From Press Herald:
“N.H. court upholds rejection of
Northern Pass hydropower transmission line”
The New Hampshire Supreme Court
on Friday upheld a state committee’s rejection of a proposal to bring a
hydropower transmission line from Canada to markets in southern New England,
possibly dealing a fatal blow to a plan that has raised concerns among
communities and environmentalists that it would harm the region’s tourism
industry and hurt property values. The court rejected the argument of the
utility behind the Northern Pass project that the Site Evaluation Committee
never considered all the evidence, as required by law, or the possible ways the
company could mitigate opponents’ concerns. The energy company, Eversource,
wanted the court to remand the case back to the committee for reconsideration
following its decision last year to reject the application. “We have reviewed
the record and conclude that the Subcommittee’s findings are supported by
competent evidence and are not erroneous as a matter of law,” the court wrote
in its ruling. “Accordingly, we hold that the petitioners have not sustained
their burden on appeal to show that the Subcommittee’s order was unreasonable
or unlawful.” Although Eversource could try to submit a new plan to the
evaluation committee, the company has lost most of its political support in the
state including one of the most vocal backers — Republican Gov. Chris Sununu. “The
Court has made it clear – it is time to move on,” Sununu said in a statement.
“There are still many clean energy projects that lower electric rates to
explore and develop for New Hampshire and the rest of New England.” Eversource
said it was evaluating its options. “We are deeply disappointed that the New
Hampshire Supreme Court reached this decision, but we are grateful for their
consideration and deliberation in this case. Northern Pass was the most
advanced project to bring abundant low-cost, clean energy into the region, and
this outcome is an unfortunate setback to our efforts to advance an affordable
clean energy future for our customers,” the company said in a statement. Lawyers
representing 13 municipalities, the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire
Forests and other opponents had that argued Eversource failed to produce
sufficient and credible evidence to make its case on such matters as the
impacts on property values, tourism and land use. Several argued other projects
in Maine and Vermont already are being considered to bring hydropower from
Canada, proving that it isn’t necessary to build 192-miles of transmission
lines through New Hampshire. “Today’s Supreme Court decision is the right one
for New Hampshire,” said Tom Irwin, vice president and director of Conservation
Law Foundation New Hampshire. “Eversource has been nothing but dismissive of
community concerns throughout this process and that alone is enough to reject
Northern Pass for good. This project has always been bad for the state and
Eversource needs to move on.”
^ This is a huge win for New
Hampshire. Northern Pass would have brought cheaper electricity from Quebec,
Canada to Massachusetts and other States, but the only thing New Hampshire
would get is a ripped-up landscape. ^
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.