From the DW:
“My Europe: The impossible museum
of communism”
Thirty years after the country's
dictator was ousted, Bulgaria is debating the need for a museum on communism.
Eastern Europeans have very different approaches when dealing with the past,
writes Ivaylo Ditchev. If you visit
Bulgaria's historical museums, you will see more exhibits detailing the legends
of ancient Thracians than of the communist era that still influences life
today. But how should we remember
communism? There are several approaches. New democracies tend to stage the
horrors of totalitarian violence, such as the Museum of Communist History in
Prague, the Museum of Terror in Budapest, the Gulag-Museum in Moscow, or the
museum in Vilnius that commemorates victims of communist mass murders. Visitors
encounter prison cells, interrogation or torture scenes, photos of victims, and
stories from survivors.
Terror, glorification or bizarre
comedy?
The contrasting version glorifies
this period. Museums of this type are to be found in Belgrade, or in Vietnam's
capital Hanoi, which commemorates the fight against the US. The mausoleums of
Lenin and Mao, the VDNH spaces in Moscow, and the communist theme park in
Wuhan, China, aim to showcase the monumental accomplishments of the regimes. The third type of museum playfully portrays
communism's hasty and meager modernization as exotic. Places like the GDR
Museum in Berlin display curious objects of everyday life: ugly toys, old
brands of sweets, or the legendary Ampelmännchen (the typical figure at the
green and red lights at pedestrian crossings). In Warsaw you can visit reconstructed
apartments that ironically compare the material world of then to now. Statue
parks, such as the one in Budapest, draw a comedic surrealist effect by
reproducing similar pathetic ideological monuments and placing them side by
side. Such museums are usually criticized for normalizing the communist era and
replacing moral judgement with humor. After all, there is nothing specifically
"criminal" about the legendary East German car Trabant or the
Bulgarian pepper roasting device known as "chushkopek," which was
voted "Bulgaria's household revolution of the 20th century" on
national TV.
Too early for some — for others,
too late
Finally, the recollection of
communism is activated through art; artistic action was an indirect way of
mocking the regime in the past. Today, in places where the past does not seem
to be really gone, individual artistic groups try to overcome moral apathy. The
bunkers of Albanian dictator Enver Hoxha have become the setting of various
performances. In Romania, Ceausescu's former "Palace of the People"
hosts, among other institutions, a museum of contemporary art. The former
realms of power are made visible through aesthetic blasphemy, provoking new
debates. Bulgaria, for its part,
hesitated over each of these approaches — and never created a serious memorial
institution that dealt with the communist period. That's because it was always
too early for some, while for others, it was too late.
Former communists still present
in politics
A museum underscoring the
ideological terror in the country never materialized, as former communists
continue to play a crucial role in politics to this day. The only major
anti-communist ritual was the demolition of a mausoleum dedicated to Bulgarian
communist leader Georgi Dimitrov, a move that was met with anger and mockery. There
were not as many victims of communist violence in Bulgaria as in other
countries behind the Iron Curtain. There were no brutal crackdowns on mass
protests similar to those in 1956 in Budapest or 1968 in Prague. Furthermore,
the political transition period of the 1990s, after the fall of communism, was
much more difficult in Bulgaria than in many other former Eastern bloc
countries. Memories recalling the terror during the establishment of the regime
were blurred by more recent traumas. The "sovereign" version of
communism wasn't suited for Bulgaria, known as the USSR's closest satellite.
Bulgarian dictator Todor Zhivkov had even suggested twice that his country
should become part of the Soviet Union, which was fortunately rejected by
Moscow. The house where Zhivkov was born is among the few museums that portray,
albeit cautiously, Bulgaria's communist era in a positive light.
Irony misunderstood
In Bulgaria, the everyday version
of socialism is presented by a number of amateurs, who display their
collections of nostalgic objects. Some of these have grown into commercial
projects, such as the Retro Museum or the Red Apartment, where people can hear
comical stories about the different shabby objects owned by the average
Bulgarian family. Such exhibitions target foreign tourists, whose comments in
the museum guestbook seem to miss the irony of the exhibitions:
"Venceremos! Long live communism!" So why do few Bulgarians visit
here? Aside from the expensive tickets, the objects displayed are still a part
of everyday life for many Bulgarians — making it difficult for one to maintain
an aesthetic distance. The only
state-subsidized museum in Sofia is dedicated to the art of socialist era. It
brings together propaganda and high-quality artwork, nomenclature artists and
victims of the regime. A clumsy compromise, which was criticized for lacking
uniformity and purpose. Sofia now plans to imitate the Romanians and transform
the tunnels under the former mausoleum into an art space, the main argument
being that it will attract tourists. Isn't it a strange idea to commemorate an
issue or event by imitating someone else's way of remembering? All of these
remembrance projects in the post-communist world end up a mimicry. Bulgaria is
simply at the end of the line. It has not been able to face its past alone —
and anxiously looks around to imitate the next original approach to national
remembrance. Ivaylo Ditchev is a
professor of cultural anthropology at the University of Sofia in Bulgaria. He
has lectured in Germany, France and the United States, among other places.
^ Communism was used differently
in every country it was used in, but the one constant no matter where it was/is
used in is that Communism relies on the use of terror, torture and death to keep
the people “in-line.”) That is why it is so important to teach younger
generations, as well as those of us in the older generation who never lived under
Communism, to understand the harsh realities. There needs to be more Museums
and Memorials about Communism – especially as it pertains to a certain country’s
history. There should also be some kind of program to record the experiences of
those who actually lived under Communism – both its victims and its perpetrators.
That way we have a first-hand record of what Communist life was actually like
outside the history books. ^
https://www.dw.com/en/my-europe-the-impossible-museum-of-communism/a-51203126
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.