From the BBC:
“Ukraine grain deal: Where are
the ships going?”
The UN secretary general called
it "an agreement for the world". Speaking in Istanbul on 22 July,
Antonio Guterres said the Black Sea Grain Initiative would bring relief for
"the most vulnerable people on the edge of famine". The deal - agreed
with Russia and Ukraine last month - allowed ships carrying much-needed
Ukrainian food products to leave the country's Black Sea ports for the first
time since the war began. A month later, more than 50 ships have so far braved
the risks and departed Ukraine - helping to export over 1.2 million tonnes of
grain and other foodstuffs. The war which rages close by has so far failed to
intrude and more and more ships are joining in.
But where is all the food
going?
A deal which the UN argued
forcefully was needed to prevent millions of people from going hungry has so
far seen only modest humanitarian benefits. The first ship carrying food aid on
behalf of the World Food Programme (WFP) has only just arrived at its
destination. The bulk carrier Brave Commander is carrying 23,000 tonnes of
wheat intended for vulnerable communities in southern Ethiopia. It left the
Ukrainian port of Pivdennyi on 16 August and has just berthed in Djibouti. The
WFP has a second ship, the MV Karteria, loaded and ready to carry 37,500 tonnes
of wheat to Yemen, where it is badly needed. Officials at the agency say they
hope other shipments will follow. But these are tiny quantities. In 2021, WFP
distributed 4.4 million tonnes of food aid around the world. Two thirds of it
came from Ukraine. UN officials recognise that these are modest beginnings, but
insist that the wider picture is important. "You've got to separate what
we're doing from the overall opening up of the ports and the flooding of the
market with this extraordinary amount of grain," says Greg Barrow, senior
spokesman for the UN's World Food Programme.
The reappearance of Ukrainian
grain on the international market has certainly brought relief around the
world. "It's good news for Irish agriculture," says John Bergin,
Commercial Director of R&H Hall, Ireland's leading importer of grain for
animal feed. The Navi Star, which recently arrived at Foynes on the west coast
of Ireland laden with 33,000 tonnes of corn, was a welcome sight. The ship was
being loaded on 24 February, the day Russia's invasion began. "There was
28,000 tonnes on that ship the morning the war started," Mr Bergin
recalls. "Our supplier never got the ship out. Then the port became mined
and the whole thing got stuck." The war brought Ukraine's peak export
period, which runs from December to April, grinding to a halt. Grain prices,
already driven high by the coronavirus pandemic and droughts elsewhere, shot
up, but have recently come down again. "Average export prices were around
30-40% higher before the conflict began," says Alexander Karavaytsev,
senior economist at the International Grain Council. "Now they're 8%
higher, so prices have declined markedly." Some of the reduction in price
is due to seasonal impacts, as harvests progress elsewhere in the northern
hemisphere, but the psychological impact of unblocking one of the world's major
grain producers is important. "It brings some solidity back into the
market," Mr Bergin says. As grain silos are emptied and previously trapped
vessels are liberated, industry sources are daring to hope that better days are
ahead. "There is growing optimism that agriculture commodities will
continue to flow," says a spokesman for Viterra, a grain and oilseed
exporter with a significant presence in Ukraine. "We are seeing an
increased willingness from vessel owners to enter Ukrainian ports, which will
also grow if passage remains safe."
But how big an "if"
is that? Despite the deal struck in Istanbul in July, freight costs are
still almost double what they were before the war, reflecting a lingering
nervousness about the potential dangers associated with sending vessels into a
war zone. That nervousness is likely to prevent Ukraine from hitting the
targets it needs to generate badly-needed revenue for its battered economy. "They
want to hit 5 million tonnes a month," says Bridget Diakun, Lloyd's List
data reporter. "It sounds ambitious." For now, it's smaller shipping
companies, many of them Turkish, which seem willing to take the risk, with many
of the world's big players still holding back. "They just want to keep the
safety of the vessel and the safety of the crew as their top priority,"
says Nidaa Bakhsh, senior markets reporter at Lloyd's List. "And they
can't guarantee that they will be safe."The clock is ticking. The
agreement brokered by the UN and Turkey only runs for 120 days. It can be
extended in mid-November, but only if Russia and Ukraine agree. For the UN,
which has set so much store behind the success of the deal, to have it stop
after just four months would be disastrous. "The world is going to
struggle if that market is closed off again," says WFP's Greg Barrow. Grain
deals are normally struck 18 months to two years ahead. With no-one able to
predict the state of Ukraine's economy in 2023-24, it's going to take time
before that level of confidence returns. Finally, what ever happened to
the Razoni, the first vessel to leave Ukraine, amid great fanfare, at the
beginning of August? The UN's checklist still has TBD ("to be
determined") against the ship's destination, an awkward admission that the
26,000 tonnes of corn on board never reached its intended port, Tripoli in
Lebanon. When the original buyer rejected the shipment, apparently citing
quality concerns, the Razoni embarked on a circuitous voyage around the eastern
Mediterranean, much of it with its transponder switched off, indicating a
reluctance to be tracked. It finally unloaded most of its cargo at the Syrian
port of Tartus. There's nothing illegal about delivering food to Syria,
or unusual about ships changing direction. But the Razoni's secretive journey
shows that in the complex world of grain trading, you can't always be sure
where individual cargoes eventually end up.
^ Ukrainian Farmers risk their
lives (under constant Russian Bombs, Missiles and Bullets) to grow and harvest
their crops.
Ukrainian Truck Drivers risk their
lives (under constant Russian Bombs, Missiles and Bullets) to transport the
crops to the Ports.
Ukrainian Dock Workers risk their
lives (under constant Russian Bombs, Missiles and Bullets) to load the ships
with the crops.
Ukrainian Sailors risk their
lives (under Constant Russian Bombs, Missiles Bullets and Mines) to ship the
crops out of Ukraine
Despite all the Ukrainian
sacrifice these ships are now feeding people who support Russia's War in
Ukraine. ^
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.