Expanding Ban

From the BBC:

“Trump says he plans to expand US travel ban”

President Donald Trump said he plans to add countries to his existing travel ban to bar more foreign nationals from entry into the US.  The current ban - signed by Mr Trump two years ago - closed US borders to citizens from seven countries, most with Muslim majorities. Libya, Iran, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, North Korea and Venezuela are affected.  Countries from Europe, Africa and Asia are being considered for the expanded order, according to US media. Mr Trump confirmed that more countries will be added. "You see what's going on in the world, our country has to be safe," he told reporters at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Wednesday.  He gave no further details on which countries would be targeted or how many, but said that the information would be released "very shortly". The expanded list, first reported by Politico, may include Belarus, Myanmar (also known as Burma), Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Sudan and Tanzania. Different versions of this list have been considered among the administration for weeks, US media said. Reports of the expanded ban come just after the three-year anniversary of the initial order. The controversial ban, signed by the president seven days after he took office in January 2017, initially excluded travellers from seven majority-Muslim countries. The list was modified following a series of court challenges and now restricts some citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Venezuela and North Korea.  In June 2018, the Supreme Court upheld Mr Trump's ban, rejecting findings from lower courts that deemed the ban unconstitutional.  White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said in a statement that the administration had no new planned announcements related to the ban, which he described as "profoundly successful in protecting our country and raising the security baseline around the world".  "Common sense and national security both dictate that if a country wants to fully participate in U.S. immigration programs, they should also comply with all security and counter-terrorism measures," Mr Gidley says. "Because we do not want to import terrorism or any other national security threat into the United States." Critics of the ban have noted that major attacks such as the 9/11 New York attacks, the Boston marathon bombing and the Orlando nightclub attack were carried out by people from countries not on the list or by US-born attackers. And unlike the initial list, the possible additions include countries with a strong relationship to the US. Nigeria, for example, is a counter-terrorism partner for the US. 

^ I understood why a ban was made on people from (or had travelled to) Libya, Iran, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, North Korea and Venezuela. Libya, Syria and Yemen were added because of their civil wars and instability. Iran was added because of its anti-American stance and the fact that the US hasn’t had diplomatic relations with them since 1980. Somalia was added because of its instability. North Korea was added because of its anti-American stance and the fact that the US has never had diplomatic relations with them. Venezuela was added because of its anti-American stance. As for the proposed countries to be included in a new travel ban on people from (or had travelled to) Myanmar, Eritrea, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Sudan and Tanzania I am not sure about them. Myanmar could be added because of how their government has treated the Rohingya people  . Eritrea could be added because of its human rights record. The other countries seem to be out-of-place in any proposed addition to the travel ban. Sudan just recently removed its dictator from power. Nigeria is working with the US to stop terrorists in Africa. Kyrgyzstan is not much of a player (good or bad.) Tanzania seems like a normal country and Belarus is slowly, but surely trying to open itself more to the West instead of being a tightly-controlled dictatorship that relies heavily on Russia. To add countries to a travel ban just because you can is senseless. I will fully support a travel ban on countries that I believe have a legitimate reason (civil wars, instability, human rights abuses, no diplomatic relations, etc.) to be including in a ban, but not on countries where there is no real reason. ^

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51210953