating was a relatively inexpensive way for an entire community to share the Halloween celebration. In theory, families could also prevent tricks being played on them by providing the neighborhood children with small treats. Thus, a new American tradition was born, and it has continued to grow. Today, Americans spend an estimated $6 billion annually on Halloween, making it the country’s second largest commercial holiday after Christmas.

Halloween Movies
Speaking of commercial success, scary Halloween movies have a long history of being box office hits. Classic Halloween movies include the “Halloween” franchise, based on the 1978 original film directed by John Carpenter and starring Donald Pleasance, Jamie Lee Curtis, and Tony Moran. In “Halloween,” a young boy named Michael Myers murders his 17-year-old sister and is committed to jail, only to escape as a teen on Halloween night and seek out his old home, and a new target.  Considered a classic horror film down to its spooky soundtrack, it inspired eleven other films in the franchise and other “slasher films” like “Scream,” “Nightmare on Elm Street” and “Friday the 13.” More family-friendly Halloween movies include “Hocus Pocus,” “The Nightmare Before Christmas,” “Beetlejuice” and “It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown”

All Souls Day and Soul Cakes 
The American Halloween tradition of “trick-or-treating” probably dates back to the early All Souls’ Day parades in England. During the festivities, poor citizens would beg for food and families would give them pastries called “soul cakes” in return for their promise to pray for the family’s dead relatives. The distribution of soul cakes was encouraged by the church as a way to replace the ancient practice of leaving food and wine for roaming spirits. The practice, which was referred to as “going a-souling,” was eventually taken up by children who would visit the houses in their neighborhood and be given ale, food and money. The tradition of dressing in costume for Halloween has both European and Celtic roots. Hundreds of years ago, winter was an uncertain and frightening time. Food supplies often ran low and, for the many people afraid of the dark, the short days of winter were full of constant worry. On Halloween, when it was believed that ghosts came back to the earthly world, people thought that they would encounter ghosts if they left their homes. To avoid being recognized by these ghosts, people would wear masks when they left their homes after dark so that the ghosts would mistake them for fellow spirits. On Halloween, to keep ghosts away from their houses, people would place bowls of food outside their homes to appease the ghosts and prevent them from attempting to enter.

Halloween Folk Legends
Halloween has always been a holiday filled with mystery, magic and superstition. It began as a Celtic end-of-summer festival during which people felt especially close to deceased relatives and friends. For these friendly spirits, they set places at the dinner table, left treats on doorsteps and along the side of the road and lit candles to help loved ones find their way back to the spirit world. Today’s Halloween ghosts are often depicted as more fearsome and malevolent, and our customs and superstitions are scarier too. We avoid crossing paths with black cats, afraid that they might bring us bad luck. This idea has its roots in the Middle Ages, when many people believed that witches avoided detection by turning themselves into black cats. We try not to walk under ladders for the same reason. This superstition may have come from the ancient Egyptians, who believed that triangles were sacred (it also may have something to do with the fact that walking under a leaning ladder tends to be fairly unsafe). And around Halloween, especially, we try to avoid breaking mirrors, stepping on cracks in the road or spilling salt.

Halloween Matchmaking and Lesser-Known Rituals
But what about the Halloween traditions and beliefs that today’s trick-or-treaters have forgotten all about? Many of these obsolete rituals focused on the future instead of the past and the living instead of the dead. In particular, many had to do with helping young women identify their future husbands and reassuring them that they would someday—with luck, by next Halloween—be married. In 18th-century Ireland, a matchmaking cook might bury a ring in her mashed potatoes on Halloween night, hoping to bring true love to the diner who found it. In Scotland, fortune-tellers recommended that an eligible young woman name a hazelnut for each of her suitors and then toss the nuts into the fireplace. The nut that burned to ashes rather than popping or exploding, the story went, represented the girl’s future husband. (In some versions of this legend, the opposite was true: The nut that burned away symbolized a love that would not last.) Another tale had it that if a young woman ate a sugary concoction made out of walnuts, hazelnuts and nutmeg before bed on Halloween night she would dream about her future husband. Young women tossed apple-peels over their shoulders, hoping that the peels would fall on the floor in the shape of their future husbands’ initials; tried to learn about their futures by peering at egg yolks floating in a bowl of water and stood in front of mirrors in darkened rooms, holding candles and looking over their shoulders for their husbands’ faces. Other rituals were more competitive. At some Halloween parties, the first guest to find a burr on a chestnut-hunt would be the first to marry; at others, the first successful apple-bobber would be the first down the aisle. Of course, whether we’re asking for romantic advice or trying to avoid seven years of bad luck, each one of these Halloween superstitions relies on the goodwill of the very same “spirits” whose presence the early Celts felt so keenly.

https://www.history.com/topics/halloween/history-of-halloween

Halloween


Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Hero Dog

 From Military.com:
“This Is the Military Working Dog That Helped Take Out the Leader of ISIS”

It appears a female Belgian Malinois was responsible for chasing a brutal terrorist down a dead-end tunnel, trapping him as U.S. special operators closed in. President Donald Trump released an image of the only American hero injured in the secret mission to take out Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the head of the ISIS. The military working dog, whose name remains classified, has since returned to service, officials said on Monday. "We have declassified a picture of the wonderful dog (name not declassified) that did such a GREAT JOB in capturing and killing the Leader of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi!" Trump tweeted, along with the dog's image. The dog is credited with chasing Baghdadi into a tunnel during a two-hour-long nighttime raid on a compound with a series of tunnels, where the terrorist was hiding. Once the dog chased him into the closed tunnel, Baghdadi detonated a suicide vest, killing himself and three children officials said he used as human shields. Milley said on Monday the dog had only been slightly wounded and was fully recovering. The dog, which he said performed a "tremendous duty," was still in theater and had returned to duty with its handler. "We're not going to release just yet photos or names or dogs or anything just yet," Milley added a few hours before Trump's tweet. "... We're protecting the dog's identity." Belgian Malinois is the same breed of dog used in the 2011 raid to take out Osama bin Laden, the terror leader behind the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. That dog, named Cairo, helped secure the perimeter and sniff out bombs around the house where a Navy SEAL team killed bin Laden. Cairo wore a vest with a day and nighttime radio along with a two-way radio, so the dog could hear its handler -- even through concrete walls.

^ This Military dog and others like her work hard (risking their lives) to help keep all of us safe. It’s important to recognize their hard work and dedication. ^

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/10/28/military-working-dog-helped-take-out-leader-isis.html

House's Genocide Vote

From the BBC:
“US House says Armenian mass killing was genocide”

The US House of Representatives has voted overwhelmingly in favour of recognising the mass killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turks during World War One as a genocide. The issue is highly sensitive and comes amid deteriorating US-Turkey relations. Presidential hopeful Joe Biden said the vote honoured the memory of victims. But the Turkish foreign minister said the vote, which was held on Turkey's National Day, was revenge for its military offensive in northern Syria. There is general agreement that hundreds of thousands of Armenians died when the Ottoman Turks deported them en masse from eastern Anatolia to the Syrian desert and elsewhere in 1915-16. They were killed or died from starvation or disease. The total number of Armenian dead is disputed. Armenians say 1.5 million died. The Republic of Turkey estimates the total to be 300,000. According to the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS), the death toll was "more than a million". The House also voted overwhelmingly to call on President Donald Trump to impose sanctions on Turkey and some of its officials over the Syria offensive.

