Healthcare: 6 Things

From the USA Today:

"The health law: Post-enrollment, 6 things to watch for"

Just because open enrollment for people who buy their own health insurance formally closes March 31, it doesn't mean debate over the health law will take a hiatus. After more than four years of strident rhetoric, evidence about how the law is actually working is starting to trickle in. Here are six things to watch before the next enrollment period begins in November:

1. How many enrolled, really?

Rightly or wrongly, this figure has become a yardstick by which some are measuring the law's success. But no one can give an accurate accounting yet. President Obama announced Thursday that the administration had hit the 6 million enrollment mark — the revised projection of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (which had initially forecast 7 million before the disastrous rollout of the online marketplaces last October). As of March 1, another 4.4 million consumers had been deemed eligible for Medicaid, the state-federal insurance program for low-income Americans.

Final tallies of enrollees may come in mid-April, but those figures won't be the last word either. That's because not everyone who signs up for a private plan will pay their first premium, and they aren't covered unless they do. In addition, consumers who signed up through insurers or on nongovernment sites are not yet included in the count. And finally, the administration on March 26 relaxed the deadline for some people, including those who encountered computer glitches while trying to enroll.

2. Who has signed up?

Prior enrollment reports have shown the vast majority to be 35 and older with more women than men. Much attention will be focused on the coveted demographic, ages 18 to 34, who have accounted for just over a quarter of enrollees. While insurers hope for young enrollees, they can also benefit if older ones are in good health. Despite all the attention on national numbers, state and local enrollment figures are more important in any case because insurance markets are state-based, and big numbers or youthful enrollment in some places won't make up for shortfalls in others. State markets are expected to vary significantly, with some seeing bigger premium increases next year because they have older and sicker enrollees, while others with a more robust mix are more likely to see rates hold steady.

3. Has the law put a dent in the number of uninsured?

This is a key question for a law designed to reduce the nation's 48 million uninsured. It will take a while, though, to track changes. For one thing, no information has been released about how many of those who signed up were previously uninsured. Also, data so far includes those who signed up through the state and federal online markets, but not those who purchased coverage elsewhere, or who enrolled in job-based plans they had previously turned down. A McKinsey consulting firm telephone survey in February found that 27% of those purchasing coverage were previously uninsured, while a Gallup poll in March found the uninsurance rate falling. Both studies have limits, however, and cannot be considered the final word. Right now, "we have a pretty good sense the number of uninsured has gone down, but not a clue as to by how much," said Larry Levitt of the Kaiser Family Foundation. (Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent program of the foundation.)

4. Will insurance plans, prices and rules be the same in the next enrollment period which begins Nov. 15?

No. Right now, insurers are assessing their new enrollment and associated health care costs for the first three months of the year, which will help them set rates for next year. Most of them must submit those rates for review by state regulators by spring or early summer. But don't expect to see the new rates until next fall, just before open enrollment begins. Analysts say much will depend on who enrolled this year and how healthy they turn out to be. Some predict big premium increases in some areas, while others say insurers are protected from the impact of large claims by provisions of the law that insulate them from unexpectedly high medical costs. Rule changes for next year will also factor into rate decisions. Insurers warn they may have to raise prices if they're forced to offer greater selection of doctors, hospitals and drugs in their networks.

5. How will insurance change for those of us who get it through our employers?

The answer depends on what your employer is doing now. If you work for a large company and have job-based insurance, your employer will probably keep offering it, according to most surveys.

It's trickier to say what will happen for workers at firms that don't offer coverage. That's because all employers were given a pass this year on rules that say if they don't offer health coverage to full-time workers, they could face fines. The Obama administration then extended that exemption until 2016 for firms with 50 to 99 workers. (Those with fewer than 50 workers were never included and don't face fines.) But starting next year, employers with 100 or more workers must offer insurance to at least 70% of workers — rather than the 95% originally called for under the law — or face fines.

For those with job-based coverage, the health law is also expected to accelerate existing trends, including rising deductibles and copayments for employees. Employers are making those moves to slow rising premium costs and to shift more expenses to workers. Analysts also expect to see an increase in workplace wellness programs, which often give workers incentives to participate. The health law allows employers to offer larger incentives, or up to 30% of the cost of coverage. That means workers who choose not to participate or, in some cases, to meet certain health goals, will pay more toward their coverage.

6. What impact will the rollout have on congressional elections?

Look for lots of advertising in vulnerable Democratic districts heading into the fall. If Republicans win control of the Senate (the GOP is expected to keep control of the House, if not increase its majority) that could mean health law defunding bills passed by the House will get a Senate floor vote. While Obama would surely veto them — and neither chamber is expected to have a veto-proof majority — the bills would keep anti-health law legislation front and center as both parties battle for the White House in 2016.

^ It seems that there are millions of these kinds of "helpful" points to Obamacare that seem to change by the hour. That's because no one from the President -down seems to have a clue or a care to what is going on or when it will happen. It was their goal to change health care in the US and they did that as quickly and half-hazardly as possible and now ordinary people are meant to pick-up the pieces or be fined for not understanding what even those in power do not understand. The US still has the best hospitals, doctors, research in the world but now has one of the worst health care systems. That is the main legacy Obama has given the country. Rather than fix the sinking ship he merely put some loose patches on it and added more "passengers" to the already overflowing  system. Those patches are already starting to come off and reveal the huge holes. Imagine the Titanic already partially submerged under water. Rather than putting people in the life boats the Government is adding more and more people to the side that is above water until the whole ship goes under. The health care system needed to be changed, that was a given. But what was done to change it was done too quickly without the though of the consequences, how it would be implemented or how it would affect the people who have to use it. ^

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/03/30/obamacare-enrollment-costs-uninsured-insurance/7015367/