Base Cuts

From the Stars and Stripes:
"Army announces details of troop cuts, says they could expand"

 

Fort Benning, Fort Hood and Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson are the hardest hit  posts in the Army’s plan to significantly cut its force, losing more than 9,000 jobs between them. On Thursday, the Army released more details about its plans to eliminate 40,000 active-duty military positions, leaving a force of about 450,000. About 17,000 civilian jobs will also be cut. While some reductions will be through attrition, soldiers and civilians will lose their jobs, Army Director of Force Management Brig. Gen. Randy George said during a press briefing at the Pentagon. “These are incredibly difficult choices,” he said. The cuts are due to the Budget Control Act of 2011, which aimed to reduce defense spending. If there is another round of automatic budget cuts, known as sequestration, the Army would be forced to reduce their ranks by an additional 30,000 soldiers. The Army must give 90 days’ notice to Congress about any bases facing cuts of more than 1,000, and there is the possibility that Congress would make changes to the plan. Georgia will be the second-most affected state, behind Texas, with 4,349 soldiers cut from Fort Benning and Fort Stewart. “I am demanding answers from the Department of Defense on how they are justifying these troop cuts in Georgia,” Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Georgia, said in a statement after learning of the planned reductions. “We cannot afford to reduce our military readiness at a time when the threats to our security here at home and throughout the world are growing at an alarming rate.” Fort Benning’s losses were due in large part to an Army decision to convert the 3rd Brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division to a smaller battalion task force. The Army also plans to restructure the 4th Brigade of the 25th Infantry Division at Elmendorf-Richardson into a battalion task force. “Along with thousands of Alaskans, I find this decision devastating, far beyond what it means to our state economy but what it also means to America’s defense,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said in a statement. She said the cuts in her state jeopardize “our military capability and stretch in the Pacific at a time when we don’t want to weaken our strength in that region.” Critics agree that the cuts would leave America unable to respond appropriately to international threats. “Any conceivable strategic rationale for this cut to Army end-strength has been overturned by the events of the last few years from the rise of ISIL, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Ebola crisis, and more,” Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, said in a released statement.

 

Army cuts by bases

The list of bases — alphabetical by state — with troop reductions and the percentage of current personnel levels.
Source: Department of Defense

Alaska
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson: 2,631, (59 percent)
Fort Wainwright: 73, (1 percent)
Arizona
Fort Huachuca: 114, (5 percent)
Alabama
Fort Rucker: 186, (6 percent)
California
Fort Irwin: 246, (6 percent)
Colorado
Fort Carson: 365, (2 percent)
Georgia
Fort Benning: 3,402, (29 percent reduction)
Fort Stewart: 947, (5 percent)
Hawaii
Schofield Barracks: 1,214, (8 percent)
Fort Shafter: 229, (10 percent)
Kansas
Fort Riley: 615, (4 percent)
Fort Leavenworth: 60, (2 percent)
Kentucky
Fort Campbell: 353, (1 percent)
Louisiana
Fort Polk: 388, (5 percent)
Maryland
Aberdeen Proving Ground: 126, (5 percent)
Missouri
Fort Leonard Wood: 774, (15 percent)
New York
Fort Drum: 28, (0.2 percent)
North Carolina
Fort Bragg: 842, (2 percent)
South Carolina
Fort Jackson: 180, (6 percent)
Texas
Fort Bliss: 1,219, (5 percent)
Fort Hood: 3,350, (9 percent)
Joint Base San Antonio: 329, (6 percent)
Virginia
Fort Belvoir: 250, (6 percent)
Joint Base Langley-Eustis: 94, (2 percent)
Fort Lee: 127, (4 percent)
Washington
Joint Base Lewis-McChord: 1,251, (5 percent)

Bases that are adding soldiers:

Fort Gordon (Georgia): 41, (1 percent)
Fort Knox (Kentucky): 67, (1 percent)
Fort Meade (Maryland): 99, (2 percent)
Fort Sill (Oklahoma): 219, (3 percent)

 

^ This makes absolutely no sense. You can not reduce the number of soldiers you have and still expect to protect not only the country, but also the world. Whomever thought you could (ie Democrats) need a reality check. We are still in Afghanistan going after the Taliban. We are in eastern Europe as a show of force against Russia. We are in Iraq fighting ISIL (and also bombing their targets in Syria.) We are in eastern Africa to stop the pirates. We are in Asia and Australia as a show of force against China. We are in South Korea to protect them against North Korea. We are already stretched very thin and it is beyond stupid to even consider cutting our military. In a perfect world we could, but in reality we can not. ^

http://www.stripes.com/news/us/army-announces-details-of-troop-cuts-says-they-could-expand-1.357179