How did the House vote?
The resolution passed by a vote of 405 to 11. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi joined her colleagues "in solemn remembrance of one of the great atrocities of the 20th Century". Mr Biden tweeted: "By acknowledging this genocide we honour the memory of its victims and vow: never again." It is the first time in decades that the full House has considered such a measure. In the past, attempts were thwarted by concerns that it could damage relations with Turkey, a Nato ally, and intense lobbying by the Turkish government. The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, whose California district is home to a large Armenian-American population, tweeted: "The House just voted to recognise the Armenian Genocide - a vote I fought for 19 years to make possible, that tens of thousands of my Armenian American constituents have waited decades to see." He added: "We will not be party to genocide denial. We will not be silent. We will never forget."

How has Turkey reacted?
It has strongly condemned the move. Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu called the vote "null and void", linking it to Turkey's military offensive against Kurdish fighters in northern Syria, whom it regards as terrorists. Kurdish troops have been allied to the US in fighting the Islamic State (IS) group. Mr Cavusoglu tweeted: "Those whose projects were frustrated turn to antiquated resolutions. Circles believing that they will take revenge this way are mistaken. This shameful decision of those exploiting history in politics is null and void for our government and people." Turkey denies that there was a systematic campaign to slaughter Armenians as an ethnic group during World War One. On Wednesday, the US ambassador to Turkey, David Satterfield, was summoned by the Turkish foreign minister over the vote, the state-run news agency Anadolu reported.

What happened?
The dispute about whether it was genocide centres on the question of premeditation - the degree to which the killings were orchestrated.  Many historians, governments and the Armenian people believe that they were; but a number of scholars question this. Turkish officials accept that atrocities were committed but argue that there was no systematic attempt to destroy the Christian Armenian people. Turkey says many innocent Muslim Turks also died in the turmoil of war.

^ The House of Representatives is right to label the murder of the Armenians by the Turks as a Genocide. I would like to see the Senate and the President do the same. It is over 100 years since the murders and the US and the most of the world still do not acknowledge the Armenian Genocide. ^

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50229787

18 Isn't An Adult

From the CBC:
“Quebec passes cannabis law that will raise legal age to 21”

People in Quebec will need to wait until they are 21 to legally purchase cannabis under a new law passed by the Coalition Avenir Québec government. When the age limit is raised from 18 to 21 on Jan. 1, 2020, it will become the highest in the country. Elsewhere in Canada, cannabis is permitted at age 19, except in Alberta, where the legal age is 18. Lionel Carmant, the province's junior health minister, said the goal is to send a "clear message" about the government's priorities. "We really want to protect our teenagers, which are most vulnerable to cannabis," he said, adding that the increased age limit has the support of the majority of Quebecers. The idea of raising the age limit has come under criticism from some Quebec health professionals, industry groups and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. When it was first proposed last year, Trudeau warned the cannabis rules would be a boon to organized crime and make teens turn "to the Hells Angels to buy it."  The legislation was approved Tuesday at the National Assembly. Members of the Coalition Avenir Québec all voted in favour of the law, while all opposition parties voted against.

Law creates '2 classes of adults,' says opposition
Some young Montrealers say the legislation is unfair — and discouraging.  "It was nice to go to the store and feel safe," said Dawson College student Charlie Hession, who just turned 18. "I don't want to go back to my old ways of getting my product — on the street."  Another Dawson student, Mia Jodorcovsky, says it doesn't make sense to keep the legal age of alcohol consumption at 18, and raise it for cannabis consumption. "I think categorizing [cannabis] as something that's much more detrimental to you [than alcohol] is not fair, and it's not accurate, and it's sending a wrong message," Jodorcovsky said.  Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois, spokesperson for the opposition Québec Solidaire, said the law was discriminatory against young people and not supported by science. "The CAQ is creating two classes of adults," he said, pointing out that 18-year-olds can vote but won't be able to decide whether they want to purchase cannabis. The law also immediately bans the sale of cannabis candies and desserts, including chocolate. They will become legal in the rest of the country in mid-December. The legislation also includes greater restrictions around the public consumption of cannabis, though municipalities will have leeway to determine their own rules. It originally included a ban on growing cannabis at home. That aspect of the law is being challenged in court.

^ While I still do not believe that recreational marijuana should be legal anywhere (only medical marijuana should be) I do not believe that there should be an age discrimination on adults. If marijuana is legal for adults then it should be legal to all adults 18 years old and older. I think the same about alcohol (if alcohol is legal for adults then it should be legal to all adults 18 years old and older.) How can a Country/Province/Territory/State consider someone a legal adult at 18 and not allow them to do all the legal things the law allows at 18? ^

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-cannabis-law-1.5339477

Backpack Tax Illegal

From the BBC:
“Australia's 'backpacker tax' ruled illegal by court”

About 150,000 foreigners travel to Australia annually on working holiday visas  Australia has used a so-called "backpacker tax" to illegally tax foreign workers from eight countries, according to a landmark ruling. In 2017, the government imposed a controversial 15% tax rate on two visa categories for working holiday-makers. But a court on Wednesday found the levy was in breach of existing treaties with the UK, US, Germany, Finland, Chile, Japan, Norway and Turkey. Tens of thousands of foreign nationals may be owed money, local media said. The Australian Tax Office said it was considering whether to appeal against the ruling. The levy was challenged by an international tax company on behalf of a British tourist, Catherine Addy, who worked as a waitress in Sydney in 2016.  About 150,000 foreigners travel to Australia every year on working holiday visas, with many finding work in the farming and hospitality industries.

What did the court find?
The Federal Court of Australia said the tax could not be applied to citizens of those eight countries who had been employed on category 417 or 462 visas.

How the tax was imposed after controversy
This was due to treaties which required Australia to tax those foreign nationals in the same way as local workers. Unlike foreign workers in Australia, locals do not pay any tax until their yearly income exceeds A$18,200 (£15,700; $23,400). In his ruling, Justice John Logan described the tax as "a disguised form of discrimination based on nationality". It may force the government to repay hundreds of millions of dollars in total, local media reported.

