From the BBC:
“Russia election: Putin's
party wins election marred by fraud claims”
Russian President Vladimir
Putin's party has won a parliamentary majority following an election marred by
reports of fraud. With almost all of the votes counted, the United Russia party
had won nearly 50% of the vote, marking a slight drop in support from the
previous election. Mr Putin's biggest critics were barred from running, and
there were reports of ballot stuffing and forced voting Russia's electoral commission rejected claims
of widespread irregularities. With more than 99% of votes counted, United
Russia's closest rival, the Communist Party, had about 19% of the vote,
according to the election commission. United Russia's victory means it will
have more than two-thirds of the 450 seats in the country's parliament,
officials say. However, despite easily retaining its majority in parliament,
the party did lose some ground. In 2016, the party won 54% of the vote. The Communists,
who broadly support Mr Putin's initiatives in the parliament, saw their support
grow by about 6%. But their leader, Gennady Zyuganov, has alleged widespread
violations, including ballot-stuffing, according to the Associated Press news
agency. The final results will be announced on Friday, Russia's Electoral
Commission head Ella Pamfilova said. Concerns over living standards and
allegations of corruption from jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny have likely
affected support for Mr Putin's party. But he remains popular with many
Russians who credit him with standing up to the West and restoring national
pride. In a TV address on Monday, Mr Putin thanked voters for their trust and
said United Russia had confirmed its role as the leading party. Supporters of
Mr Navalny have called for protests and condemned the result as illegitimate.
Analysis box by Steve
Rosenberg, Moscow correspondent For Russia's party of power, it's job done.
United Russia is confident that it has retained its parliamentary majority,
albeit with a slightly smaller share of the vote than last time round. Judging
by last night's celebrations at party headquarters, the party faithful are more
than pleased with the result. United Russia insists it won this race fair and
square. But even before the first ballots were cast in the marathon
vote, this election looked anything but fair. The Kremlin's most vocal critics
had been barred from running - among them, supporters of Mr Navalny. Then
there was the voting process itself. Over three days of polling there were
allegations of widespread electoral fraud, including ballot box stuffing and
threats against election observers. Video widely shared online showed
people stuffing papers into ballot boxes. Mr Navalny and his allies had
called on Russians to vote tactically, in many cases for Communist Party
candidates they believed could defeat incumbents from United Russia. But this
has not prevented the Kremlin's party from securing a large slice of the new
parliament. The election saw a number of cities introduce electronic
voting. One such city was the capital, Moscow, where some Communist
Party candidates lost leads when electronic votes were declared at the last
minute. "I know that such a result is simply not possible,"
one defeated Communist candidate, Mikhail Lobanov, wrote on Twitter. For
the first time since 1993, election observers from the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) were not present due to limitations
imposed by Russian authorities. A European Union spokesman said the elections
were not properly monitored, nor conducted in a free and fair way. The
governments of the UK, Germany and the US echoed this.
'Significant violations' On
Monday, independent vote monitoring group Golos - which the Russian authorities
have branded "a foreign agent" - said it had received about 5,000
reports of possible voting violations. Russia's interior ministry,
meanwhile, told reporters it had not registered any "significant
violations". During the three-day vote, videos published on social
media had shown long queues outside some polling stations. Interfax news agency
reported this was especially the case outside police stations. But the Kremlin
spokesman rejected claims that it was an indication of people being put under
pressure to vote. But Golos said it had received "numerous
messages" from people who said they were being forced by their employers
to vote, as well as allegations of electoral fraud. In parts of east
Ukraine controlled by Russian-backed separatists, residents with Russian
citizenship were allowed to vote, with some crossing the border to visit
Russian polling stations.
“I don't see the point in
voting' There has also been anger after a Smart Voting app, devised by Mr
Navalny, was removed from Apple and Google stores on the day Russians started
voting. Rauthorities had threatened the two companies with big fines if
they refused to drop the app, which told users who could unseat ruling party
candidates. It is not yet clear whether the app had any impact on how
people voted. "This is truly unbelievable," Mr Navalny's
spokesperson Kira Yarmysh told AFP. "I remember the feeling in 2011, when
they stole the election. The same is happening right now." Mr
Navalny led mass protests against the government in 2011 following parliamentary
elections critics said were riddled with fraud. One Moscow pensioner,
who gave his name only as Anatoly, told Reuters news agency he voted for the
ruling party as he appreciated Mr Putin's efforts to restore Russia's influence
on the world stage. "Countries like the United States and Britain
more or less respect us now like they respected the Soviet Union in the 1960s
and 70s. The Anglo-Saxons only understand the language of force," he said.
But with official turnout reported to be about 52%, there were signs of
widespread indifference. "I don't see the point in voting,"
said one Moscow hairdresser who gave her name as Irina. "It's all been
decided for us anyway."
^ No one (Russian or non-Russian)
should be surprised that Putin and his Party won. It was going to happen long
before the Election was even decided on. ^
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.