Thursday, February 28, 2019

Purple Hearts First

From Military.com:
"Purple Heart Recipients Will Move to Front of Line for VA Claims, Wilkie Says "

Purple Heart recipients will soon take priority in the queue for Department of Veterans Affairs claims adjudication, VA Secretary Robert Wilkie announced Tuesday. In a hearing before the House Appropriations Military Construction, Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Subcommittee, Wilkie said veterans who have earned the Purple Heart will be placed "at the front of the line when it comes to claims before the department." According to Wilkie, the change is in "recognition of wounds taken in battle." He didn't provide details on how the change will be implemented but said it is among the many improvements the department is making as part of the claims and appeals modernization effort. The VA launched a new process for handling compensation claims appeals Feb. 19, with a goal of reducing the wait time for a final decision from three to seven years to roughly four months. The new process, created under the Appeals Modernization Act, gives veterans three choices for appealing their claim, including providing new evidence to the original reviewer; having a more senior adjudicator review the decision; and appealing to the Board of Veterans Appeals. Wilkie described the change as part of a 21st-century transformation at the department. The VA appeals backlog, which will be handled by the legacy system of appealing decisions to the board, stands at roughly 402,000 cases. The new system will not only be used for disability compensation claims decisions, it will tackle decisions on education and insurance applications, vocational rehabilitation, caregiver benefits and claims with the National Cemetery Administration, according to the VA.

^ I really hope this new VA system will work and that it will help the veterans (whether they received a Purple Heart or not.) The men and women who served our country deserve only the best and so far we as a country have let them all down. ^

Phil Lied


^ I think the Russians hacked Phil and made him say Spring was coming early. ^

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Hat Deportation

From USA Today:
"Woman who knocked off man's MAGA hat now faces deportation"

A woman who was arrested earlier this month at a Mexican restaurant in Massachusetts for an alleged assault in which she knocked off a man's "Make America Great Again" hat is now facing deportation proceedings.  Rosiane Santos was arrested in Falmouth, Massachusetts, on Feb. 15 and charged with disorderly conduct, assault and battery for the hat-related disturbance with Bryton Turner, who captured the incident on video.   The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, known as ICE, has since accused Santos of being an unlawfully present citizen of Brazil residing near Falmouth. On Tuesday, Santos was arrested by deportation officers with ICE's Fugitive Operations Team, according to ICE spokesman John Mohan. After entering into removal proceedings in federal immigrant court, Santos was released from ICE custody, Mohan said in a statement. She now awaits a future court date. The confrontation occurred at Casa Vallarta Mexican Restaurant in Falmouth, a town of 31,000 that is 75 miles southeast of Boston. In the video-recorded portion of the encounter, Santos, 41, approaches Turner, 23, from behind while he  is sitting down at the restaurant.   Santos is seen knocking off his red MAGA hat, a trademark hat of President Donald Trump, making hand gestures at the camera and shouting at Turner, who is from Mashpee, Massachusetts.   "You see this right here?" Turner says in the video. "This is the problem: ignorant people like this. I'm just trying to sit here and have a nice meal. After he puts the hat back on, Santos quickly returns and pulls the hat down over his eyes while pushing his head down toward the bar. "You see this? You see this?" Turner continues.  He spoke calmly but kept calling her names. "People like that, that's the problem. That's the problem with America these days. People are just ignorant. They want to lash out on people who are educated." By this point, Falmouth police had already been dispatched to the restaurant in response to a disturbance. The officers observed the incident and found Santos to be heavily intoxicated with bloodshot eyes, unsteady feet, slurred speech and a strong odor of alcohol. According to a police incident report, Santos told police that Turner  "shouldn't be allowed in a Mexican restaurant with that hat." It took multiple officers to restrain Santos after she resisted an officer's initial attempt to handcuff her, the report says. She was then escorted outside.  "She continued to raise her voice and yell profanities," one of the police officer's said in the account.  During the booking process, the police report says, she yelled profanities and at one point gave the middle finger to an officer.  Santos told Boston 25 News that while she regrets her actions, she was provoked by Turner.   “I had a little bit to drink maybe that’s the reason that I couldn’t walk away but being discriminated for so many times in my life, I just had to stand up for myself," she told the television station. "He’s not a victim. I am the victim. I have been bullied, OK?” Turner told Howie Carr, a conservative columnist at the Boston Herald, that he was sitting at the restaurant's bar with friends when Santos began asking him why he was wearing the MAGA hat.   He said she knocked off his hat three or four times before he took video with his phone.   “I said, ‘It’s America. I can wear this hat wherever I want,'" Turner said, later saying that he believes he was the victim of a hate crime.  “ I was minding my own business and she threw a fit over my beliefs, so I guess by definition, yeah, I am (a victim of a hate crime).”

^ I am sick and tired of people from all sides taking mob-justice out on other people. That goes for those anti-Trump supporters who attack (verbally or physically) pro-Trump supporters and for pro-Trump supporters who attack (verbally or physically) anti-Trump supporters. Santos was in the wrong here the same way you see on different cell phone videos where bigots are shouting for people to "Speak English" or to "Go Back to Your Homeland" are wrong. Two wrongs do not make a right. Santos assaulted a man for his beliefs and now has the threat of deportation against her. If she is in the US illegally then she should be deported because ALL illegal immigrants are criminals (the became criminals when they committed the crime of illegally entering or illegally over-staying their visa.) The ultra-liberals and the ultra-conservatives both breach nothing but hate and violence against anyone who doesn't believe in the same things they do nowadays and that is what is really wrong with this country. Being too liberal is not a good thing the same way being too conservative is not a good thing. I am liberal on some issues and conservatives on other issues - a moderate some would call me. Even if I disagree with you I wouldn't go up and attack you the way the ultra-liberals and the ultra-conservatives currently do. Too much of one thing is not good. You need a balance. The country definitely needs a balance right now. We also need the haters and bigots on both sides to stop calling for mob-justice violence. ^

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/02/27/massachusetts-woman-who-knocked-off-mans-maga-hat-faces-deportation/3002085002/

I'd Like A Coke


Gulf War Memorial

From Military.com:
"National Memorial to Gulf War Veterans Moves Forward with Site Dedication"