 ^ I have several friends (Germans and Americans) that travelled around Australia under this program – although they did it before the 2017 tax law. I think the court was right to give this verdict and hopefully the “backpacker tax” won’t be taken from any more unsuspecting tourists and that those that were charged the tax will get a full refund. ^

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-50230702

Russia's Lost Food

From the MT:
“Putin’s Counter-Sanctions Cost Russians $70 Per Person Every Year

The food embargo is hitting Russian consumers to the tune of almost $10 billion a year, new research shows. Russia banned the import of various agricultural goods from Europe in 2014 in response to U.S. and EU sanctions.  Russia’s counter-sanctions against western food imports cost its citizens $70 per person every year through higher prices. New research into the impact of Russia’s counter-sanctions and its import substitution policies found that the costs to Russian shoppers through higher prices for food, including fish, meat, cheese and vegetables far outweigh any of the program’s benefits. Economists analyzed consumption patterns and food prices to conclude that Russian consumers lose 445 billion rubles a year in 2013 prices on goods banned under Russian counter-sanctions. Adjusting the figures to today’s prices, the loss works out at 632 billion rubles a year ($9.9 billion) — or just under 4,400 rubles ($69) per person. The research was led by teams from the Centre for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR) and the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANPEA), and reported in Russian daily Kommersant. President Vladimir Putin introduced counter-sanctions in response to EU and U.S. sanctions against Russia following the annexation of Crimea. Since 2014, the Russian government has pushed import substitution policies to build up Russia’s domestic agricultural production and build the country’s self-sufficiency in meat, milk, fish, cheese, fruit and vegetables. However, the report found the only sectors to have been successful in replacing European imports and reducing prices are the poultry, pork and tomato industries. The net benefits of import substitution for Russian consumers were calculated at around 75 billion rubles in 2013 prices — overwhelmed by the extra 530 billion rubles that Russian consumers are spending on other food covered by the embargo every year, and resulting in the 4,400 ruble per person loss. “Five years after the introduction of counter-sanctions, Russian consumers continue to pay for them from their own pockets. Although a few industries have seen a positive impact of the import substitution policy, most of them are not effective enough to change general price dynamics,” the study said.

^ Over 5 years later ordinary Russians continue to pay the heavy price and burden of their country’s invasion, occupation and annexation of Crimea and war in Donbass. The majority of Russians struggle for everyday basics and many live at or below the poverty line while the Russian Government does nothing to ease their burden – in fact they continue to make things much harder. The Russian Government sanctions on the EU, the US, etc. doesn’t really affect those places anymore since they have the rest of the world to focus on while Russia doesn’t have that option. Russia continues to isolate itself from the international community when they should be working to open their country up (74 years of self-imposed isolation by the Communist Dictatorship and the Soviet Union’s collapse proved that the country and the people need the world more than the world needs them.) While I feel sorry for the sacrifice the ordinary Russians suffer everyday because of their own government’s actions it is up to the Russians themselves to fix things. ^

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/10/29/putins-counter-sanctions-cost-70-person-a67947

Germans Want Turks Out

From the DW:
“Majority of Germans want Turkey kicked out of NATO: survey”

A new survey shows that 58% of Germans want Turkey expelled from NATO over the recent military offensive in Syria. There is even stronger German support for economic sanctions and export bans against the country. A majority of Germans believe that Turkey should be expelled from NATO over Ankara's military offensive in northern Syria that began in October, according to a survey released on Tuesday. The YouGov survey, commissioned by news agency dpa, interviewed over 2,000 adult Germans between October 25 and 28 and found that that 58% believe Turkey should be removed from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the intergovernmental military alliance of 29 European and North American countries. Only 18% were against the idea. A larger proportion of Germans wanted the German government to take a tougher stance against Turkey, with 61% in favor of economic sanctions against President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's country while 69% supported a complete ban on arms exports. UN sources say over 200,000 people have been internally displaced in Syria's northeast since Turkey launched its offensive on October 9. So far, the border town of Ras al-Ayn has paid the highest toll in the wake of a joint attack by Turkish militias and airstrikes. The city will remain under Turkish control following a deal struck in Sochi between Russia and Turkey.

No process for NATO expulsion
The German government has limited arms sales to Turkey since Erdogan launched the military offensive in northern Syria on October 9 — but there is no total ban on arms sales to the country, as previously vowed by German Chancellor Angela Merkel. While NATO's founding charter allows for a member to quit the military alliance, there is no mechanism that spells out how a country can be booted out by other states in the alliance. Removing a country from NATO would be a complicated and lengthy process that would need the approval of, and ratification by, all member countries. In Germany, many politicians from the Left party have also called for Turkey's expulsion, and the acting chairman of the center-left SPD parliamentary group, Rolf Mützenich, has similarly called Turkey's membership into question. However, former German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel told Germany's daily Tagesspiegel that expelling Turkey from NATO would lead to a "new major security risk at the EU's eastern border." Additionally, at least week's NATO meeting, members emphasized Turkey's strategic importance as a bridge between East and West. Turkey also has the second largest army in NATO, after the US, making it a significant contributor to the defense alliance's military capabilities. Tensions between Ankara and the NATO partners have steadily increased in recent months, such as when Ankara purchased and began receiving the Russian-made S-400 missile system earlier this summer. 

^ Germany (and every other country) needs to take a stand against the Turkish invasion of Syria and their war against the Kurds there. NATO should make an official statement against Turkey’s action, but of course they won’t. I don’t see Turkey (or any other country) getting kicked-out of NATO. I am curious to know if the majority of Germans want Turkey out of NATO solely because of Turkey’s recent invasion or because they are against all the Turks living and working in Germany. I think it is the latter. In the end Turkey is being Russia’s lackey and doing it’s bidding in Syria (and Russia is standing by while Turkey goes after the innocent Kurds.) ^

Political Repression Day

Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Political Repressions

Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Political Repressions (Russian: День памяти жертв политических репрессий), is an annual day of remembrance for victims of political repression in the Soviet Union.  Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Political Repressions has been commemorated on October 30, since 1991, when the Supreme Soviet of Russia officially established 30 October as the Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Political Repressions. This day is also officially a public holiday in the Russian Federation. 

Traditional meeting places since 1991
Moscow 
Lubyanka Square by the Solovetsky Stone in front of the Polytechnial Museum on October 29 (not October 30!). Russian human rights activists offered to commemorate the victims of communist terror in the City of Moscow near the Solovetsky Stone not on the officially settled by Russian government October 30 but on the unofficial October 29 to be independent from the state ceremonies. The annual meeting on the October 29 near the Solovetsky Stone is called "Return of the names" (Russian: Возвращение имён) because participants read lists of the victims of communist terror.

Saint Petersburg :  Levashovo Memorial Cemetery

Petrozavodsk (Karelia) :    Gratsky Churchyard 

Pskov: Krasny Bor Forest

Perm:  Perm-36 Kuchino village, Chusovoy district,  Memorial of the Victims of Political Repression in Yagoshikha memorial cemetery, Perm

Samara:   Gagarin Park

North Caucasus:
The nine republics of the North Caucasus suffered under Stalin, most notably during the deportation of entire nations: the Balkar and Karachay in 1937; the Chechen and Ingush in 1944, during the Great Patriotic War.  The wartime deportation of the Chechen nation to Central Asia was marked every year since the 1991 Decree of Rehabilitation of Repressed Nations until 2016 when the Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov prohibited such ceremonies.

Yekaterinburg:  Memorial of the Victims of Political Repression

Tyumen:   Courtyard of the former NKVD building

Magadan:  The Mask of Grief (sculptor, Ernst Neizvestny)

Origins among 1970s political prisoners:
The commemoration is held on the date of the Day of the Political Prisoner in the USSR, an initiative in 1974 by imprisoned Soviet dissidents, led by Kronid Lyubarsky for the recognition of inmates' status as political prisoners. This official date, introduced in April 1991, has gradually been adopted all over Russia as a Day of Remembrance for those "repressed" (i.e. arrested, exiled, sent to the camps or shot) during the collectivisation of agriculture (1927-1933), in the forced-labour camps of the Gulag, and shot in their tens of thousands during the Great Terror of 1937-1938. This year, for instance, such a ceremony was held by the Solovetsky Stone in St Petersburg and at the memorial cemeteries created at the killing fields of the late 1930s, e.g. Krasny Bor near Petrozavodsk and Butovo in southern Moscow.  As new political prisoners appear in Putin's Russia, there have been objections to the appropriation by the State of an unofficial day of protest, that started among dissidents in camps for "political" offenders. Even a separation between the two, with the emergence of the unofficial "Restoring the Names" ceremony, has not satisfied all critics.

