From the BBC:
"US rebuff to gay marriage opponents"
^ 30 states out of 50 isn't bad (along with DC, but excluding US territories like Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, Guam, Northern Marianas and American Samoa.) It does seem a little tiring and wasteful to appeal each state's ban on gay marriage. The Supreme Court should just make one statement like it did ending black segregation in the 1950s. ^
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29508566
"US rebuff to gay marriage opponents"
The US Supreme Court has rejected appeals against gay marriage in five states - Indiana, Utah, Oklahoma, Virginia and Wisconsin. The move increases the number of states where same-sex marriage is legal to 30, plus the District of Columbia. By rejecting the appeals, the court left intact lower-court rulings that had struck down bans in those states. Support for gay marriage in the US has gained momentum since the Supreme Court delivered two landmark rulings in 2013. Monday's ruling means that the nine justices of the court have stopped short from resolving the question of same-sex marriage nationwide. But it was received rapturously by gay marriage campaigners. "Today is a joyous day for thousands of couples across America who will immediately feel the impact of today's Supreme Court action," said Chad Griffin, president of Human Rights Campaign. But he urged the court to tackle "a complex and discriminatory patchwork of marriage laws" that remain in place. "The only acceptable solution is nationwide marriage equality and we recommit to ourselves to securing that ultimate victory as soon as possible," he said. "Supreme Court declining these cases is a victory for gay marriage, but also for letting states do the lifting. Seems about right to me." - tweeted Jason Kuznicki of the Cato Institute. Same-sex couples in the five states named in the ruling can get married now, because marriages there had been on hold. Couples in six other states - Colorado, Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia and Wyoming - will be able to get married soon. Last year, the Supreme Court struck down a federal law that denied benefits to legally married same sex partners. That led to several victories across the US as gay-marriage bans were struck down in lower courts. Many expected the Supreme Court to use this session to, at some point, tackle the issue nationwide, rather than address it state-by-state.
^ 30 states out of 50 isn't bad (along with DC, but excluding US territories like Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, Guam, Northern Marianas and American Samoa.) It does seem a little tiring and wasteful to appeal each state's ban on gay marriage. The Supreme Court should just make one statement like it did ending black segregation in the 1950s. ^
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29508566
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.