The dedication of a first-of-its kind national memorial to veterans of the First Gulf War Tuesday in Washington, D.C. drew dignitaries including former Vice President Dick Cheney, who oversaw Operations Desert Storm and Desert Shield in his role as defense secretary. In his remarks at the ceremony, Cheney, 78, said the site on the National Mall, off Constitution Avenue and by the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, is a fitting tribute to veterans of the war, who were "welcomed home with the gratitude and respect they earned," in contrast to Vietnam veterans Veterans of the first Gulf War who spoke at the ceremony also said that the lessons of Vietnam were on their minds as Operation Desert Shield began in early August 1990 to protect Saudi Arabia from Iraqi invasion and begin the assembly of a coalition force of more than 600,000 for the liberation of Kuwait. Operation Desert Storm began in January 1991 with ferocious air and naval bombardments that lasted five weeks and cleared the way for the ground campaign that drove the Iraqis from Kuwait in 100 hours, culminating in a cease-fire on Feb. 28, 1991. "The dire predictions of thousands of casualties never came to pass, with the ensuing rapid and resounding victory putting to rest the doubts about our all-volunteer force," Scott Stump, a Marine veteran of Desert Storm/Desert Shield and president of the National Desert Storm War Memorial Association, said. The Pentagon lists 383 U.S. troops as having been killed in action in Desert Shield/Desert Storm. Stump said the concept for a memorial on or near the National Mall began to take shape in 2010. President Barack Obama authorized construction in 2014; President Donald Trump approved construction near the Mall in 2017. One of the sites originally suggested was along the Potomac River, but the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, the National Capital Planning Commission and the National Park Service in June 2018 finally approved the site off Constitution Avenue, just across 23rd Street NW from the Vietnam Veterans Memorial and down the rise to the Lincoln Memorial. No date has been set for a groundbreaking ceremony, but Stump said the grand opening for the memorial is planned for Veterans Day 2021. The task now is to raise the estimated $40 million for construction of the memorial. The association has about $8 million already donated, he said. In his remarks at the dedication ceremony, retired Air Force Gen. Chuck Horner, a Vietnam veteran and architect of the Desert Storm air campaign, several times gestured over his shoulder to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial to make his point that Vietnam and Desert Storm were "inextricably linked" in the different ways they were fought. The senior leadership in Desert Storm "gave the military a mission" and "didn't impose rules of engagement on us. So we were blessed" and able "to avoid the stupidness that led to that disaster over there," he said, gesturing again to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. "We fought it with our hands untied," Horner said, adding he was "glad we had the leadership that decided victory was the answer and allowed us to do it." Cheney, who became a lightning rod for critics of the 2003 Iraq invasion and occupation when he served as vice president, said the conflict that liberated Kuwait in 1991 restored the nation's pride and confidence in its military, which had been shaken by Vietnam and its aftermath. Based on the "crucial lessons learned in Southeast Asia," he said that he and then-President George H.W. Bush prepared for swift victory and had an exit strategy in mind in rallying a coalition to repel the invasion of Kuwait by Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. "For all the risk involved," the mission was vital, Cheney said. "We had to show him that the world doesn't work that way anymore, and we did." Cheney said that he and his wife, Lynne, visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial on Jan. 16, 1991, the night before the air campaign in Desert Storm began, to sense the responsibility that the senior leadership was about to undertake from the more than 58,000 names of the fallen listed on the memorial's iconic Wall "We knew, of course, that some of them would not return," he said of those who would go into battle in Desert Storm. "We wanted to make sure we got it right this time." Other Desert Storm veterans who attended the ceremony had their own takes on the lessons learned from Vietnam. Wayne Gunther, 54, of Strum, Wisconsin, who retired as a warrant officer but was a sergeant with Golf Co., 2nd Battalion, Third Marines, during Desert Storm, said of Vietnam veterans that "those were the guys that taught us" how to fight. Gunther said he was assigned to clear paths through the Iraqi minefields for tanks and mechanized infantry and eventually reached Kuwait City in the offensive. "It was staggering, it was so quick," he said. He had heard all the scuttlebutt that "it was gonna be awful, we were gonna go through a meat grinder." He said it probably "would have been a slugfest without the air campaign," but "it never came to that ugliness." Former Air Force Master Sgt. Jim Ayres, who serviced refueling tankers with the 1709 Provisional Air Wing, said it was "the greatest honor ever" to have the Desert Shield/Desert Storm Memorial in proximity to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, the Korean War Veterans Memorial and the World War II Memorial. Retired Army Lt. Col. Kyle Leggs, 54, of Baltimore, a board member of the National Desert Storm War Memorial Association, served with the 200th Movement Control Team. "It was intense to be in a war not knowing what to expect," he said, including the possible use by the Iraqis of chemical and biological weapons. He was in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, when it was hit by an Iraqi Scud missile that killed 28 U.S. troops. He said the memorial is partly "about those who didn't come home." However, Leggs echoed other board members in stating that the memorial, when it is complete, "should not be about mourning," but more of a place "to appreciate a U.S.-led victory" that was a "turning point in our military history."

^ It's important that we have a National Memorial to the Gulf War (and for every War that the US has fought in and where Americans have died in.) ^

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/02/26/national-memorial-gulf-war-veterans-moves-forward-site-dedication.html

Methodist Reject

From USA Today:
"United Methodist delegates reject plan allowing same-sex marriage, LGBT clergy"

United Methodists on Tuesday rejected an effort by more progressive members of the global church to lift the denomination's ban on same-sex marriage and LGBT clergy. During the special session of the church's General Conference in St. Louis, delegates voted not to substitute the more inclusive One Church Plan for the conservative Traditional Plan, which reinforces the denomination's current prohibitions. The swap failed by 75 votes, 374 to 449. Later Tuesday, delegates in a 438-384 vote approved the Traditional Plan as some opposed to it disrupted the meeting in protest. The Rev. Tom Berlin, a delegate from the Virginia Conference, spoke from the General Conference stage in support of the One Church Plan, which would have allowed same-sex marriage and LGBT clergy while adding protections for churches and pastors who do not support the marriages. "What’s being said in private conversations is that if the Traditional Plan, the majority plan, is voted in today, you will be putting a virus into the American church and it will make it very sick and it will be sick quickly," Berlin said.

Urging support for One Church Plan
The push for substitution was delivered via a minority report. It is a General Conference mechanism that supporters of the One Church Plan decided to use after the plan failed to make it out of legislative committee on Tuesday. Berlin said passing the Traditional Plan sends a hurtful message to LGBT people in the church and their allies. He said he had already heard from some people who said they would be leaving the church if the Traditional Plan passes. "Whether you like it or not, they feel that their church is exhibiting itself as being against gay people along with others," Berlin said. “It’s not your intention I know, but it’s what they experience and that matters." Nancy Denardo, a delegate from the Western Pennsylvania Conference, spoke against the One Church Plan substitution and cited parts of the Bible as support for her reasoning.  "The One Church Plan does not agree with the words of our savior and in so doing deceives young persons into believing that same-gender marriage is OK with God when clearly it is not," Denardo said. "There is danger to that not only to those being deceived but the deceivers as well." 