"Return of the names", 2007 to present:
Since 2007 Memorial has organised a day-long ceremony "Restoring the Names" every 29 October on the eve of the official Day of Remembrance in Moscow.. In 2017, the contrast between the official and unofficial days of commemoration in the Russian capital, and the style in which they were held was particularly striking. On Sunday 29 October 2017, 5,286 people attended the Restoring the Names ceremony at the Solovki Stone a short distance from FSB (NKVD) headquarters on Lubyanka Square, where over one thousand read aloud names of those killed by the regime in Moscow during Stalin's era.  The next day, Monday 30 October 2017, the Wall of Grief (designer Georgy Frangulyan), a massive new monument to the Victims of Political Repression, was opened on Sakharov Avenue by President Vladimir Putin and Patriarch Kirill of the Russian Orthodox Church. The low-key ceremony was attended by one hundred people. Among them were: elderly relatives of those repressed in the Stalin period; members of the committee that judged several hundred entries in a competition to design the new memorial (Ludmila Alexeyeva, Natalya Solzhenitsyn, Roman Romanov); and human rights officials from the presidential administration -- Mikhail Fedotov, Tatiana Moskalkova and Vladimir Lukin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_Remembrance_of_the_Victims_of_Political_Repressions

DRVPR


Monday, October 28, 2019

Another Extension

From the BBC:
“Brexit: European leaders agree extension to 31 January”

EU leaders have agreed in principle to extend Brexit until 31 January 2020 - meaning the UK will not leave as planned on Thursday. EU Council President Donald Tusk said it was a "flextension" - meaning the UK could leave before the deadline if a deal was approved by Parliament.  It comes as MPs prepare to vote on proposals by Boris Johnson for an early general election on 12 December.  The SNP and Lib Dems have also proposed an election on 9 December.  A No 10 source said the government would introduce a bill "almost identical" to the Lib Dem/SNP option on Tuesday if Labour voted their plan down later, and "we will have a pre-Christmas election anyway".  The UK was due to leave the EU on Thursday, but Mr Johnson was required to request an extension after Parliament failed to agree a Brexit deal.  The prime minister had repeatedly said the UK would leave on 31 October deadline with or without a deal, but the law - known as the Benn Act - requires him to accept the EU's extension offer. Mr Johnson is trying to persuade MPs to agree to a new timetable for his Brexit deal legislation and an election on Thursday 12 December.  The Lib Dem/SNP plan does not include a new timetable for his legislation - the Withdrawal Agreement Bill. They want the 9 December because it would not leave enough time for the bill to become law before Parliament is dissolved - which must happen a minimum of 25 working days before an election. The BBC's political editor, Laura Kuenssberg, said it was not clear whether the government would stick to 9 December, which is a Monday, but the move implied ministers would "give up [an] attempt to get the bill through". It was also not clear whether the government's "almost identical" bill would be amendable, allowing MPs to vote on issues like a customs union or another referendum. But the BBC's assistant political editor, Norman Smith, said Mr Johnson's "do or die" pledge to leave by 31 October was now dead, and with many seeing this extension as no-deal being taken off the table, pressure will grow for MPs to make a decision about an election.  Boris Johnson wants an election to be held on 12 December  Labour MPs are expected to abstain in the Commons vote on a 12 December election. It comes as government figures showed a surge in voter registrations, with nearly two million registering in the past eight weeks. Over half of the applications - 58% - were from voters aged 34 or under, compared to just 7% for those over 65.  The swell coincided with Mr Johnson's first proposal, in early September, for a snap election.  The EU has finally announced its informal approval of a new Brexit extension - but what an excruciatingly long and confusing political dance to get there. And the dance is not over yet. To become a formal offer, the Brexit extension still needs to be accepted by UK PM Boris Johnson. This is EU law and an unavoidable part of the procedure.  But how uncomfortable for the prime minister who sought to distance himself as much as possible from the extension, previously promising that he would rather die in a ditch than request one. The EU is also attaching some extra wording to the extension - including a reminder for the UK that, until it leaves, it remains a fully paid up member of the EU, including all the rights and obligations that go along with membership. After the extension has been signed off this week, Brussels will watch, arms folded from the sidelines as the next moves are decided in Westminster.  Downing Street said Mr Johnson had not yet seen the EU's response to his request for a Brexit delay, but would respond "once he has seen the detail". His official spokesman added: "His view has not changed. Parliament should not have put the UK in this position and we should be leaving on 31 October." Once the UK has agreed to the extension, Mr Tusk will formalise it through a written procedure among the 27 other EU nations. MPs are due to vote on the prime minister's election call after 19:00 GMT. Labour has repeatedly said it will not back an early general election until a no-deal Brexit is taken off the table.  The SNP also said it would block the government's election attempt. But it has broken with the Labour position and joined forces with the Liberal Democrats to push for an election on 9 December. Their bill would tweak the 2011 Fixed-term Parliaments Act - the law which sets the time-frame for elections. If passed, it would enable an election to take place with only a majority of one, rather than two-thirds of MPs.  It would also set the election date in stone and rule out any chance of the PM altering the date after MPs had voted, which he could theoretically do under the current legislation.  The SNP's Westminster leader, Ian Blackford, said they would then fight an election "on the basis" of stopping Brexit.  He welcomed the extension from the EU, telling the BBC: "There is a responsibility on all of us to make sure we use that time to get out of the Brexit mess we are in and to get out of the impasse everybody is fed up of being in." Lib Dem MP Chuka Umunna claimed the plan would also prevent the prime minister "ramming through" his Brexit bill, which the Lib Dems oppose, and changing the date of an election until after the UK had left the EU. His party leader, Jo Swinson, added: "We will keep fighting for a People's Vote, but unless Labour wholeheartedly back it then a general election is the only way we can use this extension to stop Brexit." But Labour Party Chairman Ian Lavery accused the Lib Dems of "getting into bed with the no-deal Brexit Conservatives and forgetting their chums" in the People's Vote campaign. The leader of The Independent Group for Change, former Conservative MP Anna Soubry, sent an email to her party's supporters accusing the SNP and Lib Dems of "turning their backs" on the People's Vote. "This cross-party campaign has always been clear that a People's Vote must come before any general election," she wrote.  "I am sorry to say that old style, selfish, tribal party politics is at play."  The Independent Group for Change has five MPs. Plaid Cymru, which has four MPs, said another referendum, rather than an election, was the "clearest way to end the Brexit chaos". 

