From CBC:
“She begged for help as
husband struggled: Why home care is failing thousands while companies profit”
(Willie Foreman says after her
husband, Robert Foreman, had a stroke, the home care giant Paramed provided
service that was ‘so sporadic and frustrating’ she was forced to put him in a
nursing home.)
Willie Foreman promised her
husband, Robert, that she would look after him at home after he suffered a
debilitating stroke and became paralyzed, leaving him unable to dress, toilet
or feed himself. But that became impossible, she said, after the publicly
funded home care company that was supposed to help her husband of 50 years —
Paramed, owned by long-term care conglomerate Extendicare — was so unreliable
she was forced to put him in hospital, where he waited months for a bed in a
nursing home. "I begged [Paramed] to send somebody," said Foreman, in
London, Ont. "It was terribly frustrating."
Nearly one million Canadians rely
on some sort of home care support, but a Marketplace investigation has found a
shroud of secrecy around companies' use of public funds. Interviews with
industry insiders and documents obtained by Marketplace reveal a system with so
few checks and balances that it's leading to missed home visits, downloading of
care and front-line workers so poorly paid they are leaving the sector in
droves. "We don't publicly report or collect home care data in the way we
do for long-term care," said Tamara Daly, a political economist and health
services researcher at the York University in Toronto.
"That is a massive
problem." Across the country,
home care is publicly funded, but how it's delivered varies widely. B.C.,
Saskatchewan and the territories deliver public home care themselves. All other
provinces also contract private companies. Ontario issues thousands of
contracts to home care providers to deliver services to about 700,000 people —
some companies are not-for-profit, but the majority and biggest players are
largely for-profit companies. Those contracts fall under a provision of
the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act that shields them from
public scrutiny. "These companies have no pressure to be
transparent, so we really can't say that the money is going for good
care," said Daly. "We publicly fund this. We're entitled to know this
information."
Missed visits After Robert
Foreman, 73, was sent home from hospital in 2015, Paramed was contracted to
send two personal support workers (PSWs) to provide care, twice a day for 45
minutes. But his wife said that
at least twice a week, that didn't happen — only one PSW showed up or no one
came at all. "I was beyond
being able to know what to do anymore," she said. So how often do
home care companies miss appointments the government pays them to deliver? A
privacy officer for Ontario's Home and Community Support Services said that
information wasn't easily available — 14 health regions would take months and
likely charge fees for collecting that data and even then, in order to release
the names of the private home care companies involved, she would have to get
permission from those companies. An auditor general's report released in
December 2021 also said the Ontario government had "little
information" on the frequency of missed home care visits, as private
companies aren't required to report how often that happens. "It's wrong," said Natalie
Mehra, executive director of the Ontario Health Coalition and a longtime
advocate for public health care. "There is no public interest
justification in keeping secret [what's in] commercial contracts with public money."
Personal support workers
double-booked
(A personal support worker makes
calls to clients before he starts his shift. He says his employer, Paramed,
sometimes schedules him to see two clients at the same time.)
Marketplace spoke to a number of
PSWs who said they know why some clients' visits are missed — the companies
they work for schedule appointments back-to-back with no travel time between
and sometimes double-book appointments with clients or schedule overlapping
appointments. "Probably once a week I'll look at my schedule and
it'll be overlapped or double-booked," said a PSW who has worked for
Paramed for more than five years. CBC is not revealing his name to protect his
employment. "They can make
double what they make in an hour sometimes … and they're shorting the
client."
'They still get their money' Allegations
of public dollars sometimes going to home care companies for services that
aren't delivered is a well-known secret, according to Mehra. "Home
care companies get contracts for … visits that they do not fulfil, yet they
still get their money," she said. "Nobody is held accountable for
that in any way." Marketplace put the allegations to Paramed and
requested an interview, but the company declined to comment, saying the
industry's association, Home Care Ontario, would address our findings. Home Care Ontario declined an interview
request and issued a statement from CEO Sue VanderBent that didn't address
concerns about billing for missed visits. VanderBent did say the
industry was "in crisis," pointing out that health-care professionals
are paid more to work in other parts of the system. "As a result,
staff have left home care by the thousands during the pandemic," she
wrote, and called on the provincial government for more funding to pay workers
better wages.