Methodists divided over LGBT issues
Before the top policy-making body of the denomination voted down the One Church Plan, the delegates, bishops and others on the floor of the special session joined together in prayer.  The United Methodist Church remains deeply divided over the denomination's ban on same-sex marriage and LGBT clergy. This week's big meeting in St. Louis put that on full display and the outcome threatens to split the global church of more than 12 million members. United Methodists have disagreed over their church's position that homosexuality is "incompatible with Christian teaching" and other LGBT matters for nearly 50 years. They continue to do so today. The 864 lay and clergy delegates from around the world are voting Tuesday on how the church should move ahead. The legislative committee on Monday advanced the Traditional Plan. But parts of the Traditional Plan were ruled unconstitutional under church rules Tuesday by the denomination's Judicial Council. It remains to be seen how those rulings will impact the delegate's work on Tuesday. 

^ It is sad when any religion continues to discriminate against homosexuals. A religion that preaches love and not hate should practice what they preach.  ^

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/02/26/united-methodist-church-general-conference-same-sex-marriage-lgbt-clergy-division-splitting/2996063002/

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Branches Response

From Military.com:
"Here's How Each Service Is Tackling Poor Military Base Housing Conditions"

Each of the military services this week has announced plans conduct inspections of base housing and interviews with families to discover how badly service members have been impacted by unhealthy living conditions. In the wake of recent reports of neglected facilities and hazardous living conditions, as well as ongoing pressure from lawmakers to rectify the problem, the services issued directives on how they plan to address problems, including black mold, rodent and bug infestations, water damage, radon contamination and faulty wiring.

The Air Force last week ordered commanders at all its bases worldwide to conduct a "100 percent review of the condition and safety of all military housing by March 1," Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson and Chief of Staff Gen David Goldfein said in a joint statement. Wilson plans to visit MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, Wednesday to speak with affected families and housing management leadership about what more can be done to corner the dilemma, the Tampa Bay Times reported Monday. The service will conduct home walk-throughs and interviews with families at all 74,500 family housing units across the Air Force, officials said. In addition to an immediate Air Force Inspector General review on how the service has been responding to housing complaints, senior leaders at bases "will be responsible for identifying and helping resolve a host of problems in housing where airmen and their families live," according to a Feb. 19 release. Air Force officials told Military.com they would have to receive permission before entering any military family’s home.

The Navy will conduct home inspections and reach out to "100 [percent] of Sailors living in government and Public Private Venture (PPV) family housing" to understand whether families are satisfied, the service said Feb. 23. "Every Sailor residing in PPV or government housing will be afforded an opportunity for a visit from their command at their residence no later than April 15, 2019," Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson and Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy Russell Smith said in a release. The visits will be voluntary and by invitation only. "The purpose of these visits is to raise Navy awareness of family living conditions, to allow command leadership to personally observe any issues affecting the home and to understand any actions being taken to address them," officials said. The visits will serve as an opportunity to help sailors and their families resolve any outstanding housing issues, they said. Richardson and Smith said additional information on how sailors and spouses can reach out to report a problem will be published this week. "This is unacceptable and will be resolved," Richardson wrote on Twitter. "We are prioritizing efforts to better understand our Sailors' living conditions in on-base government family and PPV housing to ensure that as residents they are provided with the quality of life they have earned and deserve."

Echoing the CNO, Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Robert Neller said he "expects commanders to know how their Marines and Sailors are living and to advocate for them." "Because we care, we have an obligation to be personally involved in the lives and welfare of our Marines and their families," Neller wrote Feb. 22 on Twitter. The Marine Corps issued a "white letter" to commanders and senior enlisted leaders to conduct voluntary home visits to all who reside in government quarters, privatized military housing or off-base civilian rental property by April 15, the service said in a statement. Command teams will visit only those members "who accept the command's offer of assistance" but will still "provide information on how to address housing concerns," the statement said. Officials could bring about more effective changes by holding government housing contractors in check, some Pentagon leaders said.

Last week, Army Secretary Mark Esper, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley and Sergeant Major of the Army Dan Dailey met with the heads of seven contracting companies following a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on how Defense Department leaders plan to solve the widespread problems. Esper, Milley and Dailey traveled to Fort Meade, Maryland, earlier this month to conduct their own inspection of the privately managed housing on the installation, where they observed what they described as "unacceptable ... deficient housing conditions." Dailey traveled to Fort Belvoir, Virginia, last week while Army Under Secretary Ryan McCarthy conducted similar tours at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, and Fort Eustis, Virginia, the Army announced Monday. "We will stop at nothing to make sure that we are doing the right thing by our Soldiers," McCarthy said in a statement. "It shouldn't take us going to stand in someone's kitchen to understand the extent of the problem." Companies that met with the service include Balfour Beatty Communities, CRC Companies LLC, Corvias Military Living, Hunt Military Communities, Lincoln Military Housing, Lendlease Corp. and Michael's Military Housing. The Army has also said it would step up inspections of all base housing and hold town halls across more than 40 installations for soldiers and families living in more than 87,000 homes, according to a service release.

 In addition to oversight of housing and improved communication with the companies, Esper, Milley and Dailey said they had agreed to a tenant bill of rights that would suspend certain fees and let soldiers withhold rent payments if their housing issues aren't solved. The Air Force and the Navy said they too support a tenant bill of rights that would provide troops with more protection with housing authorities, according to a Reuters interview. Issues over the safety of privately managed military housing were exposed last year in several months-long investigations by Reuters, titled "Ambushed at Home." They included reports of children poisoned by lead in older homes and families falling ill as the result of mold growth in new construction.

^ I really hope the different branches of the US Military are actually going to do what they say they will do to fix this horrendous housing issue. ^

CAIN Cuts

From the BBC:
"Troubles website 'CAIN' faces cuts"

The future of a valuable archive of Northern Ireland's Troubles run by Ulster University is in doubt amid funding concerns. Cain - Conflict Archive on the Internet - charts the history, key events and political issues concerning the Troubles, dating back to 1968. It is a "go-to" website for academics from across the world as well as an important resource for journalists. It is run from the university's Magee campus in Londonderry. On Monday, the university said it was consulting with trade unions and staff on the archive's future, and was exploring a range of options. The university said it was committed to ensuring ongoing access to the archive.  "A two-year period was agreed in 2016 to enable the Cain archive to improve its financial viability and become self-funding," said a spokesperson. "Despite some successful funding applications, regrettably these have not been enough and the project remains unsustainable in its current form." Goretti Horgan, a social policy lecturer at Ulster University, and a University and College Union representative (UCU), told BBC Radio Ulster's Evening Extra programme she was concerned at the development. She said UCU was concerned that some jobs were at stake, and "whether some of the core missions of the university, particularly in relation to being a civic university and a global one, are going to be very badly impacted if Cain is essentially mothballed". "I use Cain on a regular basis to find information about speeches that politicians make, or particular incidents that happened," Ms Horgan added. Cain... has a global reach." Cain is part of Ark - Access Research Knowledge - and is based within Incore - the International Conflict Research Institute. The university said it was consulting on a way forward and that the work of Ark and Incore would not be affected. It added that the Cain resource would "remain available online in its current state".  It said a range of options are being explored and the university "remains committed to ensuring ongoing access to the important material in CAIN, fully accessible to the public through the university's library".