^ At this point Brexit has gone from a hot mess to a joke. The UK (although they aren’t very united) has already lost one Prime Minister over their inability to bring a Brexit deal and it looks like they may lose another one in a month or two. I personally believe the UK needs to either hold a 2nd referendum on whether to leave the EU or not (after all these years of nonsense) or the UK will leave with a no-deal ^

Disabled Discrimination

From Forbes:
“The Truth Of Disability Employment That No One Talks About”

October is National Disability Employment Awareness Month, and it’s about time to discuss the staggering unemployment and sub-minimum pay rates among the disability community. According to data obtained by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the employment-population ratio for people with disabilities was 19.1% in 2018, compared to 65.9% for people without disabilities. Although the lower rate among people with disabilities reflects, in part, the age profile of the population — older people are less likely to be employed — across all age groups, people with disabilities were much less likely to be employed than their non-disabled peers. Out of the small population of people with disabilities who are hired, many receive sub-minimum wages. In recent years, there have been reports of an estimated 420,000 individuals with disabilities who have been paid an average of just $2.15 per hour.

The reason that employers can give such low wages is due to a loophole in the 1938 Fair Labors Standards Act. There’s a cause that allows any firm with a 14(c) certificate to pay out wages based on productivity or ability, even at rates below the minimum wage. These wages have been recorded to be as low as three cents per hour. Employers justify these sub-minimum-wages by saying they’re providing the workers with vocational training and jobs for those who otherwise never find one. These jobs are part of “community rehabilitation programs,” or what is sometimes called “sheltered workshops.” Such programs are comprised of a mix of nonprofit and private firms, and they receive both federal and private contracts that allow them to use the labor of disabled workers. At such jobs, employees often do piecemeal work, which is often referred to as the eight Fs of disability employment: food, filth, fetching, folding, filing, flower, festive and friendly.  Many community rehabilitation programs claim to have the best interest of people with disabilities, but their actions say otherwise. For example, Rock River Valley Self Help Enterprises, an Illinois nonprofit, billed itself as a vocational training program for people with disabilities. But it primarily operated as a subcontractor for local factories, providing menial tasks to workers with developmental disabilities, such as scraping debris from metal casts. 

Cheryl Bates-Harris, a senior advocacy specialist at the National Disability Rights Network, describes the employment programs as “a bridge to nowhere,” since disabled people often become trapped in these career paths that don’t lead to anywhere or anything.  Sheltered workshops undoubtedly reinforce the dangerous notion that disabled people must be isolated and kept from society, whether to protect them or protect others from them. This population too often gets ignored in discussions of fair wages and workplace diversity and inclusion. It is as if they can be silenced if they are not seen, which feeds into the vicious cycle of disabled people being treated like second-class citizens. According to a 2018 report by the National Council on Disabilities, the ten most extensive sheltered workshops had combined annual revenue of $523 million, and the CEO of the biggest sheltered workshop received a salary of $1.1 million while employing 1,790 sub-minimum wage workers. It is alarming to think that a law that was passed over 80 years ago still dictates the livelihood of people with disabilities. This attests to the fact that societal and political perceptions of disability haven’t evolved throughout the decades. 

^ I’ve written about this social, political and economical discrimination of the disabled many times over the years. This article gives more updated statistics. The more awareness of this official and legal disabled discrimination  - sanctioned by the Federal Government -  the more people will tell their elected officials in Washington that they do not agree with this practice and that the law needs to be removed so that the disabled get paid the same amount as the non-disabled no matter what job they do. ^

https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahkim/2019/10/24/sub-minimum-wages-disability/#59b782c6c22b

Vladimir Bukovsky

From the BBC:
“Vladimir Bukovsky: Soviet-era dissident dies in Cambridge”


A leading Soviet-era dissident and Russian human rights campaigner, Vladimir Bukovsky, has died at a Cambridge hospital at the age of 76. Bukovsky had a heart attack on Sunday evening after ailing for several years. He became a prominent Soviet dissident in the early 1960s and was soon after declared mentally ill. That avoided the inconvenience of a trial, and Bukovsky would spend the next 12 years, on and off, in psychiatric clinics and prison camps. In 1971, between prison sentences, Bukovsky helped smuggle to the West the psychiatric hospital records of six well-known dissidents - exposing a Soviet practice of declaring dissidents mentally ill in order to detain and discredit them, rather than have them labelled as political prisoners. Then in 1976 Bukovsky was expelled to the West, in exchange for the imprisoned Chilean Communist Party leader Luis Corvalán. He settled in Cambridge in the UK. Living in the UK, Bukovsky continued writing and campaigning against the Soviet government and was a fierce critic of current Russian President Vladimir Putin. He wrote a best-selling memoir, To Build a Castle, and later analysed thousands of pages of top-secret Soviet archives that he had stolen in 1992, according to his official website. In 2015, he was charged in the UK with creating and possessing indecent images of children. He denied the charges and was later ruled too ill to stand trial. In December 2006 Bukovsky told the BBC it was "clear" that the Russian authorities were behind the poisoning of Putin critic Alexander Litvinenko, who had ingested radioactive polonium-210 in London the previous month. A British public inquiry concluded in 2016 that President Putin - a KGB officer in Soviet times - had probably approved the assassination. The inquiry report said Litvinenko - a Russian ex-secret service officer - developed a "very strong" friendship with Bukovsky, and their long discussions had helped shape Litvinenko's political views. Bukovsky had talked to him at length about Soviet KGB repression in the 20th Century. Back in 1974, the celebrated novelist Vladimir Nabokov had praised Bukovsky's courage as a dissident in a letter to The Observer.  "Bukovsky's heroic speech to the court in defence of freedom, and his five years of martyrdom in a despicable psychiatric jail will be remembered long after the torturers he defied have rotted away," Nabokov wrote.  The anti-Putin punk band Pussy Riot say they were inspired by Bukovsky as someone "undeterred by fear" of state retaliation. In 1978, after his expulsion to the West, Bukovsky read extracts from his autobiography on the BBC Russian Service.  In 2014 he explained what motivated his struggle against Soviet repression:  "All of us dissidents said that politics must be moral. And we didn't arise as a political movement. We were a moral movement. Our basic impulse was not to transform Russia, but simply not to be a participant in crime. Not to become part of the regime. That was the most powerful motivation."

^ It was dissidents like Bukovsky who worked both inside and outside the Soviet Union to show the crimes of the Communist Dictatorship. The men and women like Bukovsky still haven’t received the praise they are due within Russia (not surprising since the majority of the former Communist officials are still in office) but the rest of the world knows and cares about the role of the Soviet dissidents. ^

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50206084

Hill Out

From the BBC:
“Katie Hill: US congresswoman resigns amid affair allegations”

US lawmaker Katie Hill has announced her resignation from Congress, following allegations that she had an affair with a Capitol Hill aide. The California Democrat, who has denied the claim, said she was stepping down with a "broken heart".  "I believe it is the best thing for my constituents, my community, and our country," she wrote on Twitter. The resignation came days after she was placed under investigation by the House of Representatives Ethics Committee.

