Rescued Law

From the BBC:

"Californian law change means pet shops can sell only rescued animals"

California is set to become the first state in the US to ban the sale of non-rescue animals in pet shops. The new law, known as AB 485, takes effect on 1 January. Any businesses violating it face a $500 (£400) fine. The change means cats, dogs and rabbits sold by retailers cannot be sourced from breeders, only from animal shelters. Animal rights groups have heralded it as a step forward against so-called "kitten factories" and "puppy mills". They say the current "high-volume" industries, where pets are bred for profit, can lead to inhumane treatment and long-term emotional and physical health problems in some animals.  The new state-wide law, approved in late 2017, will now require shops to maintain sufficient records of where they sourced each animal, for periodic checks by authorities. It does not, however, affect sales from private breeders or owner-to-owner sales. Some Californian shop owners have raised concern the law could put them out of business. The measure has also seen resistance from the American Kennel Club, which said it limits pet owners.  According to American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) estimates, more than 6.5 million pets enter shelters across the country every year, of which about 1.5 million are put down.  The California assembly member who introduced the legislation, Patrick O'Donnell, has insisted the legislation is not just "a big win" for "four-legged friends", but for California taxpayers too, as they spend hundreds of millions on sheltering animals across the state.  A couple hoping to adopt a cat from a San Diego shelter on Friday, told NBC News the move was a step forward for the state. "It takes the emphasis off the profit of animals and puts the emphasis back on caring for and getting these cats and dogs a good home," prospective owner Mitch Kentdotson said. AB 485 is the first state-wide law of its kind, although other places have enacted similar regulations on pet sales on a local level. Earlier this month, a similar ban on third-party puppy and kitten sales was confirmed in England. Lucy's law, named after a mistreated cavalier King Charles spaniel, also aims to combat low-welfare animal breeding. 

^ Usually I do agree with what the lawmakers in California do - they tend to be ultra-liberal and focus on weird and petty things - but this time I completely agree with them. I think this is a very good law and one that every state and every country should enact. It not only protects the consumer getting a pet, but (more importantly) it protects the animals themselves. Puppy mills are awful places that need to be shut down immediately. Currently many places have an abundance of unwanted cats, dogs, rabbits, etc. and because of that many are abused and or put-down. I have always gotten a recused dog and find them to be some of the most loyal and wonderful of any dogs. I can understand people saying that a law that only requires selling a rescued animal will eventually cause a shortage of animals to buy and that will most likely happen (eventually) but that just means pet stores will have to bring in rescued animals from other locations thus helping and saving even more animals. My current dog (whom I got from a Humane Society 1 year ago) isn't from my state, but was rescued thousands upon thousands of miles away in the South and brought to my state because there were too many dogs in that state and too few in my state. That was a problem for both states and one that was fixed to help both states, the people in both states and the recused animals. ^

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46717173