From Insider:
“The Queen was head of the
Commonwealth for 70 years. Big changes could be in store after her death.”
For 70 years, Queen Elizabeth II
played a key role in keeping the Commonwealth alive. Her death marks the
beginning of a new chapter for the 54 countries once under her leadership. With
Charles taking over as King, the future of the Commonwealth is left in an
uncertain state. Commonwealth countries are mourning the death of Queen
Elizabeth II, which was announced by Buckingham Palace on Thursday. She was 96
years old. Her death raises questions as to what the future holds for the
Commonwealth, a remnant of the former British Empire and home to 2.4 billion
people living in the "world's largest, smallest, richest and poorest
countries, spanning five regions," according to the official website.
Here's what may be in store for
the Commonwealth following the Queen's death. Under Operation Unicorn, the
reported codename for events following the Queen's death in Scotland, leaders
of Commonwealth countries were some of the first to hear of the news. Plans
that have been long prepared in each country are now in motion to honor her
legacy. In Canada, plans for her death have been ready since 2002, according to
the National Post. They include immediately issuing all staff of Canada's
Governor General, Lieutenant Governors, and Territorial Commissioners black
ties and armbands. Elsewhere in Commonwealth countries in the Pacific, such as
Australia, New Zealand, and the Solomon Islands, flags are being flown at
half-mast to pay tribute to the monarch, The Guardian reported.
As King, Charles has become
head of the Commonwealth Royal historian and author Hugo Vickers told
Insider the respect for the Queen among Commonwealth countries has made her a
"hard act to follow." Prior to 2018, questions circulated
about who would become Head of the Commonwealth upon her death as unlike the
transfer of power between monarchs, installing a new Head of the Commonwealth
isn't automatic, Metro reported. The Independent reported in 2018 that
British politician Jeremy Corbyn suggested presidents should be elected on a
"rotational basis." But speculation ended after a 2018 summit of
Commonwealth leaders at Windsor Castle, when it was announced Charles would
assume the role, a decision made after the Queen had said it was her "sincere
wish," the BBC reported. Bob Morris, Honorary Senior Research
Associate at the Constitution Unit at UCL, told Insider that Charles has
"always taken the Commonwealth very seriously." In March 2021, the
former Prince of Wales delivered a speech on Commonwealth Day calling the
organization a "cornerstone" of his life, The Express reported.
Under King Charles,
Commonwealth countries should expect to see their leader more often It's
been seven years since a reigning British monarch and Head of the Commonwealth
visited one of the member states abroad, Tatler reported. But that will likely
change with Charles as the head. At 73, he's in a much better position
to undertake international official visits that Queen Elizabeth II stopped
doing in 2015. That said, he will not be embarking on any trips without an
invitation from Commonwealth countries, Morris said. "He will only
do so by invitation, he's the head of state, but he's not going to go barge
in," Morris added.
Some states may now break away
Only 14 Commonwealth countries have the British monarch as their head of
state. These are known as "realms" and include Canada, Australia, and
Jamaica. But even before her death, there have been signs that some
countries have grappled with a complicated historical relationship with the
former British empire and are preparing for change. In November 2021,
Barbados – one of the world's oldest colonies – became the first country in
nearly three decades to remove the monarch as its head of state. Previously, the
last country to have done so was Mauritius in 1992. With the Queen's
death, it could be that other realms who have been holding back out of respect
for the Queen will soon be revisiting the idea of independence. "There's
been talk in a number of the Commonwealth monarchies like Jamaica," Morris
said. "Others may return to that point because they partly they didn't to
show any disrespect for the Queen." Australia already considered
the idea of becoming a republic, holding a referendum in 1999. The results of
the referendum were relatively close, with the republicans in favor of ditching
the monarch as head of state ultimately losing with an outcome of 45% to 55%.
However, the reality of becoming a republic is easier said than done,
Morris said, as it involves changing a country's constitution. "In
Canada, it's impossible to change the constitution unless you get the agreement
of all the provinces," Morris added.
At least 6 countries have
recently signaled intentions to change their head of state More recent
speculation regarding whether countries toying with the idea of becoming
republics will make the leap and do so happened during Prince William and Kate
Middleton's eight-day tour of Belize, Jamaica, and the Bahamas in March – a
visit that was later labeled "tone deaf" by royal commentators. William,
who is now first in line to inherit the throne after Charles, and Middleton
were forced to cancel the first leg of the tour in Belize after locals carrying
signs referencing colonialism and land disputes organized protests on their
arrival. Later, the duke and duchess were criticized after photos of them
greeting children through holes in a wire fence on a football field in
Kingston, Jamaica, were released, Newsweek reported. The prince
expressed his "profound sorrow" over the history of slavery while
making a speech at a dinner held by Jamaica's Governor General. But his
comments were later criticized by protestors, who said he did not take
"responsibility" for the monarchy's role in slavery, The Independent
reported. Following the tour, at least six Caribbean countries –
including Jamaica, Belize, and Grenada – also signaled they intended to remove
the British ruler as their sovereign. "The move towards
republicanism is grounded in the belief that it's time for former colonized
nations to really live their independence and claim self-determination and not
be under a monarchical system," Verene Shepherd, the chair of Jamaica's
National Commission on Reparations and chair of the U.N. Committee on the
Elimination of Racial Discrimination, told Foreign Policy Magazine.
Countries may leave or join
the Commonwealth, and Charles won't have a say According to Vickers, the
King's father, Prince Philip, once said: "We'll go quietly if you don't
want us," regarding the decision of the Commonwealth realms to break away
from the monarchy. It's likely Charles will adopt the same mentality,
especially since neither the UK government nor the monarch has the power to
stop them, Morris said. "They're independent countries and they
must order their affairs as they see fit," Morris added. Even if
realms choose to break away, there's no saying they would cut ties with the
Commonwealth completely. Despite no longer having the monarch as its head of
state, Barbados chose to remain a member of the Commonwealth, The Independent
reported. It's also worth noting that two countries without historic
ties to the British Empire have previously joined the association voluntarily,
the last being Rwanda in 2009.
^ As a Canadian Citizen and
Commonwealth Realm Citizen I liked having Queen Elizabeth as the First Canadian
Monarch and the First Canadian Queen. I do not have the same feelings towards
King Charles as Canadian King. If he doesn’t Abdicate the Canadian Throne so
his Son, Prince William, will became King of Canada then I would like Canada to
move away from being a Monarchy to a Republic. As it is I don’t approve that
the Monarch of Canada (and the UK and Australia and New Zealand, etc.) has to
be a Protestant - showing favoritism
over all other Religions. There is no Separation of Church and State. King
Charles has shown (in his 50+ years of public service) that he can not and will
not abide by the Constitutional Monarch’s Neutrality Stance as his Mother does
and so I don’t see him as being able to represent Canada around the world. I
also don’t approve of his other personal choices. ^
https://www.yahoo.com/news/queen-head-commonwealth-70-years-095219215.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.