From Yahoo Canada:
"Foreign ministers downplay shared Canada-U.K. embassies"
Foreign ministers for Canada and the U.K. downplayed an agreement to share space in embassies around the world, amid criticism from opposition MPs in Ottawa on Monday. Britain's Foreign Secretary William Hague was in Ottawa to announce an agreement between the two countries that Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird says will start with embassies in Haiti and Burma, and will allow civil servants to consider doing so in more countries as the need arises. "We are not moving to merge all of our embassies and consulates around the world. We are not going to be sharing ambassadors or trade commissioners," Baird said. "Each country will continue to have complete independence on policy and Canadian public servants will always protect and promote Canada's interests and Canada's values. In select locations, this simply allows Canadian diplomats to do their good work faster and at a lower cost to Canadian taxpayers." Hague said the two countries were expanding on an agreement announced last fall when British Prime Minister David Cameron was in Ottawa. "We are two countries with large diplomatic networks ... but we can't be everywhere," Hague said. "This looks to increase our co-operation to maximize our reach and impact on how two vibrant foreign ministries with common goals in many respects can work together — common values, shared values ... It is about speed and flexibility, practicality, saving the taxpayer money in both countries." Hague said the agreement doesn't change the two countries' independence from each other. NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar said it was confusing that the government argued the plan was an innovative approach to foreign affairs and announced it with much fanfare, but then said it's more about sharing administrative services. The arrangement, he (Baird) said, will allow a British diplomat to have an office at the Canadian Embassy in Haiti, where Britain now has no presence. At the same time, Canada can send a foreign service officer to Burma to work out of the British Embassy until the Canadian mission is established. Those are the only two countries included so far in the agreement.
NDP Leader Tom Mulcair accused the government of being unable to represent Canada abroad. "If the Conservatives won't stand up for Canada in the world, why do they expect that the British will do it for us?" he said. "It's all very nice to be nostalgic for the great British empire, but there are limits."
Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae criticized Prime Minister Stephen Harper for avoiding the UN General Assembly this week. "If we have such a wonderful independent foreign policy, why isn't the prime minister of Canada discussing that foreign policy in front of the United Nations this week like so many heads of state?" he said. The NDP also raised the issue of French-language services and whether they would be available to francophones through the British missions. The British press broke the news yesterday that Canada and the U.K. would be announcing they will co-ordinate some embassies to share administrative costs. "The U.K. and Canada have signed an agreement on closer working that will provide a framework for our missions overseas to co-operate more closely, sharing admin costs for example, where appropriate to promote U.K. and Canadian interests. This declaration sets out a number of areas to further co-operation, including co-location, crisis response, security and consular co-operation," the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office said in a statement to CBC News. "This is part of the government’s drive to deepen our relationships and improve our engagement with a number of Commonwealth allies across the full spectrum of foreign policy issues." There is speculation in the U.K. that the agreement is meant to compete with efforts by the EU to co-ordinate its own diplomatic work. Hague denied that. "Obviously we work very closely with other European foreign services ... and there are places where we sometimes share a compound with some of the other foreign ministries of the European Union," he said. This won't be Canada's first foray into sharing services. Canada and Australia have worked together in 26 locations around the world for years.
^ I think it makes sense for Canada and the UK to share embassies in certain countries (such as Haiti and Burma) as long as they only do what they say here: where a Canadian foreign officer will make all the decisions for a Canadian citizen overseas or a foreigner wishing to go to Canada and a British foreign officer will do the same for a British citizen overseas or a foreigner wishing to go to the UK. If that is the case then there shouldn't be an issue with French-language services since all Federal government employers - including those working at embassies - have to know both English and French. I am now curious to know the details of the Australian-Canadian agreement (and think it should be the same as the UK one.) ^
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/foreign-ministers-downplay-shared-canada-u-k-embassies-001603209.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.