^ I have used this site and found it really helpful and informative. I really hope they can receive the funding they need to keep going. ^

54th Massachusetts Infantry


The 54th Massachusetts Infantry



From the beginning of the Civil War, President Lincoln argued that the Union forces were not fighting to end slavery but to prevent the disintegration of the United States. For abolitionists, however, ending slavery was the reason for the war, and they argued that black people should be able to join the fight for their freedom. However, African Americans were not allowed to serve as soldiers in the Union Army until January 1, 1863. On that day, the Emancipation Proclamation decreed that “such persons [that is, African-American men] of suitable condition, will be received into the armed services of the United States.
The 54th Massachusetts 
Early in February 1863, the abolitionist Governor John A. Andrew of Massachusetts issued the Civil War’s first call for black soldiers. Massachusetts did not have many African-American residents, but by the time 54th Infantry regiment headed off to training camp two weeks later more than 1,000 men had volunteered. Many came from other states, such as New York, Indiana and Ohio; some even came from Canada. One-quarter of the volunteers came from slave states and the Caribbean. Fathers and sons (some as young as 16) enlisted together. The most famous enlistees were Charles and Lewis Douglass, two sons of the abolitionist Frederick Douglass. To lead the 54th Massachusetts, Governor Andrew chose a young white officer named Robert Gould Shaw. Shaw’s parents were wealthy and prominent abolitionist activists. Shaw himself had dropped out of Harvard to join the Union Army and had been injured in the Battle of Antietam. He was just 25 years old.
“So Full of Hope and Glory” 
At nine o’clock on the morning on May 28, 1863, the 54th’s 1,007 black soldiers and 37 white officers gathered in the Boston Common and prepared to head to the battlefields of the South. They did so in spite of an announcement by the Confederate Congress that every captured black soldier would be sold into slavery and every white officer in command of black troops would be executed. Cheering well-wishers, including the anti-slavery advocates William Lloyd Garrison, Wendell Phillips and Frederick Douglass, lined Boston’s streets. “I know not,” Governor Andrew said at the close of the parade, “where in all human history to any given thousand men in arms there has been committed a work at once so proud, so precious, so full of hope and glory as the work committed to you.” That evening, the 54th Infantry boarded a transport ship bound for Charleston.
Tragedy at Fort Wagner 
Colonel Shaw and his troops landed at Hilton Head on June 3. The next week, they were forced by Shaw’s superiors to participate in a particularly destructive raid on the town of Darien, Georgia. The colonel was furious: His troops had come South to fight for freedom and justice, he argued, not to destroy undefended towns with no military significance. He wrote to General George Strong and asked if the 54th might lead the next Union charge on the battlefield. Even as they fought to end slavery in the Confederacy, the African-American soldiers of the 54th were fighting against another injustice as well. The U.S. Army paid black soldiers $10 a week; white soldiers got $3 more. To protest against this insult, the entire regiment–soldiers and officers alike–refused to accept their wages until black and white soldiers earned equal pay for equal work. This did not happen until the war was almost over. On July 18, 1863, the 54th Massachusetts prepared to storm Fort Wagner, which guarded the Port of Charleston. At dusk, Shaw gathered 600 of his men on a narrow strip of sand just outside Wagner’s fortified walls and readied them for action. “I want you to prove yourselves,” he said. “The eyes of thousands will look on what you do tonight.” As night fell, Shaw led his men over the walls of the fort. (This was unusual; typically, officers followed their soldiers into battle.) Unfortunately, the Union generals had miscalculated: 1,700 Confederate soldiers waited inside the fort, ready for battle. The men of the 54th were outgunned and outnumbered. Two hundred and eighty one of the 600 charging soldiers were killed, wounded or captured. Shaw himself was shot in the chest on his way over the wall and died instantly. To show their contempt for the soldiers of the 54th, the Confederates dumped all of their bodies in a single unmarked trench and cabled Union leaders that “we have buried [Shaw] with his niggers.” The Southerners expected that this would be such an insult that white officers would no longer be willing to fight with black troops. In fact, the opposite was true: Shaw’s parents replied that there could be “no holier place” to be buried than “surrounded by…brave and devoted soldiers.” The 54th lost the battle at Fort Wagner, but they did a great deal of damage there. Confederate troops abandoned the fort soon afterward. For the next two years, the regiment participated in a series of successful siege operations in South Carolina, Georgia and Florida. The 54th Massachusetts returned to Boston in September 1865.
“The Pride, Courage and Devotion of the Patriot Soldier” 
On Memorial Day 1897, the sculptor Augustus Saint-Gaudens unveiled a memorial to the 54th Massachusetts at the same spot on the Boston Common where the regiment had begun its march to war 34 years before. The statue, a three-dimensional bronze frieze, depicts Robert Gould Shaw and the men of the 54th as they marched heroically off to war. Above them floats an angel holding an olive branch, a symbol of peace, and a bouquet of poppies, a symbol of remembrance. The Shaw Memorial still stands today.
https://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/the-54th-massachusetts-infantry

Hezbollah Added

From the BBC:
"Hezbollah to be added to UK list of terrorist organisations"

The UK Parliament is set to pass new rules classifying Hezbollah as a terrorist group. Parts of the Lebanese organisation have been proscribed since 2001, with its military wing banned since 2008. UK authorities say they are no longer able to distinguish between the group's military and political wings. The changes are expected to take force from Friday, after which supporting Hezbollah will be an offence carrying a sentence of up to 10 years in prison. Hezbollah - translated as the Party of God - is a Shia Islamist political, military and social organisation that wields considerable power in Lebanon. Home Secretary Sajid Javid said he had decided to proscribe the group in its entirety because Hezbollah was "continuing in its attempts to destabilise the fragile situation in the Middle East". The group, which is backed by Iran, has sent thousands of its fighters to Syria to support forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad in battles against predominantly Sunni Muslim rebel forces and the jihadist Islamic State group. Last month, Hezbollah was awarded three cabinet posts in the newly-formed Lebanese cabinet after it made gains, alongside its allies, in the 2018 parliamentary elections. Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt echoed Mr Javid's comments, adding that the government could not be complacent about terrorism. "It is clear the distinction between Hezbollah's military and political wings does not exist, and by proscribing Hezbollah in all its forms, the government is sending a clear signal that its destabilising activities in the region are totally unacceptable and detrimental to the UK's national security," he said. Mr Javid's Israeli counterpart Gilad Erdan welcomed the decision on Twitter and called on the EU to follow suit. Hezbollah was formed as a resistance movement during the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon in the early 1980s.  The militant group's capture of two Israeli soldiers in a cross-border attack led to a month-long war with Israel in 2006.  In addition to Hezbollah, the draft order also proscribes Ansaroul Islam and Jamaat Nusrat al-Islam Wal-Muslimin (JNIM) as terrorist organisations. Ansaroul Islam and JNIM are militant Islamist groups active in West Africa - both have claimed responsibility for attacks in the region. The order - which is expected to be approved by Parliament - will become active from Friday and will put Britain in line with other countries including the US.

