From the DW:
“Money for nothing: Germany
starts basic income experiment”
It sounds like an intriguing
offer. For a period of three years some people get €1,200 a month for free.
They only have to answer researchers' questions about how they're faring with
this unconditional income. Interest in taking part in the experiment has been
overwhelming. Within a week, more than 1.5 million volunteers have signaled
their willingness to participate in a big study on unconditional basic income. The
organizers are looking for a total of 1,500 participants, 120 of which will
receive €1,200 ($1,420) per month for a period of three years. "They don't
have to do anything for it except fill in seven online questionnaires during
those three years," says a description of the experiment on the project's
website. The money comes from around 150,000 donors right now and is tax-free
for all recipients. In the end, every participant will get €43,200, adding up
to a total of €5.2 million for the project. All of this has been initiated by a
Berlin-based public charity.
Basic income just a pipe
dream? Officials from the Mein
Grundeinkommen (My Basic Income) charity are convinced that an unconditional
income for all citizens would solve many current problems. The assumption is
that people get more creative and become freer and happier if they don't
constantly face the pressure to earn enough money to get by. Whether
this lives up to reality will be explored scientifically during the project.
"We'll analyze what people are doing during a period of guaranteed
material security," project chief Jürgen Schupp from the German Institute
for Economic Research (DIW) told DW. Among the questions he'll look into
are: Will the test persons spend all the money or will they save a certain
amount? Will they stop working altogether or work less? Also, will they donate
money to others? The experiment will give his team all the answers it
needs, says Schupp. Even changes in people's stress levels can be identified
with the help of hair samples, he argues.
Ideological barriers The
debate about an unconditional basic income has been going on for years, and
it's often been marked by people's ideological bias. The core question is what
people do when they don't have to do anything. Opponents think it's the idea of
left-leaning daydreamers who want to laze about at the expense of the whole
community. By contrast, supporters view such an income as a tool to
solve current and future problems. Education, nursing and helping neighbors
would gain a higher social status they argue. On top of that, models could be
developed for a time when more and more jobs would be slashed because of
ongoing digitalization and automation.
Does money make you more
courageous? DIW's Jürgen Schupp also
hopes to gain insights into aspects that opponents of a basic income emphasize
a lot: innovation and entrepreneurship. "Maybe the recipients of such an
income are willing to take more courageous decisions to become self-employed or
try another career." "We want to know," reads a slogan of
the German pilot project. The charity's Michael Bohmeyer concedes he's a bit
nervous about the findings. "It may well be that the pilot project will
not confirm the impact that we expect it to have," he says in a video on
the project's website. What
remains to be seen, though, is whether the public debate about unconditional
basic income will continue with fewer ideological blinkers in three years' time
when the results of the study will be published. There are already critics who
claim that the very idea of such an experiment lacks any sound footing. They
argue that three years aren't enough to come to any reliable conclusions as to
how people would behave if they had the security of a basic income for the rest
of their lives.
Political parties keep a low
profile Add to this the many
questions that the project cannot answer anyway: How will consumer prices
develop? Would ill or needy people have less money at their disposal than now?
And to what extent would taxes have to go up to finance such an income? "Our
study will certainly not be able to answer all the questions surrounding basic
income," Schupp concedes. But he's looking forward to getting an answer to
what he believes is the core issue: How does money influence people's behavior?
"That's a gripping scientific question, and there are no serious studies
to date looking into this," he says.
There have already been attempts to find out more about the impact of
unconditional basic income. The results of a labor-market-focused experiment in
Finland turned out to be ambiguous. A similar and even bigger, publicly
financed trial in Canada was halted after a short period because of exploding
costs. So far, there's been a lack of political support for basic income
schemes in Germany. None of the big parties has come out in favor of them. Only
recently, German Labor Minister Hubertus Heil and Finance Minister Olaf Scholz
indicated they were against it.
^ I am against a universal basic
income for everyone. I believe there should be Minimum Wages (that are equal
and not one amount for the disabled and one amount for the non-disabled or one amount
for those who get tips and those who don’t.) I also believe there should be
extra Local, State and Federal help for those who are disabled, Veterans, the elderly,
the sick, those who need help after a Natural Disaster, or those simply struggling. If you are unemployed you should be given
temporary help while you look for a new job. I also believe there should be
limits and drug tests for the unemployed and those struggling that receive Government
Assistance. ^
https://www.dw.com/en/basic-income-germany-tax-free/a-54700872
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.