From the BBC:
“Srebrenica massacre: Dutch state
'10% liable' for 350 deaths”
What happened at Srebrenica?
Explained in under two minutes The Dutch supreme court has upheld a ruling that
the Netherlands was partially responsible for 350 deaths in Bosnia's Srebrenica
massacre. The court said the state had 10% liability, as this was the
probability that its soldiers could have prevented the killings. Bosnian Serb
forces killed a total of 8,000 Muslim men in the town of Srebrenica in 1995. The
Dutch had been guarding a UN safe zone when it was overrun. It is rare for a
state to be held responsible for failures in UN peacekeeping work, but the court
emphasised that the Netherlands bore "very limited liability". In
2002, a report into the Netherland's role in Srebrenica caused the entire Dutch
government to resign. Women from the Mothers of Srebrenica campaigning group
said they were disappointed by the ruling The court ruled that if Dutch forces had given
350 men hiding in the UN compound the chance to stay, there was just a 10%
chance they would not have fallen into the hands of the Serbs, and so the Dutch
state should be liable for only that proportion of the damages suffered by the
bereaved. The final verdict draws a line under years of legal battles between
the Dutch state and the plaintiffs - a group of victims' relatives known as the
Mothers of Srebrenica. The case was escalated to the highest court because the
state wanted to be cleared of responsibility, while the Mothers of Srebrenica
wanted it to be held accountable for all 8,000 deaths in the genocide. An
appeals court had previously set the liability at 30%, but the supreme court's
ruling has drastically reduced that figure. In the front row of court sat the
women who call themselves the Mothers of Srebrenica. A formidable trio who lost husbands, sons and
fathers in the Srebrenica massacre and have made this pursuit of justice their
mission in life. Sitting a few seats
away from them, I was surprised these normally vocal women remained silent as
the judgment was read out. When we got outside, one of them, Munira Subasic,
explained why. "It was a
humiliation again. Just like in 1995 the Dutch were in charge, and we didn't
know what was going on." The
Netherlands' highest court had failed to provide them with a live translation. Bringing back those memories of the moments
before the massacre when they were herded into groups by the Dutch peacekeepers
and evacuated through tunnels, with deportation buses on one side with Bosnian
Serb forces. It was at this point the men were plucked from the crowds and
taken away to be executed. Asked if
Munira felt the acknowledgment of 10% Dutch culpability for the deaths of the
350 Muslim men who'd been secretly hiding in the compound was a vindication she
shook her head. "I only got a few bones from my son back, about 3%, the
rest is still missing." Former
members of the Dutch forces (known as Dutchbat) attending the hearing expressed
their disappointment over the ruling. Veteran Remko de Bruijne told the BBC it
would bring little comfort to relatives of those who died, and called it
"a disgrace".
What happened at Srebrenica?
During the Bosnian War
(1992-1995), the Serb army was engaged in an ethnic-cleansing operation. Thousands of Muslims sought safety in
Srebrenica, which the UN was protecting with Dutch forces, but the area fell in
July 1995 during a Serb offensive led by General Ratko Mladic.
Ratko Mladic, the 'Butcher of
Bosnia'
When the Serb army moved in to
Srebrenica, approximately 20,000 Muslims - mostly women, children and the
infirm - sought refuge in the Dutch compound in nearby Potocari. As the
violence escalated, the Dutch surrendered and later agreed to help the Serbs
load Muslim refugees on to buses.
What about the 350 men?
They were inside the compound,
but according to the ruling, the Serbs were not aware of them at the time. The
court said the Dutch force had "failed to offer these 350 male refugees
the choice to stay where they were, even though that would have been
possible". They were eventually among those made to leave the base. The
court said "this failure on Dutchbat's part denied these male refugees the
chance to stay out of the hands of the Bosnian Serbs". It said the chance
that they would have survived if they had stayed "was small but not
negligible". A lower court had previously
ruled that the Dutch were liable for the deaths. In 2017, an appeals court largely upheld the
ruling, but reduced the responsibility to 30%. A figure for the compensation
has not yet been set. The Mothers of
Srebrenica had also originally sought acknowledgement and compensation from the
UN as well, but the organisation was ruled to be immune from prosecution.
Timeline of Srebrenica siege
- 6-8 July 1995: Bosnian Serb
forces start shelling Srebrenica enclave
- 9 July: Bosnian Serbs step up
shelling; thousands of Bosnian Muslim refugees flee to Srebrenica
- 10 July: Dutch peacekeepers
request UN air support after Bosnian Serbs shell Dutch positions. Large crowds
of refugees gather around Dutch positions
- 11 July: More than 20,000
refugees flee to main Dutch base at Potocari. Serbs threaten to kill Dutch
hostages and shell refugees after Dutch F-16 fighters bomb Serb positions.
Bosnian Serb commander Ratko Mladic enters Srebrenica and delivers ultimatum
that Muslims must hand over weapons
- 12 July: An estimated 23,000
women and children are deported to Muslim territory; men aged 12-77 taken
"for interrogation" and held in trucks and warehouses
- 13 July: First killings of
unarmed Muslims take place near village of Kravica. Peacekeepers hand over some
5,000 Muslims sheltering at Dutch base in exchange for the release of 14 Dutch
peacekeepers held by Bosnian Serbs
- 14 July: Reports of massacres
start to emerge
^ It does seem odd for the Dutch
Supreme Court to only accept responsibility for 10% of those killed. If the Dutch
Peacekeepers in Bosnia were only tasked with saving 10% of the people in their
coverage area then I could understand this ruling, but as far as I understand
they were takes with saving 100% of the people in their “Safe Haven.” ^
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-49042372
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.