^ I guess better late than never. This should have been done years ago. ^

Monday, February 25, 2019

95% Inclusion

From Disability Scoop:
"Inclusion Increasingly The Norm For Students With Disabilities"

More students with disabilities are being educated alongside their typically-developing peers, according to new federal data. Nearly 95 percent of kids with disabilities spent at least part of their day in a regular education classroom in 2016. Over half — 63 percent — were in such classes at least 80 percent of the time. That’s up roughly 6 percent from a decade prior. The figures come from a U.S. Department of Education report to Congress about implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. In sum, the report indicates that more than 6 million students ages 6 to 21 received special education services in the nation’s schools in 2016.  Among students served under IDEA, almost 4 in 10 were classified as having a specific learning disability. The next most common diagnoses were speech or language impairment, other health impairment, autism, intellectual disability and emotional disturbance. The percentage of students identified as having autism more than doubled between 2007 and 2016, the Education Department noted, rising from 0.4 percent to 0.9 percent. The increase was gradual and occurred across all age groups.

^ This is great news. I hope it continues and isn't just a current trend. ^

Windy

It's so windy outside that I saw Mary Poppins flying with her umbrella right to my house.  A big gush of wind came and blew her all the way back England.

Announcing Targets

From the MT:
"After Putin's Warning, Russian TV Lists Nuclear Targets in U.S."

Russian state television has listed U.S. military facilities that Moscow would target in the event of a nuclear strike, and said that a hypersonic missile Russia is developing would be able to hit them in less than five minutes. The targets included the Pentagon and the presidential retreat in Camp David, Maryland. The report, unusual even by the sometimes bellicose standards of Russian state TV, was broadcast on Sunday evening, days after President Vladimir Putin said Moscow was militarily ready for a "Cuban Missile"-style crisis if the United States wanted one. With tensions rising over Russian fears that the United States might deploy intermediate-range nuclear missiles in Europe as a Cold War-era arms-control treaty unravels, Putin has said Russia would be forced to respond by placing hypersonic nuclear missiles on submarines near U.S. waters. The United States says it has no immediate plans to deploy such missiles in Europe and has dismissed Putin's warnings as disingenuous propaganda. It does not currently have ground-based intermediate-range nuclear missiles that it could place in Europe. However, its decision to quit the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty over an alleged Russian violation, something Moscow denies, has freed it to start developing and deploying such missiles. Putin has said Russia does not want a new arms race, but has also dialled up his military rhetoric. Some analysts have seen his approach as a tactic to try to re-engage the United States in talks about the strategic balance between the two powers, something Moscow has long pushed for, with mixed results. In the Sunday evening broadcast, Dmitry Kiselyov, presenter of Russia's main weekly TV news show 'Vesti Nedeli', showed a map of the United States and identified several targets he said Moscow would want to hit in the event of a nuclear war. The targets, which Kiselyov described as U.S. presidential or military command centres, also included Fort Ritchie, a military training centre in Maryland closed in 1998, McClellan, a U.S. Air Force base in California closed in 2001, and Jim Creek, a naval communications base in Washington state. Kiselyov, who is close to the Kremlin, said the "Tsirkon" ('Zircon') hypersonic missile that Russia is developing could hit the targets in less than five minutes if launched from Russian submarines. Hypersonic flight is generally taken to mean travelling through the atmosphere at more than five times the speed of sound. "For now, we're not threatening anyone, but if such a deployment takes place, our response will be instant," he said. Kiselyov is one of the main conduits of state television’s strongly anti-American tone, once saying Moscow could turn the United States into radioactive ash. Asked to comment on Kiselyov's report, the Kremlin said on Monday it did not interfere in state TV's editorial policy. 

^ This is nothing new. My Mom lived a stone's throw away (literally) from one of the Soviet Union's main nuclear targets and my Dad lived a city away from that same target. My Dad was even stationed at that target (where he met my Mom who was working there) and they lived on-base for some time. I remember going to the little PX there when I was little.   
Putin says he wants another Cuban Missile Crisis which is stupid because someone should have told him that the US won that and in doing so helped to cement a coup within in the USSR to remove Khrushchev from power. ^


https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/02/25/after-putins-warning-russian-tv-lists-nuclear-targets-in-us-a64614

Swimming


It's the point in the Winter when I like to remember warmer times and swimming in:
- The Mediterranean Sea (in Israel, Cyprus, Italy and Malta)
- The Caribbean Sea (in the Bahamas, Aruba and Costa Rica)
- The Pacific Ocean (in Costa Rica)
- The Atlantic Ocean (in Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Virginia, North Carolina and Florida)
- The Gulf Of Mexico (in Texas and Florida)
- The Volga River (in Russia)
- The Rhine River (in Germany, Switzerland and the Netherlands)
- The Gulf of Saint Lawrence (in Prince Edward Island)
- The Bay of Fundy (in Campobello Island)
- The North Sea (in the Netherlands)
- The Gulf Of Alaska (in Alaska)
- The Adriatic Sea (in Croatia)
- Lake Geneva (in Switzerland)
- The Blue Lagoon (In Iceland)
- The Dead Sea (in Israel)
- The Great Sacandaga Lake (in New York)
- Lake George (in New York)
- Lake Champlain (in New York, Vermont and Quebec)
- Loch Ness (in Scotland)
- Loch Lomond (in Scotland)
There are many more places I have swum, but they aren't as famous as these ones. When I wasn't swimming in an ocean, sea, gulf or lake I was swimming in my own pool. For the past 10 years I haven't had my own pool.

