From Reuters:
“U.S. judge rules against
Kentucky clerk who denied same-sex marriage licenses”
A U.S. judge ruled that a former
county clerk from Kentucky knowingly violated the rights of same-sex couples by
denying them marriage licenses in 2015, clearing the way for a jury trial
seeking damages against her. The ruling from U.S. District Judge David Bunning
on Friday also denied a request for immunity from former Rowan County Clerk Kim
Davis. Davis thrust herself into the center of the U.S. culture wars on the
issue of LGBTQ rights by denying the licenses in 2015, citing her religious
beliefs. She briefly went to jail for contempt of court over her refusal and a
deputy clerk in the eastern Kentucky county issued the licenses. The two
couples in the lawsuit had sought to marry in the immediate aftermath of the
landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision Obergefell v. Hodges. They sued Davis
in 2015, alleging she had violated their constitutional rights. In the
Obergefell case, the highest court in the United States found that, under the
due process and equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, states must grant same-sex marriages and recognize those of other
states.
But Davis repeatedly refused to
issue marriage licenses, despite a letter from the governor instructing all
county clerks to issue the licenses and a legal opinion from the Rowan County
attorney, which she had sought, advising that she had a legal requirement to do
so. "It is readily apparent that Obergefell recognizes Plaintiffs'
Fourteenth Amendment right to marry. It is also readily apparent that Davis
made a conscious decision to violate Plaintiffs' right," the judge ruled
in a summary judgment. With the essential facts in the case now settled, the
two couples, David Ermold and David Moore in one case and James Yates and Will
Smith in another, can proceed to jury trial to seek damages against Davis as an
individual. Davis had previously been granted sovereign immunity in her
official capacity. Liberty Counsel, a Christian organization representing
Davis, said it would continue to argue she is not liable for damages because
she is entitled to a religious accommodation granted by the state legislature
and former Governor Matt Bevin. The group's statement also noted that
conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court could seek to revisit and
overturn the Obergefell decision. "This case raises serious First
Amendment free exercise of religion claims and has a high potential of reaching
the Supreme Court," Liberty Counsel founder and Chairman Mat Staver said
in the statement.
^ Hopefully, now this case can go
to the Jury and she will be forced to pay damages for all the awful things she
did to this and many other couples. I can respect people’s viewpoints except
when they are hypocrites. Davis claimed to protect the “sanctity of marriage” by
refusing Marriage Licenses to Gay Couples yet she has been married 4 times to 3
different men so clearly she doesn’t see marriage as sacred. She seemed to only
find her “sanctity” when it came to openly discriminating against Homosexuals
and that is just plain wrong. ^
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.