Why is there an investigation?
The ethics committee launched an inquiry after conservative blog RedState reported allegations that Ms Hill had an affair with one of her congressional aides, a man.  The same blog separately reported claims that Ms Hill, who is bisexual, had also engaged in a three-way consensual romance with a female campaign staff member and her husband. It published naked images of the politician.  She has asked police to investigate the nude photos being published online. Ms Hill, 32, has denied having an affair with her aide, which would be a possible violation of House rules. In a statement announcing the investigation, the ethics committee noted that the opening of an inquiry did not mean "that any violation has occurred". Hours before the congressional inquiry was launched on Wednesday, Ms Hill sent a letter to supporters acknowledging a "relationship" with a female 2018 campaign staff member. She described that affair as "inappropriate". The relationship that Ms Hill acknowledged took place before she was elected, so it fell outside congressional rules on personal relationships. 

What did she say?
In her resignation letter on Sunday, Ms Hill said stepping down from Congress was the "hardest thing" she had ever had to do. “Having private photos of personal moments weaponized against me has been an appalling invasion of my privacy. It's also illegal, and we are currently pursuing all of our available legal options," she wrote. "However, I know that as long as I am in Congress, we'll live fearful of what might come next and how much it will hurt." Ms Hill has accused her husband, whom she is in the process of divorcing, of trying to humiliate her. She says the campaign relationship began in the final "tumultuous" years of her marriage. "I know that even a consensual relationship with a subordinate is inappropriate, but I still allowed it to happen despite my better judgment," she said in the letter to supporters. "For that I apologise." Two years ago during her congressional campaign, she described Kenny Heslep, whom she wed in 2010, in a social media post as "my best friend and the love of my life". In the statement on Sunday, she defined herself as a "fighter". "Now, my fight is going to be to defeat this type of exploitation that so many women are victims to and which will keep countless women and girls from running for office or entering public light."

Who is Katie Hill? 
Ms Hill has represented the 25th district in southern California since 2018, when she was elected as part of a Democratic wave. She is also vice-chairwoman of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, which has been investigating President Donald Trump's financial dealings. She previously worked as executive director of non-profit organisation People Assisting the Homeless.

^ Another “up and coming” politican has fallen from grace. I just can’t hold back my tears. I do enjoy seeing someone who thinks of themselves in such a righteous way to lose their political life under allegations of improper sexual relations (not to mention the sex pictures.) It does show that there is something to the allegations – why else would she leave office rather than stay and clear her name?  ^

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50203735

Latvia Grants

 From the MT:
“Latvia Rules to Grant Citizenship to Immigrants’ Children”

Latvia’s parliament has ruled to grant citizenship to all children born in the country, regardless of their parents’ citizenship status, in new legislation that has been described as “historic.” An estimated 230,000 people in Latvia, or more than 10 percent of the population, hold “non-citizen passports” that bar them from voting or holding certain government positions and are passed down to children. A majority are ethnic Russians who remained in the country after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Latvian lawmakers passed legislation earlier this month granting automatic citizenship to children born to non-citizens, the Baltic News Network reported. The Latvian Public Broadcasting organization called the Latvian parliament’s vote “historic.” “I welcome the Latvian Parliament taking a decisive step toward eliminating child statelessness,” said Dunja Mijatović, the Council of Europe’s human rights commissioner. “I regret however that the parliament did not extend automatic citizenship to all stateless children in Latvia who are currently under 15,” Mijatović said. She estimates there are almost 4,900 non-citizen children under 15 in Latvia. Many Baltic Russians carry more than two decades of grievances over citizenship, language and cultural policies that have these communities feeling marginalized from mainstream political and economic life in the countries that they call home.

^ Latvia’s Non-Persons (former Soviet citizens living in Latvia that refuse to integrate into Latvian society by learning/using the Latvian language among other things) shouldn’t receive any special treatment. If they want to live in Latvia (and with that inside the European Union) then they should have to show they know the Latvian language, Latvian history and Latvian culture. I believe that every country has a right to make non-citizens in their country show that they can integrate into that country’s society by proving they know the national language (if there is one) and know the history and culture of that country – if those non-citizens want to become citizens of that country. Of course I don’t think tourists, businesspeople or anyone else that doesn’t want to become a citizen of that country should have to follow those rules. The Soviet Union collapsed 28 years ago and so there is no real excuse (except for a belief of superiority over the Latvians) for non-citizens not to be able to speak Latvian and pass any test on Latvian history and culture. I have met many ethnic Russians around the world (in Russia itself, but also in: Germany, Israel, Cyprus, the US and other countries) where no matter how long they live in those places they still do not speak the national language of where they live and have citizenship in (ie. speaking Hebrew in Israel after becoming an Israeli citizen, etc.) I know that any group of people that goes to Russia and wants to become a Russian citizen has to prove they can speak Russian and know Russian history and culture so why shouldn’t ethnic Russians wishing to become a citizen of another country expect the same? Many ethnic Russians continue to see themselves as part of a Super Power even though their country collapsed 28 years ago and the only Super Power left is the United States. Once ethnic Russians (inside Russia or around the world) start to realize that fact then they can move on. The British have had to do the same not too long ago so it can be done (although Brexit shows there is still a little of that World Superiority in the UK.) The days of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union dictating the use of the Russian language in Latvia are long gone and should not be returned. One way of making sure these former Soviet, mostly ethnic Russians living in an independent Latvia for the past 28 years integrate into modern Latvian society is to ensure they know the true history (not the fake history taught during Soviet times) and can speak the Latvian language. Latvians that were forced to live in an occupied and annexed Soviet Union and made to not only learn, but use the Russian language every day from 1940-1941, and again from 1944-1991 had no rights. They either submitted to the Russians in their country or they disappeared. The policy that Latvia has used since regaining its independence in 1991 is nothing compared to what the ethnic Russians and Soviets used. Non-Person nationals inside Latvia live and work in freedom and can travel anywhere in Latvia and the EU. They don’t have to worry about being arrested in the middle of the night and deported thousands of miles away from their homes or even killed. Considering what Russia has done and is still doing to the non-ethnic Russians left in Russian-annexed Crimea (Ukraine) since 2014 - forcing them to use the Russian language and either accept Russian citizenship or made to disappear – what Latvia is doing is only encouraging Non-Persons to accept the lifestyle of the country they choose to live in. ^

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/10/28/latvia-rules-grant-citizenship-immigrants-children-a67928

Blue Bucket

From Yahoo/People:
“Mom Encourages Use of Blue Halloween Buckets for Autism Awareness This Halloween”



For children with autism, holidays like Halloween can sometimes be more stressful than they are fun. However, one Hawaii-based mom is determined to make sure her 3-year-old son — who is autistic and nonverbal — doesn’t have to worry about having a fun time while trick-or-treating this year. “My son is 3 years old and has autism. He is nonverbal. Last year houses will wait for him to say TRICK OR TREAT in order for him to get a piece of candy and there I go explaining the situation for the next 5 blocks,” Omairis Taylor wrote on Facebook last week. “This year we will be trying the BLUE BUCKET to signify he has autism.” Taylor is spreading awareness for the blue Halloween bucket initiative, where children on the spectrum carry a blue version of the traditional candy-collecting pail in order to signal that they may have autism and have a hard time asking for candy.  “Please allow him (or anyone with a BLUE BUCKET) to enjoy this day and don’t worry I’ll still say TRICK OR TREAT for him, ill get my mom candy tax later,” she added. “This holiday is hard enough without any added stress. Thank you in advance. P.s. I have made this post public in hopes you will share and get the BLUE BUCKET message out there for Autism Awareness and acceptance this Halloween.” The initiative went viral last year as well when Louisiana-based mom Alicia Plumer announced her then 21-year-old son would be using the blue bucket during his trick or treat excursion — so that people wouldn’t judge the older boy for enjoying the holiday.