Male-Only Draft

From USA Today:
"With women in combat roles, a federal court rules male-only draft unconstitutional"

A federal judge in Texas has declared that an all-male military draft is unconstitutional, ruling that "the time has passed" for a debate on whether women belong in the military. The decision deals the biggest legal blow to the Selective Service System since the Supreme Court upheld  the draft registration process in 1981. In Rostker v. Goldberg, the court ruled that a male-only draft was "fully justified" because women were ineligible for combat roles. But U.S. District Judge Gray Miller ruled late Friday that while historical restrictions on women serving in combat "may have justified past discrimination," men and women are now equally able to fight. In 2015, the Pentagon lifted all restrictions for women in military service.  The case was brought by the National Coalition For Men, a men's rights group, and two men who argued an all-male draft was unfair. Men who fail to register with the Selective Service System at their 18th birthday can be denied public benefits such as federal employment and student loans. Women cannot register for Selective Service. The ruling comes as an 11-member commission is studying the future of the Selective Service System, including whether women should be included or whether there should continue to be draft registration at all. The U.S. has maintained an all-volunteer military after the draft was discontinued in 1973, but the Selective Service System was reactivated in 1980 as a contingency in case military conscription becomes necessary again. The National Commission on Military, National and Public Service released an interim report last month giving no hints on where it would come down on those questions. But, commission chairman Joe Heck told USA TODAY, "I don’t think we will remain with the status quo." The government had argued that the court should delay its ruling until that commission makes its recommendations. But Miller said Congress has been debating the issue since 1980, and the commission's final report won't come until next year. And because the commission is advisory, there's no guarantee Congress will act, he said. Miller said Congress has never fully examined whether men are physically better able to serve than women. In fact, he noted in a footnote, "the average woman could conceivably be better suited physically for some of today's combat positions than the average man, depending on which skills the position required. Combat roles no longer uniformly require sheer size or muscle." Quoting the Supreme Court's ruling overturning bans on same-sex marriage, Miller ruled that restrictions based on gender "must substantially serve an important governmental interest today." The judge denied the government's request for a stay of the ruling. Justice Department officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.  But the ruling came in the form of a declaratory judgment and not an injunction, meaning the court didn't specifically order the government how to change Selective Service to make it constitutional. "Yes, to some extent this is symbolic, but it does have some real-world impact," said Marc Angelucci, the lawyer for the men challenging the Selective Service System. "Either they need to get rid of the draft registration, or they need to require women to do the same thing that men do."

^ There is no longer any reason to force only men to register for the Draft. Women can now legally be in combat and so they should be required to register for the Selective Service just as men are required to do. ^

Oscars

I don't get what all the hype is about the Oscars (or any awards show.) Unless you are nominated or personally know someone who is nominated there's no point in caring about them. 

Georgian Remembrace

From Kids.Kiddie.co:
"Soviet Occupation Day (Georgia):

Soviet Occupation Day (Georgian: საბჭოთა ოკუპაციის დღე, sabch'ot'a okupats'iis dge) is a holiday in the country of Georgia. It is observed annually on February 25 to commemorate the Red Army invasion of Georgia in 1921. The holiday was established in 2010 and its first observance was in 2011.  In February 1921, the Red Army, following the post-1917 turmoil in Transcaucasia, entered Georgia, which was then the Menshevik-controlled Democratic Republic of Georgia. The Georgian Menshevik army was defeated and the government fled the country. On February 25, 1921 the Red Army entered the capital Tbilisi and installed a communist government, led by Georgian Bolshevik Filipp Makharadze. The Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic was established on February 25, 1921. For the next 68 years, February 25 was celebrated as an official holiday, the Day of Establishment of Soviet Power in Georgia. On July 21, 2010, Georgia declared February 25 Soviet Occupation Day to recall the Red Army invasion of Georgia in 1921. The Georgian parliament voted in favor of the government’s initiative. The decision, endorsed unanimously by the Parliament of Georgia instructs the government to organize various memorial events on every February 25 and to fly national flags half-staff to commemorate, as the decision puts it, hundreds of thousands of victims of political repressions of the Communist occupational regime. Georgia's establishment of Soviet Occupation Day followed the example of Moldova. Moldova's president Mihai Ghimpu instituted in 2010, Soviet Occupation Day to remember the Soviet occupation on June 28, 1940, but the Constitutional Court cancelled his decree on July 12, 2010. In Latvia the Occupation of the Latvian Republic Day was declared an official remembrance day on May 18, 2000, it is observed on June 17.

^ The Soviet invasion of the Democratic Republic of Georgia (which had only been created after the
collapse of the Czarist Russian Empire in 1917) forced Georgia back into Russia - now the Soviet Union. 3,200 Georgian soldiers were killed and 5,000 Georgian civilians were killed during the Communist invasion. In the end Georgia went from a democratic country to the Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (a Communist Dictatorship) that lasted until the USSR collapsed in December 1991.   Parts of Georgia continue to be occupied - by Russia since 2008: South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Russia claims they are independent countries, but the citizens of those "countries" use the Russian Language, the Russian Ruble, Russian Passports, they receive Government Pensions from Russia and Russian troops occupy their territory. Sometimes if it quacks like a duck and looks like a duck then it's a duck. This is one of those times. ^

Occupation Day


Saturday, February 23, 2019

400 Year Change

From the BBC:
"Churches no longer have to hold Sunday services"

A weekly Sunday service will no longer be compulsory for churches after a vote to change a 400-year-old law was passed by the Church of England's ruling body. The General Synod voted to end the law - dating back to 1603 - which required priests to hold a Sunday service in every church they looked after.  The Bishop of Willesden, who proposed the change, called it "out of date". Meanwhile, the General Synod has introduced six "pastoral principles" to improve the treatment of LGBT people.  Decades of falling church attendances have left some priests looking after up to 20 rural churches. Previously, a rural priest would need to apply for permission from a bishop to not hold a Sunday service in each church.  The Bishop of Willesden - the Right Reverend Pete Broadbent - chairs the Simplification Task Force formed in 2014 to improve the process of the Church of England.  He said changing the law reflected the current practice of priests who look after multiple churches.  Following the vote, he said: "You're meant to get a dispensation from the bishop - this just changes the rules to make it easier for people to do what they're already doing. It stops the bureaucracy. "This was just one (amendment) where we said, 'Out of date, doesn't work, we're operating differently in the countryside now, therefore let's find a way of making it work.'" When asked if the decision would affect elderly churchgoers in rural locations, who might have to travel further to attend a service, Rev Broadbent said: "No, because at the moment this is already regularised and it's already happening." The Reverend Rose Hudson-Wilkin, a chaplain to the Speaker of the House of Commons, said although it was "wonderful" to have "that one day where everyone can concentrate", the Church had to be realistic about people's day to day lives. "Times are changing - it is not just about a shortage of clergy but also the fact that people work on a Sunday," she said. "There is no use in crying over spilt milk. We need to find creative ways to worship." She added that at her churches "Thursday is the new Sunday". At the meeting of the General Synod on Thursday, a document outlining six principles to help improve the treatment of LGBT people was released.  It said the Church had been "found wanting in its welcome and treatment of LGBTI+ people". The "pastoral principles" aim to encourage churches to see "difference as a gift rather than a problem", and build "trust" and "generosity". The principles encourage people to acknowledge their prejudice, make churches places of welcome, conduct theological discussions with respect, "cast out" fear, extend courtesy and kindness to all and refuse to exploit power over others. The document added that adopting the six principles "could be transformative for the Church" but would "require a change of culture in terms of the quality of our relationships". 


