From Military.com:
“Army Requests Massive Funding
Boost to Improve Barracks Amid Growing Quality-of-Life Concerns”
The Army is eyeing a massive
increase in its funding to maintain aging barracks and build new base housing
for junior troops in one of its most dramatic single budget requests to
Congress in recent years. In its proposed budget, the Army is seeking a
total of $2.35 billion for barracks in 2025, a major boost from this fiscal
year's $1.5 billion budget request. The Army’s proposed boost, which
includes tripling its budget to construct new barracks, signals the service has
taken enormous steps in elevating living conditions as a priority, siphoning
funds from other parts of the service.
The service’s overall budget
request is $185.9 billion -- a 0.2% increase from this year -- that when
adjusted for inflation, has the Army potentially operating in 2025 with
effectively the same budget. However, the final figures could change as
Congress takes the request and starts working out its own version of the Army
budget. That potential boost would fulfill what service leaders have long
called a top priority and will likely be among the heaviest lifts in the
proposed budget for the Army, which needs Congress to back and approve the
added money. It signals that Army planners are finally trying to wrap their
arms around the growing quality-of-life issues and poor housing conditions
faced by junior troops.
If successful, the major increase
in funding for barracks improvements could also be among the most meaningful
accomplishments in Army Secretary Christine Wormuth's tenure, who, in an
October interview with Military.com, said that the service needs a "generational"
investment in barracks. “Despite an overall flat Army budget and many competing
resource requirements, we are significantly increasing funding for barracks
construction, restoration, and modernization,” Wormuth said in a statement to
Military.com. “We will continue to work with Congress to make barracks a
long-term investment priority, as the Army still faces a significant
maintenance backlog in our large inventory of aging barracks.” The ambitious
request also puts the ball in Congress' court after lawmakers have started to
signal that the service should make bigger cash requests to repair dilapidated
barracks and replace its aging infrastructure, some of which is a half-century
old.
A divided Congress has usually
failed to pass a defense budget on time -- before the start of the fiscal year
in October -- in recent years. Instead, it has usually relied on stopgap
spending bills to avoid government shutdowns that buy Capitol Hill time to
negotiate. That patchwork funding makes it difficult for the Army to plan major
construction efforts, officials have warned. Congress has yet to pass the
Army’s fiscal 2024 funding, which has had a significant impact on the service’s
barracks efforts for this year. At least five construction efforts worth $237
million have been stalled, one Army official told Military.com. Installations
with stalled projects include Fort Liberty, North Carolina; Joint Base
Lewis-McChord, Washington; and Natick Soldier Systems Center, Massachusetts.
The Army’s proposed 2025 budget
also includes fully funding sustainment, at $680 million, which is part of the
larger $2.35 billion proposed barracks budget. In past years, roughly 15% of
the budget has been siphoned off to other priorities. That sustainment request,
which effectively funds barracks maintenance, is also an increase from this
year's $567 million. The Army conducted a servicewide inspection of all its
6,700 barracks buildings last year following a series of reports from
Military.com on poor living conditions.
It found 23% of them in
"poor" or "failing" condition. About 5% of the housing in
poor or failing condition was temporary barracks set up at locations such as
schools or major training centers, which are lower in priority compared to soldiers'
homes. For decades, the Army has struggled with its aging infrastructure --
much of it consisting of barracks infected with mold and pests or otherwise
unsafe or falling apart. The issue in some cases has gotten so bad that
soldiers have reported being hospitalized or sick with symptoms consistent with
long-term exposure to black mold.
Meanwhile, the service is
considering privatizing its barracks, with a pilot plan in the early stages at
Fort Irwin, California. Army planners aim to meet with key contractors
throughout the spring to see what expanding privatization would look like. In some
scenarios, that could mean contractors taking over existing barracks instead of
outright building new ones.
But for now, the Army is
eyeing a major list of new construction projects, all of which house between
100 and 220 soldiers. They include:
A $117 million barracks project
at Fort Johnson, Louisiana
$180 million for Old Guard
soldiers at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall, Virginia
A $161 million project at Joint
Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state
A $39 million project at Fort
Buchanan, Puerto Rico
$42 million for new training
barracks at Camp Parks, California
$144 million for Advanced
Individual Training, or AIT, barracks at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri
$191 million for two Army
Garrison Ansbach barracks projects in Germany
$61 million for Smith Barracks at
Army Garrison Rheinland-Pfalz in Germany.
^ This funding needs to be passed
by Congress immediately so the Army can make the desperately needed improvements.
^
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.