From Reuters:
“Brexit in crisis: EU 'very
concerned' by UK plan to break divorce treaty”
Britain plunged Brexit trade
talks into crisis on Wednesday by explicitly acknowledging it could break
international law by ignoring some parts of its European Union divorce treaty,
prompting a rapid rebuke from the EU’s chief executive. Brushing aside warnings
from Brussels that breaching the treaty would prevent any trade deal being
struck, London said in the proposed legislation that it would ignore parts of
the Withdrawal Agreement, which was only signed in January. The Internal Markets
Bill spells out that certain provisions are “to have effect notwithstanding
inconsistency or incompatibility with international or other domestic law”. The
government has said international law would be broken “in a very specific and
limited way”. Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission,
promptly tweeted that she was “very concerned about announcements from the
British government on its intentions to breach the Withdrawal Agreement”. “This
would break international law and undermines trust. Pacta sunt servanda = the
foundation of prosperous future relations,” she said. The Latin phrase, meaning
“agreements must be kept”, is a basic principle of international law. The
publication of the bill, on the day the EU’s chief negotiator arrived in London
for a fresh round of trade talks, suggested to some that Prime Minister Boris
Johnson might be trying to goad the bloc into storming out of those
negotiations. But EU sources told Reuters they would not seek a suspension. Johnson
told parliament the bill was “a legal safety net to protect our country against
extreme or irrational interpretations” of the Withdrawal Agreement’s Northern
Ireland protocol that could threaten peace in the British province.
“KAMIKAZE THREAT” The bill, if approved, would give ministers
the power to ignore parts of that protocol by modifying the form of export
declarations and other exit procedures. But the list of specific agreements
that might be ignored includes not only provisions of the Northern Ireland
Protocol but also “any other provision of the EU Withdrawal Agreement” and “any
other EU law or international law”. The bill says Britain may ‘disapply’
provisions including one that relates to Northern Ireland and state aid.
Johnson’s team see state aid as crucial for ensuring they can incubate new
global technology firms without hindrance from Brussels. Johnson’s spokesman
said the EU divorce deal was like no other treaty and had been “agreed at pace
in the most challenging possible political circumstances”. Opponents accused
him of blatant hypocrisy after promising before December’s election that he had
an “oven-ready deal”. The bill will be debated in both chambers of parliament
and require their approval before becoming law. Britain quit the EU in January
but has remained part of its single market, largely free of trade barriers,
under a status quo agreement that expires in December. It has been negotiating
a trade deal to take effect from Jan. 1, but says it is willing to walk away if
it cannot agree favourable terms. Irish Prime Minister Micheal Martin said he
would speak to Johnson to express “very strong concerns” about the plans while
his deputy Leo Varadkar called it a “kamikaze” threat that had backfired. Asked how he could expect Britons to obey the
law if his government was willing to undermine it, Johnson said: “We expect
everybody in this country to obey the law.” Senior members of Johnson’s
Conservative Party have already voiced anger that Britain might consider
breaking international law after decades of urging others to uphold it. Scotland
and Wales said the bill would weaken the fabric of the United Kingdom itself by
stealing powers from them and Northern Ireland.
ˆI honestly hope that the UK does
not pass this new law. You can not be considered a respectable country if you
make International Agreements and then willingly break those International
Agreements. Russia did that with its International Agreements regarding Ukraine
and now no one sees Russia as a respectable country. ^
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.