From the BBC:
"Royal baby: The American mistake"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-23423784
"Royal baby: The American mistake"
Some US television networks proclaimed the royal baby news
by welcoming the arrival of the "future king of England", forgetting about the
rest of the UK. Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish... you may want to look away now. Some of the
biggest names in American broadcasting have overlooked your existence amid the
hysteria surrounding the newborn Windsor. Star presenters on CBS News and ABC
News were among the culprits who referred to the baby as "the future king of
England". American talk show host Ellen DeGeneres tweeted: "It's a boy! So happy
for my cousin Kate and the future King of England". But there hasn't been a King of England since William III in the early 18th
Century - and there won't be again, unless (or until) the United Kingdom
splinters completely.
It's a common misunderstanding in the US. The New York
Times angered many Scots when it marked Andy Murray's Wimbledon triumph with a
tweet that said: "After 77 years, Murray and England rule" But before Brits get too sniffy about this equation between Britain and
England, we should acknowledge it's a pretty complicated business and the
English are sometimes guilty of the same mistake. A common error is for the
British themselves to forget about Northern Ireland by referring to "Great
Britain", which is an island, when really they mean the United Kingdom. (The
Northern Irish are "British" without being part of Great Britain.) And remember that the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are British, but
not part of the UK. Head hurting yet? This is a two-way street, and getting to grips with the correct terminology
stateside is also a tricky business. The United States of America is often
referred to as "America" by British people, but consult the Oxford English
Dictionary and you'll see that America is a desire, a place you yearn for. Of
course, Simon and Garfunkel fans knew that already. The distinction between America and the US is important, because there is
another America, Latin America. Not to mention Central America, and the rest of
North America (including Mexico and Canada). So can we legitimately use "American" as an adjective referring to something
from the US? If so, you're back in the Britain/British quagmire again. Perhaps
the answer is for everyone to be tolerant, to embrace a bit of "constructive
ambiguity"... and just toast the health of the future king.
^ This was an interesting article. It seems that lots of nationalities - not just Americans - have this problem. When I was in school our textbooks always said "Russia or Russians" when they meant "Soviets or the USSR." Out books also said "English" when they meant "British." If we teach our kids the wrong terms it is not surprising that they use the wrong names when they are older. ^
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-23423784
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.