From VOA:
“IRS Struggles as US Taxpayers
File Their Returns”
Taxpayers across the United
States were required to file their federal tax returns by April 18, and they
did so amid a barrage of news about the Internal Revenue Service facing a
significant backlog of tax returns, a staffing shortage and uncertainty about
its funding. That the U.S.’s tax authority is in bad shape is no secret. Nor
are the reasons behind its troubles. The agency’s budget has been slashed by
18% over the past decade, and a yearslong hiring freeze means that as
experienced auditors and other specialists retire, the pipeline of workers
trained to take their places is running dry. The agency is facing an excess of
7 million returns from last year that still haven’t been processed. And the
Biden administration has estimated that some $600 billion in taxes owed by the
wealthiest Americans go uncollected every year because the agency doesn’t have
the manpower to audit returns for compliance with basic tax law. Additionally,
funding cuts have left the IRS playing catch-up when it comes to technology.
Agency employees must manually enter information from paper returns, even
though the technology exists that would allow the process to be automated.
Pandemic added
responsibilities The advent of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 created a
whole new set of challenges for the agency. In addition to having to navigate
pandemic-related lockdowns, it was given the task of administering much of the
relief effort, including stimulus checks, and later, the implementation of a
refundable child tax credit that sent millions of Americans monthly payments.
“The incredible challenges with our system (are) how much we ask of it,”
William Gentry, a professor of economics at Williams College, told VOA. “We
don't just ask it to raise revenue. We ask it to serve all sorts of social
functions.” The agency finally saw a budget increase in the current
fiscal year, to $12.6 billion from just under $12 billion the previous year.
But because it has no certainty about its future budget prospects, IRS
Commissioner Charles P. Rettig has warned lawmakers that it is difficult for
the agency to plan for the long term.
International comparisons As
troubled as the IRS may appear to U.S. citizens, it is far more effective and
efficient than tax authorities in many countries around the world, experts say.
This is especially the case in developing nations, where the administrative
capacity to operate something as complicated as a nationwide income tax
assessment is limited. Daniel Bunn, executive vice president of the Tax
Foundation, a think tank in Washington, told VOA that in many developing
countries, it is practically impossible for the government to track economic
activity in a way that makes taxing personal income effective. “There's
a decent amount of activity that goes on in the cash economy, or the gray
economy, or the black market — whatever term you use,” he said. Because
governments can only tax what they can measure, many developing countries rely
on taxation of established businesses for a much higher share of their overall
revenue than countries like the U.S. Bunn said that while developed countries
rely on business taxes for only about 9% of their total tax revenue, developing
nations average about 16%.
Consumption taxes A unique
feature of the federal tax system in the U.S. is its lack of a consumption tax
component. Most other countries — developed and developing alike — use a
value-added tax system, which adds incremental tax payments on goods and
services at each stage of their production. “For historical reasons,
we've left consumption taxes — the taxes you would pay at the cash register —
to the states through retail sales taxes,” Gentry said. Economists are
often frustrated by the lack of a value-added tax (VAT) in the U.S., which is
seen as being more efficient than taxes on personal income. “They
distort economic activity less because they don't affect investment,” Thornton
Matheson, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Institute, told VOA. “They don't
tax business profits, so they don't affect investment. They can affect labor
decisions, but generally speaking, a VAT is more efficient than labor taxes,
like the personal income tax, payroll taxes and Social Security taxes.”
Administrative ‘nightmare’ As
much as they believe a VAT would be a better way for the United States to raise
some of its revenue, experts acknowledge that the political effort involved
would be enormous. In addition to finding a way to replace or reallocate
the revenue that consumption taxes already deliver to the individual states, it
would require rationalizing the disparate systems that have developed over the
years. Some states have no sales tax, while others tax different things. “It
would require harmonizing all the states, and they don't want to harmonize,”
said Gentry. “New Hampshire doesn't have a sales tax. Tennessee taxes food, but
Massachusetts doesn't tax food. And so, there are all these complicated
choices.” He added, “And then you start selling goods online, and it
starts getting to be a nightmare.”
^ You can’t feel sad for the IRS –
they never do when you are late – but I do feel bad for the Americans who filed
and are still waiting for their Refunds. ^
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.