From the BBC:
“Afghan conflict: US and Taliban
sign deal to end 18-year war”
The US and the Taliban have
signed an "agreement for bringing peace" to Afghanistan after more
than 18 years of conflict. The US and Nato allies have agreed to withdraw all
troops within 14 months if the militants uphold the deal. President Trump said
it had been a "long and hard journey" in Afghanistan. "It's time
after all these years to bring our people back home," he said. Talks
between the Afghan government and the Taliban are due to follow. Under the
agreement, the militants also agreed not to allow al-Qaeda or any other
extremist group to operate in the areas they control. Speaking at the White
House, Mr Trump said the Taliban had been trying to reach an agreement with the
US for a long time. He said US troops had been killing terrorists in
Afghanistan "by the thousands" and now it was "time for someone
else to do that work and it will be the Taliban and it could be surrounding
countries". "I really believe the Taliban wants to do something to
show we're not all wasting time," Mr Trump added. "If bad things
happen, we'll go back with a force like no-one's ever seen." The US invaded
Afghanistan weeks after the September 2001 attacks in New York by the
Afghanistan-based al-Qaeda group. More than 2,400 US troops have been killed
during the conflict. About 12,000 are still stationed in the country. President
Trump has promised to put an end to the conflict.
What happened in Doha? The deal was signed by US special envoy
Zalmay Khalilzad and Taliban political chief Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar with US
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo as a witness. In a speech, Mr Pompeo urged the
militant group to "keep your promises to cut ties with al-Qaeda". Mr
Baradar said he hoped Afghanistan could now emerge from four decades of
conflict. "I hope that with the withdrawal of all foreign forces from
Afghanistan the Afghan nation under an Islamic regime will take its relief and
embark on a new prosperous life," he said. Meanwhile US Defence Secretary
Mark Esper was in the Afghan capital Kabul alongside Afghanistan's President
Ashraf Ghani - whose government did not take part in the US-Taliban talks. Mr
Esper said: "This is a hopeful moment, but it is only the beginning. The
road ahead will not be easy. Achieving lasting peace in Afghanistan will
require patience and compromise among all parties." He said the US would
continue to support the Afghan government. Mr Ghani said the country was
"looking forward to a full ceasefire". The government said it was
ready to negotiate with the Taliban.
What's in the agreement? Within the first 135 days of the deal
the US will reduce its forces in Afghanistan to 8,600, with allies also drawing
down their forces proportionately. The move would allow US President Donald
Trump to show that he has brought troops home ahead of the US presidential
election in November. The deal also provides for a prisoner swap. Some 5,000
Taliban prisoners and 1,000 Afghan security force prisoners would be exchanged
by 10 March, when talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government are due
to start. The US will also lift sanctions against the Taliban and work with the
UN to lift its separate sanctions against the group. In Kabul, activist Zahra
Husseini said she feared the deal could worsen the situation for women in
Afghanistan. "I don't trust the Taliban, and remember how they suppressed
women when they were ruling," the 28-year-old told AFP. "Today is a
dark day, and as I was watching the deal being signed, I had this bad feeling
that it would result in their return to power rather than in peace."
Landmark deal rife with
uncertainties: This historic deal has
been years in the making, as all sides kept seeking advantage on the
battlefield. The agreement is born of
America's determination to bring troops home and a recognition, at least by
some Taliban, that talks are the best route to return to Kabul. It's a
significant step forward, despite deep uncertainty and scepticism over where it
will lead. When the only alternative is unending war, many Afghans seem ready
to take this risk for peace. Taliban leaders say they've changed since their
harsh rule of the 1990s still seared in the memory of many, and most of all
Afghan women. This process will test the
Taliban, but also veteran Afghan leaders of the past, and a new generation
which has come of age in the last two decades and is hoping against hope for a
different future.
What reaction has there been?: UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres
stressed "the importance of sustaining the nationwide reduction in
violence, for the benefit of all Afghans" Nato Secretary-General Jens
Stoltenberg: "We went in together in 2001, we are going to adjust [troop
levels] together and when the time is right, we are going to leave together,
but we are only going to leave when conditions are right" UK Defence Secretary Ben Wallace: "I
welcome this small but important step towards the chance for Afghans to live in
peace, free from terrorism... We remain absolutely committed to building an
Afghanistan that is a strong partner for decades to come"
^ I have said this before and
still believe that this American withdrawal from Afghanistan is the exact same
as when Americans left South Vietnam in 1973. Back then the US was divided and
tired after fighting for 8 years and were trying to leave (i.e. Peace with
Honor) anyway we could. We left in April 1973 with the promise that we would
return if the North Vietnamese broke the agreement with the US and South Vietnam.
North Vietnam did break the agreement and the US did not come back in as they
said they would. We left South Vietnam to fend for itself until the Fall of
Saigon in April 1975. That is what will happen in Afghanistan. The US and NATO
will leave, the Taliban will take control again and impose their strict
religious dictatorship and Afghanistan will return to the awful 1990s. The only
difference is that this time I don’t see the Taliban allowing Al-Qaida or ISIS
to base themselves in Afghanistan as they (Al-Qaida) did. That way the Taliban
will be able to beat, stone and kill whomever they want within Afghanistan and no
other country - especially the US - will care since they won’t be a security
threat to the outside world. ^
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51689443
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.