^ This is surprising considering that Protestant Churches (like the Church of England) allow men and women (gay or straight and married or single) to be a minister. I knew there was a shortage of Catholic priests (which can only be men, straight and single), but not about the Protestant minister shortages. ^


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-47326993


Faking Crime


Base Food

From Military.com:
"These New Restaurants Are Coming to Army, Air Force Bases in 2019"

Panda Express and Muscle Maker Grill are among the new restaurants coming to Air Force and Army bases this year, officials with the Army and Air Force Exchange (AAFES) told Military.com. AAFES manages restaurant contracts on Army and Air Force bases, including deals with familiar brands such as Subway and Starbucks. Other restaurants, like P.F. Chang's, currently at Ramstein Air Base, Germany, and coming soon to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, are contracted by base morale and welfare officials. On-base food fans will get a break from Burger King and Taco Bell this year, as officials open a variety of new options and expand others. Chinese fast-food restaurant Panda Express will open this year at Fort Meade, Maryland; Fort Benning and Fort Stewart, Georgia; and Travis Air Force Base, California, AAFES officials said. Healthy menu-focused Muscle Maker Grill will open additional locations at Benning; Joint Base Andrews, Maryland; and, according to the company's website, Fort Bragg, North Carolina Qdoba, which opened on several bases last year, including Fort Knox, Kentucky; Fort Lee, Virginia; and Fort Stewart, Georgia, will add more military locations. While a Change.org petition to bring Chick-fil-A to bases continues to circulate and had collected nearly 88,000 signatures as of this writing, AAFES officials declined to comment on whether the restaurant will make an on-base appearance. AAFES officials said they also will be bringing in a few less well known restaurant chains. Chopz, a fast-food outlet that offers healthy options focused on salads, subs, burritos and wraps, will open at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, they said. And Slim Chickens, a fast-food chain primarily located in Texas and Oklahoma, will open locations at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, and Fort Hood, Texas, later this year, they added.

^ As a military brat who has lived on bases (especially outside the US) I know how important it is to have a "taste of home." Food vendors on bases have changed dramatically, for the better, since I lived in Germany. ^

Equal Twins

From the BBC:
"Judge grants US citizenship to twin son of same-sex couple"

A twin boy born to American and Israeli same-sex parents was wrongly denied US citizenship when his twin brother was not, a US judge has ruled. The judge in Los Angeles found that the state department was wrong to request biological evidence that the boy was blood-related to his American father. The US had originally only granted citizenship to his brother after his test showed DNA from the American dad. The case was one of two filed on behalf of gay American couples with twins. Pro-LGBT immigration group Immigration Equality, which brought the case on behalf of parents Andrew and Elad Dvash-Banks, cheered the ruling. "This is a huge victory for Ethan Dvash-Banks and his family," said Aaron C Morris, executive director of Immigration Equality. "Ethan will no longer be considered the undocumented twin of his brother Aiden," said Mr Morris, who also acts as a lawyer for the couple. 

Why was only one child granted US citizenship?
The boys were born via surrogacy while the married parents were living in Toronto. Ethan was conceived using his Israeli father's sperm and Aiden by his American father's. Because only one child shared a biological relationship with the American, a US consular officer rejected the parents' application for citizenship, while also awarding a passport to their other two-year-old boy. Mr Morris argued they had been discriminated against because they are gay, and that heterosexual couples would not have been subjected to such scrutiny. But the state department pointed to guidance on its website that says "a child abroad must be biologically related to a US parent" in order to acquire US citizenship. "For two years, this is something that weighed on us every single day," said Andrew Dvash-Banks. "Not knowing whether Ethan would be allowed to stay in the US is something we went to bed with every night. Now, our family is whole and safe." The couple had chosen not to reveal which child was born by each father's biological material, but ultimately consented to a DNA test after a series of questions from consular officials that they found intrusive and offensive.

What was the ruling? 
US District Judge John F Walter of the Central District of California ruled on Thursday that the Trump administration's US Department of State had wrongly interpreted a statute related to birthright citizenship, and found that blood is not relevant. He said the fact that the parents are married is sufficient enough to grant Ethan his American citizenship. The courts "have come to the conclusion that there is no biological requirement to pass citizenship if you are a married couple," Mr Morris told the BBC, adding that the parents are feeling "greatly relieved". "They were living with a child that was basically considered to be undocumented and now they have proof from a federal judge that he is a citizen just like his twin brother." "It's more than ridiculous, its almost perverse," he said. "It was so absurd and unnecessary, and the government never explained why they were construing the statute in this way." The State Department has not said whether they will appeal the case. In a brief statement to the BBC, a US Department of State spokesperson said they are "aware" of the ruling, and "are reviewing the ruling in co-ordination with [the] Department of Justice" to determine any further actions. The case is similar to one brought by Immigration Equality on behalf of another couple in London, American Allison Blixt and her Italian wife Stefania Zaccari. Mr Morris, who is also representing the women, said he hopes the judge's ruling in California should be enough to persuade the Washington DC court to grant citizenship to their child.

^ This is a very interesting case and deals with US Nationality on several different levels. ^

