From the CBC:
“Companies are implementing
vaccine mandates. Can employees reject them?”
Federal and provincial
governments, private businesses as well as Canada's biggest banks have in
recent weeks announced plans to implement mandatory vaccination policies for
many of their returning staff. These
vaccine mandates require their employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19. But
do employers have the right to impose such mandates? What if employees refuse? CBC
News looks at the legal issues these mandates raise.
Do companies face legal
hurdles in imposing vaccine mandates? That will likely depend on the particular
circumstances that an employer and employee find themselves in, says
Toronto-based employment lawyer Alex Lucifero. And the law will differ, he
says, based upon a number of factors — for example, the particular industry, or
whether the employees are unionized. "There'll be a bunch of
different factors that will be taken into consideration," he said. "I
imagine eventually there will potentially be different laws for different
industries or groups of employees. For that reason, it makes it extremely
complex and there is no 'one size fits all' answer." Employment
lawyer Adam Savaglio, a partner with Scarfone Hawkins LLP in Hamilton, Ont.
told CBC News that there are many misconceptions and incorrect assumptions
about the law around vaccination mandates. "They can't necessarily
compel, but they can certainly ask for evidence of vaccination because they
have an underlying obligation to that worker and others in the workplace to
provide a healthy and safe workplace," he said in an interview. However,
Toronto-based employment lawyer Howard Levitt said that in Canadian law, safety
always trumps privacy. That means employers will be permitted by the courts and
arbitrators to have compulsory vaccination policies, except for religious and
medical exemptions.
Can a company fire an employee
who refuses to get vaccinated? "I believe they have the rights as an
employer to mandate it and to terminate people who won't comply," Levitt
said. Lucifero said someone who refuses to adhere to an employer's
vaccine mandate because of a medical condition or religious belief cannot be
fired because that would be considered discrimination under the human rights
code. "But the reality is that your employer can let you go because
you haven't been vaccinated. An employer can actually let you go for no
particular reason at all. That's what we call a 'without cause'
termination," he said. "Your employer doesn't even need a
reason to let you go as long as the proper amount of severance is paid."
What about charter rights to
protect me if I don't want to be vaccinated? What's important for people to
understand, says constitutional expert Wayne MacKay, professor emeritus of law
at Dalhousie University, is that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms only
applies to government action. That means, when it comes to vaccine mandates,
the charter only applies for government workers refusing such a decree. "It
doesn't apply to private businesses or [a] private individual's actions,"
he said. "Statute law does, privacy laws, human rights codes, those kind
of things. But only government action is
restricted by the charter."
What charter rights might
apply to vaccine mandates? There are potentially at least three sections of
the charter that could be used by a government employee to challenge a vaccine
mandate, including Section 7 — the right to life, liberty and security of the
person. That could be cited to challenge "a policy that seems to
coerce people into getting vaccinated," wrote University of B.C. law
professor Debra Parkes and University of Ottawa law professor Carissima Mathen
in a recent editorial. However,
Bryan Thomas, adjunct professor at the University of Ottawa's Centre for Health
Law, Policy & Ethics, says he
believes challenges under Section 7 are unlikely to be successful
because that section doesn't protect an individual's economic interests or
"your ability to retain a job." Section 15, which offers
protection from discrimination, could also be invoked but Thomas says he
believes it would fail as an argument because an employer is not actually
discounting anyone's interests. "[They're] making up kind of this a
legitimate form of discrimination and saying, you know, you unvaccinated person
pose a great risk to yourself and to others by entering the workplace,"
said Thomas. 2A, the so-called religious exemption, or freedom of
conscience, could also be applicable. Parkes and Mathen wrote that this
an underdeveloped area of charter law, but could be relevant "where a
person has a sincerely held belief that the vaccination is harmful to their
health or, in some other way, deeply wrong." But Thomas said
someone who is vaccine hesitant, for example, couldn't claim that's a freedom
of conscience issue. "The courts have a more rigorous test or
standard for conscience," he said. "It has to be something that's
akin to a religion in your life."
^ This didn’t really give a final
answer over vaccine mandates, but did basically say any company can fire any
employee for any reason at any time. ^
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/vaccination-mandates-employees-rights-1.6142584
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.