From the DW:
“Did China's authoritarianism
actually help the coronavirus spread?”
As coronavirus cases in China
continue to increase, the country's leadership is coming under scrutiny for its
response. Authorities have been accused of covering up the outbreak when it
first emerged. China's top governing body, the Politburo Standing Committee,
was unusually self-critical on Tuesday following a special meeting addressing
the coronavirus outbreak. "The outbreak is a major test of China's system
and capacity for governance, and we must sum up the experience and draw a
lesson from it," read a statement from the meeting broadcast on state-run
television. The committee, headed by President Xi Jinping, also criticized
"deficiencies" in the country's healthcare and crisis management
system. The statements are a rare admission of guilt from China's Communist
Party, which is known more for cover-ups than candor. As the number of coronavirus infections and
deaths increase daily, China's leadership and system is facing a major test.
There is also evidence that Beijing has not been as transparent on the virus
outbreak as it wants people to believe.
Officials vs. reality: Zhong Nanshan, a doctor who helped expose the
Chinese government's cover-up of the SARS outbreak in 2003, was recently made
head of a special research panel assisting the National Health Commission on
tackling the ongoing coronavirus outbreak. Last week, Zhong's group issued an
optimistic prediction: Cases of coronavirus would peak "within a
week" and then begin to subside. It has become clear that Zhong's
prognosis was incorrect. As of Wednesday, February 5, the number of cases is
more than 24,000 and rising. The number of fatalities is approaching 500, most of
them in central China. And there are potentially tens of thousands of suspected
infections that have not been diagnosed in China due to the overburdened
healthcare system.
The coronavirus cover-up? The coronavirus outbreak is testing the cult
of personality built around President Xi, under which party subordinates are
wary of passing bad news onto superiors. Last week, the mayor of Wuhan, Zhou
Xianwang, told media that the city's crisis management had "not been good
enough," adding that informing the public about the first coronavirus
cases had been delayed for weeks due to "government regulations." To
read between the lines: Zhou needed permission first from Beijing. New reports
have also come to light about how the local government in Hubei province tried
to cover up the outbreak in December. One example that recently surfaced
involved a doctor in Wuhan who tried to warn colleagues on social media in
December about a mysterious SARS-like virus that he was seeing in patients. After
authorities in Wuhan picked up on his messages, he and his colleagues were
warned to stop "spreading rumors" and were temporarily detained. A few weeks later, it was reported that the
doctor who tried to sound the early warning had been infected with the
coronavirus. And a recent study funded by China's science ministry on the
transmission of the coronavirus published in the New England Journal of
Medicine showed that "human-to-human transmission had occurred among close
contacts" as early as the middle of December 2019. However, in the early
stages of the outbreak, there was little information about the virus, and no
precautionary warning, shared with the Chinese public. Lunar New Year's
preparations continued, and the dangerous, highly contagious virus began to
spread.
A disgruntled public: Now that the gravity of the coronavirus
outbreak has become clear, many Chinese, especially the younger generation, are
quietly criticizing the country's slide into authoritarian rule under President
Xi. "I am 100% certain that Communist Party cadres did not report news of
the virus outbreak because it would have ruined their chances of being
promoted," said a young man at a cafe in Beijing. "People like me, who only want the best
for our country, cannot talk openly anymore. One day we will start to ask why
we cannot access uncensored information online."
Trouble behind the 'great
firewall' Chinese censors play a nervous cat-and-mouse game with users behind
the "great firewall." For example, negative commentary under a health
committee live stream will be quickly erased. Despite Beijing's attempt to
control the narrative, many people comment on Chinese social media that they do
not trust information on the coronavirus coming from authorities and accuse
officials of an incompetent response. For example, the governor of Hubei
province drew a surge of criticism on Chinese social media for fudging the
numbers of protective face masks during a press conference. He told a
journalist that 10.8 billion masks had been produced. After he was handed a
stat sheet, he corrected himself that the real number was 1.8 billion. A few
minutes later, he had to admit that the correct number of masks was actually
only 1.8 million. "It's no wonder that this virus was able to spread with
such force," commented a user on China's version of twitter, Weibo. President
Xi has called for a "stronger guidance of public opinion" in China.
And the bigger the crisis, the more authorities will try and control the
message.
^ Communist Dictatorships have
never been known for doing what is right or good for its people or the world
around them and China is no exception. The main difference with this coronavirus is that it spread outside China and the Chinese Communist Party wasn't able to hide the facts from the world or its own people as it usually does. ^
https://www.dw.com/en/did-chinas-authoritarianism-actually-help-the-coronavirus-spread/a-52268341
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.