'I was in sheer and utter
shock'
(Home care giant Bayshore was
contracted to provide palliative care for Mike McLean, who was suffering from
blood cancer. No one from Bayshore paid a visit in the eight days leading up to
his death.)
Maxine McLean said she didn't get
anywhere near the home care promised for her ailing husband. Mike McLean, 76,
was losing a battle with blood cancer and was sent home from an Ottawa hospital
in February 2020 for palliative home care to be provided by Bayshore Home
Health — another giant home care provider. But McLean said in the six weeks leading up to
her husband's death, much of the care that Bayshore promised was downloaded
onto the family — and twice, nurses didn't come for more than a week, including
in the eight days prior to her husband's death. Perhaps most traumatizing, she
said, was Bayshore's expectation that her daughter — a nurse — would have to
personally administer medication to ease her father's transition to death. "She's
crying," said McLean. "She says, 'Mom, I just can't.' I was in sheer
and utter shock." Marketplace repeatedly requested an interview with Bayshore
but never heard back. Finally, the company's lawyer said Home Care Ontario
would speak for them, too. The statement from Home Care Ontario did not address
the McLeans' concerns. Mehra, the
health-care advocate, said she's not surprised by the McLeans' devastating
experience. "People [leaving hospital] are promised the sun and the
moon," she said. "And they get home and no home care materializes.
"
PSWs barely paid more than
minimum wage
(Natalie Mehra, executive
director of the Ontario Health Coalition and a longtime advocate for public
health care, says for-profit home care companies generally pay their employees
less than not-for-profit companies.)
Besides secret contracts between
government and home care providers, Mehra blames the profit element involved in
the industry. "The for-profits have to make room for profit," she
said, adding that they do that by generally paying their front-line workers
less money than not-for-profit counterparts. Ontario PSWs working in home care start at
$16.50 an hour. In Saskatchewan, where the government delivers home care, the
collective agreement with the union representing PSWs shows they make about $7
more an hour. On top of low wages, PSWs told Marketplace that companies only
pay them for the time spent with clients. There is no compensation for their
travel time or the time spent each day contacting clients to let them know
they're on their way — which can add several hours a day of unpaid work. "These
home care companies are claiming the problems are due to the pandemic — 'It's
not our fault, people didn't call into work,'" said health researcher
Daly. "What the corporations are
doing is placing the burden of care on these poorly paid workers." Ontario Premier Doug Ford declined an
interview request, as did Health Minister Christine Elliott. At an unrelated news conference two weeks ago,
Elliott told a Marketplace producer that all players — for-profit home care
companies and not-for-profit — are "important." A statement from the Ontario Ministry of
Health said it's investing more money in home care and is "committed to
ensuring that Ontarians have access to the home care services they need." Meantime, Foreman said not a day goes by that
she doesn't feel she failed her husband, for being unable to care for him at
home. "I feel pretty guilty," she said. "But I just can't do it
anymore."
^ Home Health Care is a huge
business in Canada (and the US.) Even before Covid there were shortages of
trained people working so it was always a “Employer/Employee Market” instead of
a “Client Market.” That means the Client
- the Patient needing the Home Health Care has limited options with
respect to Home Health Care Companies and Employees coming to help them. Covid
has only increased the problems of limited companies and staffing. There needs
to be more State/Provincial and Federal oversight on Home Health Care Providers.
While it is hard to find a good and reliable service once you do there needs to
be protocols in-place to make sure that there is a backup plan if something
happens- like a sick Staffer, etc. so every
Client is provided for. You shouldn’t be able to have more Clients then you can
care for. ^
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/home-care-support-private-companies-1.6387911
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.