From the BBC:
“Scot Peterson not guilty over Parkland school shooting
response”
A former sheriff's deputy has been found not guilty of
failing to protect students when a gunman opened fire at a Florida high school
in 2018. Scot Peterson stayed outside during the attack at Marjory Stoneman
Douglas High School in Parkland, near Miami. Mr Peterson, the school's resource
officer, was found not guilty of 11 charges including felony child neglect,
culpable negligence and perjury. The attack, among the deadliest at a US
school, saw 17 killed and 17 injured. Mr Peterson, 60, put his head in his
hands and began sobbing as the verdicts were read out in court in Fort
Lauderdale. After the verdict, Mr Peterson told reporters that he would like to
talk to the parents of the students who were killed. "If they need to
really know the truth of what occurred... I'll be there for them," he
said.
But Tony Montalto, whose daughter Gina was one of the
students murdered, said he continued to blame Mr Peterson for not trying to
stop the shooting. "His inaction contributed to the shock, the devastation
of students and teachers at that school," Mr Montalto told reporters.
"We don't understand how this jury looked at the evidence that was
presented and found him not guilty." "All I can say to the members of
the jury is: 'I think your school should hire him to protect your
children,'" he said.
The jury heard testimony that when the attack occurred on 14
February 2018, Mr Peterson, who was armed but was not wearing body armour,
stayed in an alcove adjacent to the school building for 30 or 40 minutes until
the shooting stopped. A Florida Department of Law Enforcement investigation
found he "did absolutely nothing to mitigate" the shooting. Critics, including
then-President Donald Trump, branded him a coward. Mr Peterson is believed to
be the first US officer charged with failing to respond to a school shooting,
according to the National Association of School Resource Officers. He could
have faced a sentence of up to 97 years in prison if he had been convicted. There
is no law that requires a police officer to put themselves in the line of fire,
or risk their lives during a shooting, so prosecutors chose to charge him with
felony child negligence. The case hinged on whether Mr Peterson had a legal
obligation to try to stop the killer. But the defence focused on Mr Peterson's
long career, said that he was confused about the where the shots were coming
from, and argued that he could not be considered a "caregiver" under
a law typically used to prosecute parents or day care providers when children
are hurt while under their care.
In a statement, the Broward County State Attorney's Office
repeated its contention that Mr Peterson could have done more to save the
victims. "For the first time in our nation's history, prosecutors in this
case have tried to hold an armed school resource officer responsible for not
doing his job," the attorney's office said. "As parents, we have an
expectation that armed school resource officers - who are under contract to be
caregivers to our children - will do their jobs when we entrust our children to
them and the schools they guard." But Bob Jarvis, a law professor at Nova
Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale, said it was a
"ridiculous" to attempt to legally designate Mr Peterson a caregiver
for hundreds of students. Mr Jarvis said the case had the potential to set
precedent for whether law enforcement - or even civilian school officials -
will face prosecution for failing to confront a gunman. "The government's
case always was a long shot at best, and clearly the jury saw that Peterson was
merely a scapegoat," Mr Jarvis said. "This will make it very unlikely
for other prosecutors to bring such a case" in the future, he said. Gunman
Nikolas Cruz, a former student at the school, was sentenced in November to life
in prison without the possibility of parole for the Parkland attack. Mr
Peterson's trial came after police officers in Uvalde, Texas also faced
criticism for failing to confront a killer. A report by the Texas Department of
Public Safety found a Uvalde police officer could have stopped the attack on
Robb Elementary School by shooting the killer before he entered, but hesitated
while awaiting permission from a supervisor. More than an hour later, a team of
US border patrol agents stormed the school, by which time the gunman had killed
19 children and two teachers and injured 17 others.
^ Every single member of that Jury should be ashamed of
themselves. They have set a horrible precedent that it is right for a School
Resource Officer, a Policeman/woman, a Security Guard, etc. to not do the 1
thing they are supposed to (and are trained and paid to do) stop violence.
I agree with Mr. Montalto: these Jurors should hire Petersen
(and people like him) at their Children’s Schools and in all the other places
they work, shop, go. Then if someone starts a mass shooting and the 1 person
who is supposed to protect them flees they only have themselves to blame for
the carnage.
It doesn’t really surprise me that this happened down in
Florida. ^
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.