 “Trick or Treat….the BLUE BUCKET…if you see someone who appears to be an adult dressed up to trick or treat this year carrying this blue bucket, he’s our son! His name is BJ & he is autistic,” she wrote last October. “While he has the body of a 21 year old, he loves Halloween. Please help us keep his spirit alive & happy. So when you see the blue bucket share a piece of candy. Spread awareness! These precious people are not ‘too big’ to trick or treat.” Plumer’s post was later shared by Autism Speaks, which also gave additional advice on how to help make Halloween a fun experience for everyone. The organization encourages parents to talk to their children ahead of trick-or-treating about what they may experience, and staying close to home in case a break is needed. It also offers that in place of a blue bucket, children can also wear a badge over their costume that communicates their autism to others. The blue bucket movement has also inspired other initiatives, including the Teal Pumpkin Project, which encourages people to offer non-food treats at their home so that children with food allergies can still enjoy the holiday, CBS reports.

^ I haven’t heard of the Blue Bucket until now (which isn’t very surprising since I haven’t had a trick-or-treater since I moved to my mountain – there are no kids here – in over 10 years. After doing some more reading about it I think it is a good idea. It will help the non-verbal (with or without Autism) to still be able to experience Halloween just like every other child. ^

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/mom-encourages-blue-halloween-buckets-185134324.html

Leader Dead

From the BBC:
“Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi: IS leader 'dead after US raid' in Syria”

The fugitive leader of the Islamic State (IS) group killed himself during a US military operation in north-west Syria, President Donald Trump has said. Speaking from the White House, Mr Trump said Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi detonated his suicide vest after fleeing into a tunnel, chased by US military dogs. Baghdadi came to prominence in 2014, when he announced the creation of a "caliphate" in areas of Iraq and Syria. IS carried out multiple atrocities that resulted in thousands of deaths. The jihadist group imposed a brutal rule in the areas under its control and was behind many attacks around the world. Although the US declared the "caliphate" defeated earlier this year, IS militants remain active in the region and elsewhere. Baghdadi's death is a major victory for Mr Trump as he faces heavy criticism for his decision to pull US troops out of northern Syria and fights an impeachment inquiry launched by Democrats. In an unusual Sunday morning statement, Mr Trump described the night-time operation in extraordinary detail, saying Baghdadi ran into a dead-end tunnel, "whimpering and crying and screaming", while being chased by military dogs. Baghdadi killed himself and three of his children by igniting his suicide vest, Mr Trump said, causing the tunnel to collapse. No US personnel were killed but one of the dogs was seriously injured in the explosion. 

Mr Trump called Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi a 'brutal killer' 
The blast mutilated Baghdadi's body but, according to the president, an on-site DNA test confirmed his identity. The special forces spent two hours in the area and gathered "highly sensitive material". "The thug who tried so hard to intimidate others spent his last moments in utter fear, in total panic and dread, terrified of the American forces bearing down on him," Mr Trump said. Also on Sunday, the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) said IS spokesman Abu al-Hassan al-Muhajir, described as Baghdadi's right-hand man, had been killed in a separate joint operation with the US military near the northern Syrian town of Jarablus.

What is known about the Baghdadi operation?
The location - the village of Barisha in Idlib province near the Turkish border - was far from where Baghdadi had been thought to be hiding along the Syria-Iraq border. Many parts of Idlib are under the control of jihadists opposed to IS but rival groups are suspected of sheltering IS members. Baghdadi had been under surveillance for "a couple of weeks" and "two or three" raids had been cancelled because of his movements, Mr Trump said, describing the IS leader's move to Idlib as part of a plan to rebuild the group. Security correspondent Frank Gardner: "He has symbolised the leadership of so-called Islamic State" An undisclosed number of forces targeted the compound using eight helicopters, which were met with gunfire, Mr Trump said. The commandos managed to land safely and entered the building by blowing holes in the wall, avoiding the main door which was believed to be booby-trapped. "He was a sick and depraved man," Mr Trump said. "He died like a dog, he died like a coward." US National Security Adviser Robert O'Brien said Baghdadi's remains should be given the same treatment applied to those of former al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, whose body was buried at sea after he was killed in a raid in 2011.

'Caliphate' defeated but IS remains a threat
A "large number" of Baghdadi's followers also died while others were captured, the president said. The dead included two of Baghdadi's wives who were both found wearing explosive vests that were not detonated. Eleven children were removed, uninjured, from the compound. The SDF - one of the main US allies in northern Syria until Mr Trump withdrew US troops from the area this month - said they had shared details about the location of high-level IS members, including Baghdadi. Iraqi officials also said they had provided "accurate information". Mr Trump praised them all, as well as Russia - which opened up the airspace it controls for the operation - Turkey and Syria for giving "certain support" to the operation. He said Russia had not been told about the nature of the US mission. After the president's address, the White House released pictures said to be of Mr Trump watching the operation from the Situation Room surrounded by Vice-President Mike Pence and top security officials. While IS lost its territory in Syria and Iraq after a years-long deadly campaign, experts say the group remains a threat, with affiliates active in various countries.

A foreign policy success for Donald Trump
The strategic significance of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi's death is clear. Removing a skilled and brutal leader from the battlefield will undoubtedly make allied efforts to eradicate IS forces easier. The lasting political benefits for Donald Trump remain to be seen. Baghdadi was far from a household name in the US, although IS has been a well-known adversary ever since its brutal executions and advance grabbed headlines in 2014. His death will give Mr Trump a signature moment to cite when making the case that his leadership has led to the methodical defeat of IS forces. It also will help deflect from weeks of sharp bipartisan criticism following the president's decision to remove US forces from northern Syria and tacitly permit a Turkish invasion to drive out US-allied Kurds. While it is true most Americans only pay attention to foreign policy during times of war, most of Mr Trump's current political headaches have come from actions directed abroad - whether it's the Syrian move or the rapidly unfolding impeachment inquiry into his Ukraine conduct. Now the president has a clear foreign policy success to tout. It will not solve all his political problems, but it is a start.

How has the world reacted? 
Leaders around the world reacted to the news of Baghdadi's death, with many stressing that the fight against the group continues.  UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson said Baghdadi's death was "an important moment in our fight against terror but the battle against the evil of [IS] is not over yet". French President Emmanuel Macron described the development as a "hard blow" against IS, but said "the fight continues to finally defeat this terrorist organisation".  In a statement, the Iraqi government highlighted its role in finding Baghdadi's hideout, and said it would continue to "relentlessly pursue" the militant group.

