From Time:
“9/11 Is History Now. Here's How
American Kids Are Learning About It in Class”
On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001,
Lauren Hetrick was a 16-year-old sophomore at Hershey High School in Hershey,
Pa. Her French class was just about to start when a strange announcement came
over the P.A. system: “Attention, teachers: The computer tech is in the
building.” The teacher, hearing those words, logged onto her computer. Then she
started to cry. She turned on the TV, and there was the North Tower at the
World Trade Center, in flames. The class watched as a second plane hit the
South Tower. Then the students watched the collapse of the tallest buildings in
New York City. Nearly two decades later, Hetrick has cause to see her teacher’s
behavior that morning through a slightly different lens: She became a high
school teacher herself, so helping students understand the events of 9/11 is
part of her job too. This generation of students were almost all born after
that defining 21st century moment, so while the attack may seem like yesterday
to those old enough to remember it, to Hetrick’s students, it’s history. Many teachers who remember what it was like to
have been in school at that time use the memory to help their students connect
to the topic. Hetrick, who chairs her school’s Social Studies department in
Newville, Pa., shows her students the same Today show episode she watched that
day. She also encourages them to listen to the stories of victims’ families and
first responders recorded by StoryCorps, in hopes the personal recollections
will make students more engaged “by seeing I’m truly invested in what we’re
doing, seeing how much I’m caring about this, how emotional I get.” When she
first started teaching U.S. History in 2008, that lesson felt like déjà vu.“I
was teaching sophomores about my experience as a sophomore, and I would go home
after that lesson and just break down,” she recalls. “I was having a hard time
detaching. [Teachers] want to form a connection, but we also need to stay
professional as historians and have that little bit of detachment. It’s
definitely not easy to do.”
What Must Be Learned
It’s not surprising that teaching
9/11 as history is a delicate task. In addition to the emotional burden that
falls on teachers who remember that day, the subject matter is sensitive and
the images and documents that might be used as primary sources are disturbing.
The story is also very much still being written, as the effects of 9/11 on
American society continue to evolve. There is also no national guideline that
states are required to follow in terms of teaching the topic, so lessons will
vary depending on the teacher or school district. In New York, for example,
schools will observe a moment of silence on Wednesday, after Gov. Andrew Cuomo
signed a law on Monday requiring observation of the anniversary. A 2017
analysis of state high-school social-studies academic standards in the 50
states and the District of Columbia noted that 26 specifically mentioned the
9/11 attacks, nine mentioned terrorism or the war on terror, and 16 didn’t
mention 9/11 or terrorism-related examples at all. That variation is part of
the reason why Jeremy Stoddard, a professor at the University of
Wisconsin-Madison School of Education, set out to analyze how teachers are
talking about 9/11 in classrooms nationwide. A new study released this month,
on which Stoddard is the lead author, polled 1,047 U.S. middle- and high-school
teachers and revealed that the most popular method of teaching about 9/11 and
the War on Terror was showing a documentary or “similar video.” The next most
cited method was discussing related current events. The third most mentioned
approach was sharing personal stories, the way Hetrick does; Stoddard says
younger teachers in particular tend to aim to get kids “to feel like they felt
that day, to understand the shock and horror people felt that day.” The survey
built on his prior research looking at textbooks and classroom resources
developed to teach about the event in the first few years after 2001. He and
UW-Madison colleague Diana Hess studied nine of the bestselling high school U.S
History, World History, Government and Law textbooks published in 2004 and
2006, and then did side-by-side comparisons between three of them and editions
published in 2009 and 2010, noting how descriptions of the attacks evolved.
For example, four of the nine
earlier textbooks mentioned the war in Iraq as part of the aftermath of 9/11,
but when Stoddard and Hess were doing research in 2005, only one, McDougal
Littell’s The Americans (2005), got into how evidence for the weapons of mass
destruction claims had not yet been found. One 2005 textbook, Prentice Hall’s
Magruder’s American Government, said that when Congress authorized President
George W. Bush to take whatever measures were “necessary and appropriate” to
neutralize the threat of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein in the wake of 9/11, “it
was widely believed that the regime had amassed huge stores of chemical and
biological weapons”; the 2010 edition deleted the sentence about weapons of
mass destruction. In some textbooks, the descriptions of the attacks got
shorter as time went on. For example, that 2005 edition of The Americans said
about 3,000 people were killed in the attacks, and then specified how many were
passengers on the planes, people who worked at or were visiting the World Trade
Center, and how many were first responders. The 2010 version cut out the
breakdown of the casualties. “A lot of the main themes that we saw way back in
2003 — in terms of, it’s a day of remembrance, a focus on the first responders
and the heroes of the day and the actions they took, the world coming together
in response to this horrible terrorist attack — a lot of those themes are still
very much the way it’s being taught,” says Stoddard. “Middle schools are
focusing a little bit more on first responders and heroes of the day. High
school is where you would probably see more of an emphasis on the causes, the
events leading up to it and maybe more on the response. High–school teachers
did talk more about the Patriot Act and surveillance and some of those
national-security-versus-civil-liberties types of issues.”
Beyond the Textbooks
But, in keeping with some larger
pedagogical trends in recent years, textbooks are not the go-to resource for
learning about 9/11 in 2019. Part of the reason is that, even if publishers
update textbooks, schools may not have the budget to buy the latest edition; Kayla
Turner, a high school social studies teacher in Raleigh, N.C., says some of the
textbooks used in her classes haven’t been updated since 2001. Like Hetrick,
Turner relies on personal experience to connect her students to the material.
“I get teary-eyed with my students,” she says, especially when she explains
that her father was a corrections officer who got called in to do crowd control
at Ground Zero, and her cousin’s husband was a first responder. So, in
Stoddard’s new survey of secondary-school teachers, 71% said they use websites,
33% said they use specific curricula produced by non-profit and educational
organizations and 23% said they use textbooks to explain 9/11 — and about 20%
of participants said they didn’t have the curriculum or materials they needed
to discuss 9/11 and the War on Terror. Some non-profits and educational
organizations offer free online resources that help fill that void, especially
for the youngest students. Teachers to whom TIME spoke mentioned the 9/11
Memorial Museum’s interactive timeline; the museum also offers a range of
educational resources, all the way down to kindergarten-appropriate lesson
plans that talk about the search-and-rescue dogs and emergency preparedness.
Other resources include sites like Teaching Tolerance, which produces online
guidelines for educators on debunking negative stereotypes about Muslims. But
flexible curricula can also introduce a different kind of obstacle for
teachers. For example, Turner says she’s gotten pushback from parents for
making a point to tell her students that the Islamist extremists who hijacked
the planes on 9/11 don’t represent the views of all Muslims, and she’s had
students who have come to the subject believing conspiracy theories that 9/11
didn’t really happen or was orchestrated by the government. Stoddard says her
experience is not uncommon, as other teachers have told him they are
increasingly having to field questions from students about conspiracy theories.
One aspect of the curriculum that has drawn particular debate is the question
of whether pictures from 9/11 are too disturbing to use in classrooms. But,
while textbook publishers and writers consider the appropriateness of showing
them, teachers say photo and video are making 9/11 resonate with students —
particularly because, as difficult as it may be for older Americans to imagine,
students may not feel any particular sense of pathos or fascination about the
day. During a recent Twitter chat for social studies teachers on discussing
9/11, some teachers said they rely on more visceral images and records, but
that they also remind students that the current government agencies such as the
Department of Homeland Security and thorough airport security check-in
processes are products of 9/11. Others point out ways students can help in a
future crisis.
‘A Long Time Ago’
But what do kids themselves say
they’re learning about 9/11? At the 9/11 Memorial on the weekend before this
year’s anniversary, kids and parents alike told TIME that school wasn’t where
they had learned most of what they knew about the attacks. Liam Kerr Finger, a
10-year-old fifth grader visiting New York City with his family from
Burlington, N.C., said he’d seen the news footage from 9/11 last year, in a
documentary playing on TV at home. But his twin sister, Eleanor Ford Kerr
Finger, hadn’t seen footage of the attacks before going to the museum, and was
trying to get her head around the significance of the events. While she found
it easier to draw a line between the causes and effects of other historical
events she’d learned about — the Civil War and the end of slavery, the
Revolutionary War and American independence — it wasn’t immediately clear how
9/11 had changed the world. One of her parents, Shellie Kerr, said she had been
trying to explain to her kids that in fact they saw the effects of 9/11 in
their everyday lives all the time, right down to the security line they had to
wait on to enter the museum that day. Joshua Petit-Day, 10, from Linden, N.J.,
said he had been learning about the attacks since first grade. His parents took
him to the museum around the anniversary, and he said he learns more new
details about 9/11 every September. To him, the events of that day are a
reminder of how dangerous the world is. “Everyone should know what it means and
why it happened because you never know if something like that is going to
happen again,” he said. “It’s not really talked about a lot,” said Che Rose,
14, a 10th grader from Jersey City, N.J., who said he got the feeling that
teachers were reluctant to get into it. His sister, Jordana, 12, a seventh
grader, had recently read a novel based on the attacks, Towers Falling. “At
home we get more of the facts,” she said, pointing out that her father, who was
with them, worked in midtown on 9/11. And, thinking about this moment that
shaped the world into which she was born, she marveled at the fact that the
attacks weren’t actually such faraway history after all. “Feels like it was a
long time ago,” she said. “Only 18 years ago? Feels further than that.”
^ This is one of those subjects
that is very important to teach and also very sensitive. It has been 18 years
since 9-11 and that means the first people born after the attacks are now
legally adults so all those under 18 were born post-9-11 and yet they live in a
world that is directly affected by the attacks (ie. the Wars in Afghanistan and
Iraq, Islamic Terrorism around the world, right security in airports and public
buildings, etc.) ^
https://news.yahoo.com/9-11-history-now-heres-195214890.html;_ylt=AwrJ61yEF3hdopUAWZ1XNyoA;
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.