Who was Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi?
Baghdadi, whose real name was Ibrahim Awwad Ibrahim al-Badri, had a reputation as a highly organised and ruthless battlefield tactician. He was described as the world's most wanted man. He was born near Samarra, north of Baghdad, in 1971, and reports suggest he was a cleric in a mosque in the city around the time of the US-led invasion in 2003. Some believe he was already a jihadist during the rule of former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. Others suggest he was radicalised during the time he was held at Camp Bucca, a US facility in southern Iraq where many al-Qaeda commanders were detained. Baghdadi emerged in 2010 as the leader of an umbrella group that included al-Qaeda in Iraq, and rose to prominence when IS militants captured the Iraqi city of Mosul in 2014, when he declared the creation of a "caliphate". That was the only time Baghdadi was seen in public. At its peak, IS had eight million people in territories under its control. Baghdadi only reappeared in a video released by IS earlier this year. In October 2011, the US officially designated him a "terrorist" and offered a reward of $10m (£5.8m at the time) for information leading to his capture or death. This was increased to $25m in 2017. 

^ While it is a great thing that Baghdadi is dead there are several things to remember. He died by suicide (although he was being chased by American Special Forces.) An American Military Dog was wounded during the operation (so Trump shouldn’t have said Baghdadi “died like a dog” since dogs are much better than Baghdadi ever was.) Trump praised Russia and Turkey (when both of those countries are making Syria even less safer than it was before the Turkish invasion which is supported by Russia.) The US received intelligence from the Kurds (yet Trump continues to abandon them to their deaths by the Turks.) So while the head of ISIS is dead there were many mistakes made by Trump (before and after – I don’t know for sure about during – the operation.) A group like ISIS are crazy extremists and while losing their leader will stop them for a short time they will regroup – especially now that so many are allowed to flee the prisons in Syria because the Turks are more interested in killing the Kurds rather than stopping ISIS. ^

Hallowen-Christmas

Some channels have 31 Days of Halloween and other channels have Countdown to Christmas right now. Why can't they split the difference and have a channel that plays Christmas Horror movies?

Sunday, October 27, 2019

Many At Fault

 From the BBC:
“Islamic State group: Europe has ticking time bomb in prison camps”

Like a bad movie where you've already seen the ending, history now risks repeating itself in a dangerous corner of the Middle East.  Kurdish-run camps and detention centres confining tens of thousands of Islamic State (IS) fighters and their dependants are boiling over with frustrated rage.  This month, spurred on by Turkey's incursion into Syria and encouraged by their fugitive leadership, they have vowed to break out and wreak revenge on both their captors and the West, reconstituting themselves as they did in 2013.  While Turkey's actions have undoubtedly propelled this problem into a crisis - in excess of 100 IS prisoners (some reports put the figure as high as 800) have reportedly escaped already and are now at large - the problem goes much deeper. The fault lies primarily with Europe's governments. Since the military defeat  of IS by the US-led coalition at Baghuz in Syria in March, the world has had seven months in which to resolve the issue of all these beaten jihadists and their often-fanatical dependants.  Most are from Syria and Iraq but both those countries are in varying states of upheaval and the recent sentencing to death by an Iraqi court of French jihadists has discouraged further transfers there.  The hard core of die-hard IS fighters and their dependants are nearly all from outside the region - Europe, North Africa, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the Caucasus and Central Asia.  Recent reports from the largest camp, al-Hawl in north-east Syria, depict an ever-increasing takeover inside its walls by IS, including deadly punishments meted out by jihadist women. Children are growing up without any proper education and in some cases are being brainwashed with extreme and violent ideology. "The people there (in these camps) are very extreme," said Michael Stephens from the London think tank Royal United Services Institute (RUSI).  "If they escape or are allowed to keep raising children in these camps the problem in 10 years will be severe." Washington and its Kurdish allies have been pressing Europe to take back the estimated 4,000 plus nationals who slipped unnoticed across its borders and into Syria when IS was at its height.  But Europe doesn't want them back. Its intelligence agencies warn that many of those who survived the final days of IS's last stand will remain highly dangerous radicals, brutalised by the atrocities they have witnessed, and in some cases, committed. According to the German magazine Der Spiegel, German officials believe that a third of its nationals currently in the camps - a total of 27 men and women - are "capable of carrying out violent acts including terrorist attacks". This, it says, explains the German government's reluctance to bring them home. The problem is two-fold. Firstly, there is a fear that if and when these jihadists were eventually brought to trial in their home countries there could well be insufficient evidence - given the fluid circumstances in which they were captured - to convict them.  Governments would then be accused of allowing back in dangerous men and women who would go free and then pose a potential risk to national security.  Secondly, even if they were convicted they would only add to the growing problem of violent radicalisation taking place in European jails, where a disproportionate percentage of the prison population - notably in France - are from Muslim communities.  So the net result is that Europe has failed to act and the problem has been left to fester. As well as dangerous jihadists, thousands of innocent women and children have been left in limbo in these camps where in some cases those who do not follow IS's draconian rules are getting either indoctrinated or punished. The IS group has fallen a long way from its self-proclaimed caliphate of 2014  It is impossible to under-estimate the importance of "unjust imprisonment" in jihadist psychology. It goes right back to the 1960s when the radical Egyptian Islamist Sayyid Qutb was imprisoned and executed and his writings later became a blueprint for jihadist thought.  The assassination of Egypt's President Anwar Sadat in 1981 was followed by the mass imprisonment of Islamists in that country, something which became a rallying cry for their followers and which fed into Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaeda organisation.  After the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 the genesis of today's IS started out in the confines of the US-run Abu Ghraib and Camp Bucca prison camps that were set up.  Men like Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the group's current leader, exchanged ideas, swapped phone numbers with other prisoners and laid plans for an insurgency for when they got out. After eight years of misrule by an Iraqi government that discriminated against the country's Sunni minority, the jihadists chose their moment and swept into Mosul and northern Iraq in 2014. The rest is history: it took another five years to dismantle their self-proclaimed caliphate. So could the same thing happen again now? Probably not, say experts like Michael Stephens.  "The truth is that IS will struggle to reconstitute much past a low-level insurgency, but they'll be an irritant for years to come," he said. "A jail break would be highly worrying but the conditions on the ground are not really conducive to them simply rushing back in and filling vacuums in the way they did in 2013." Certainly it is hard to see IS being able to rebuild anything like the physical, geographic space it occupied and controlled for five years across a great swathe of Syria and Iraq. But Dr Emman El-Badawy, who has spent years researching Islamist extremism and who now works for the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, warns that IS is unlikely to pass up the opportunities now presented to it. "The recalibration of IS is likely to be just as deadly and destructive as what we saw in 2014-17," she said. "The group will be planting itself deeper into weakly governed areas and establishing safe havens for recruitment and training, fuelling instability and no doubt continuing to plot attacks abroad including in Europe and the US." Ultimately, the problem comes down to this. Unless there is a secure and humane resolution to the issue of those thousands displaced by the collapse of the IS caliphate then this will be a ticking time bomb that Europe and other parts of the world will live to regret.

^ So when (not if) ISIS regains its former strength and takes over land and carries out more terrorist attacks in the Middle East, in Europe and around the rest of the world it will be the fault of: Trump, the Turks, the Russians, the Germans, the British, the French and all the other European Governments that did not do a thing to secure the ISIS terrorists and their families when they had the chance. The blood of the innocent men, women and children that will be wounded or die in any future terrorist attacks will be on them as much as it will be on ISIS. ^