Anti-Semitism

Anti-Semitism

Anti-Semitism, sometimes called history’s oldest hatred, is hostility or prejudice against Jewish people. The Nazi Holocaust is history’s most extreme example of anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism did not begin with Adolf Hitler: Anti-Semitic attitudes date back to ancient times. In much of Europe throughout the Middle Ages, Jewish people were denied citizenship and forced to live in ghettos. Anti-Jewish riots called pogroms swept the Russian Empire during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and anti-Semitic incidents have increased in parts of Europe, the Middle East and North America in the last several years.
The term anti-Semitism was first popularized by German journalist Wilhelm Marr in 1879 to describe hatred or hostility toward Jews. The history of anti-Semitism, however, goes back much further.
Hostility against Jews may date back nearly as far as Jewish history. In the ancient empires of Babylonia, Greece, and Rome, Jews—who originated in the ancient kingdom of Judea—were often criticized and persecuted for their efforts to remain a separate cultural group rather than taking on the religious and social customs of their conquerors. With the rise of Christianity, anti-Semitism spread throughout much of Europe. Early Christians vilified Judaism in a bid to gain more converts. They accused Jews of outlandish acts such as “blood libel”—the kidnapping and murder of Christian children to use their blood to make Passover bread. These religious attitudes were reflected in anti-Jewish economic, social and political policies that pervaded into the European Middle Ages.
Anti-Semitism in Medieval Europe 
Many of the anti-Semitic practices seen in Nazi Germany actually have their roots in medieval Europe. In many European cities, Jews were confined to certain neighborhoods called ghettos. Some countries also required Jews to distinguish themselves from Christians with a yellow badge worn on their garment, or a special hat called a Judenhut. Some Jews became prominent in banking and moneylending, because early Christianity didn’t permit moneylending for interest. This resulted in economic resentment which forced the expulsion of Jews from several European countries including France, Germany, Portugal and Spain during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Jews were denied citizenship and civil liberties, including religious freedom throughout much of medieval Europe.
Poland was one notable exception. In 1264, Polish Prince Bolesław the Pious issued a decree allowing Jews personal, political and religious freedoms. Jews did not receive citizenship and gain rights throughout much of Western Europe, however, until the late 1700s and 1800s.
Russian Pogroms 
Throughout the 1800s and early 1900s, Jews throughout the Russian Empire and other European countries faced violent, anti-Jewish riots called pogroms. Pogroms were typically perpetrated by a local non-Jewish population against their Jewish neighbors, though pogroms were often encouraged and aided by the government and police forces. In the wake of the Russian Revolution, an estimated 1,326 pogroms are thought to have taken place across Ukraine alone, leaving nearly half a million Ukrainian Jews homeless and killing an estimated 30,000 to 70,000 people between 1918 and 1921. Pogroms in Belarus and Poland also killed tens of thousands of people.
Nazi Anti-Semitism 
Adolf Hitler and the Nazis rose to power in Germany in the 1930s on a platform of German nationalism, racial purity and global expansion. Hitler, like many anti-Semites in Germany, blamed the Jews for the country’s defeat in World War I, and for the social and economic upheaval that followed. Early on, the Nazis undertook an “Aryanization” of Germany, in which Jews were dismissed from civil service, Jewish-owned businesses were liquidated and Jewish professionals, including doctors and lawyers, were stripped of their clients.
The Nuremberg Laws of 1935 introduced many anti-Semitic policies and outlined the definition of who was Jewish based on ancestry. Nazi propagandists had swayed the German public into believing that Jews were a separate race. According to the Nuremberg Laws, Jews were no longer German citizens and had no right to vote.
Kristallnacht 
Jews became routine targets of stigmatization and persecution as a result. This culminated in a state-sponsored campaign of street violence known as Kristallnacht (the “night of broken glass”), which took place between November 9-10, 1938. In two days, more than 250 synagogues across the Reich were burned and 7,000 Jewish businesses looted. The morning after Kristallnacht, 30,000 Jewish men were arrested and sent to concentration camps.
Holocaust 
Prior to Kristallnacht, Nazi policies toward Jews had been antagonistic but primarily non-violent. After the incident, conditions for Jews in Nazi Germany became progressively worse as Hitler and the Nazis began to implement their plan to exterminate the Jewish people, which they referred to as the “Final Solution” to the “Jewish problem.” Between 1939 and 1945, the Nazis would use mass killing centers called concentration camps to carry out the systematic murder of roughly 6 million European Jews in what would become known as the Holocaust.
Anti-Semitism in the Middle East 
Anti-Semitism in the Middle East has existed for millennia, but increased greatly since World War II. Following the establishment of a Jewish State in Israel in 1948, the Israelis fought for control of Palestine against a coalition of Arab states. At the end of the War, Israel kept much of Palestine, resulting in the forced exodus of roughly 700,000 Muslim Palestinians from their homes. The conflict created resentment over Jewish nationalism in Muslim-majority nations. As a result, anti-Semitic activities grew in many Arab nations, causing most Jews to leave over the next few decades. Today, many North African and Middle Eastern nations have little Jewish population remaining.
Anti-Semitism in Europe and the United States 
Anti-Semitic hate crimes have spiked in Europe in recent years, especially in France, which has the world’s third largest Jewish population. In 2012, three children and a teacher were shot by a radical Islamist gunman in Toulouse, France. In the wake of the mass shooting at the satirical weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris in 2015, four Jewish hostages were murdered at a Kosher supermarket by an Islamic terrorist.
The U.K. logged a record 1,382 hate crimes against Jews in 2017, an increase of 34 percent from previous years. In the United States, anti-Semitic incidents rose 57 percent in 2017—the largest single-year increase ever recorded by the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish civil rights advocacy organization.

Mailbox

"I refuse to use my mailbox until it has a gender-neutral name."

^ This is funny because it shows how overboard people get on different issues. For those that don't know mailbox sounds like male-box in and English (even though male-box is not an actual word.) I wonder how crazy these same people would get if they spoke another language, other than English, where every word has a gender and you have to use that gender to conjugate and to speak. Maybe they would refuse to use every word in that language and remain silent. That would benefit us all. ^

Leaving 200

From the BBC:
"Syria war: US to leave 200 troops for peacekeeping after withdrawal"


The US military will keep 200 troops in Syria to serve as a peacekeeping force after it pulls out most of its soldiers, the White House says.  President Donald Trump has come under fierce criticism for his decision last December to withdraw 2,000 troops. He said the Islamic State group (IS) had been "defeated", but critics warn the group has not disappeared entirely. The latest announcement comes as the battle to turf IS out of the last pocket it holds in Syria continues. US-backed fighters belonging to the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) alliance are making fresh attempts to evacuate civilians from Baghuz, a village in eastern Syria on the Iraqi border. An estimated 300 IS fighters are thought to be holed up inside a tiny pocket of land. President Trump's announcement of a rapid withdrawal in late December took US allies and his own military and defence advisers by surprise back in late December. It prompted concerns that Turkey could attack Kurdish forces, who have been working with the US to battle IS in Syria. US officials said American forces were initially given 30 days to leave Syria, but Mr Trump later said the withdrawal would be slowed down.  Speaking at a press conference on Thursday, White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said: "A small peacekeeping group of about 200 will remain in Syria for a period of time." Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who was a vocal opponent of the withdrawal decision, praised Mr Trump's latest move and said the troops would work "as part of an international stabilising force". US troops currently have a presence in a network of bases and airstrips in an arc across north-eastern Syria.  This shift in the US position may to some extent reassure its Kurdish allies and help to keep some small elements of allied troops and special forces on the ground.  The troops have been described as "peacekeepers" by the White House but they clearly will be helping to keep the Kurdish forces credible and linking them up to US air power if necessary.  Ostensibly this is about preventing the resurgence of IS and it also prevents an even deeper push into Syria by the Turks.  But the fact that one of the two remaining US bases will be in the south east, near to Syria's border with Iraq and Jordan, shows that countering Iranian influence remains one of the central guiding principles of the US approach.  However, this still falls far short of a comprehensive strategy for the future of Syria or the region and, for Washington's Kurdish allies, may just be a temporary blessing.   The SDF alliance has IS militants surrounded in their final populated stronghold in Syria, but says it has delayed its final attack to allow remaining civilians to be evacuated.  A convoy of about 30 trucks was seen carrying mainly women and children out of the area on Friday, but the SDF warns that thousands of civilians remain.   Some 20,000 civilians are estimated to have already fled the area in recent weeks, but these departures stalled earlier this week.  Most have been taken by the SDF to a makeshift camp for displaced people in Hassakeh province, north-eastern Syria. Among them are the wives and children of IS militants and many foreign nationals.  They include British teenager Shamima Begum and American woman Hoda Muthana, who are both in limbo after being told by their respective governments they no longer have citizenship.  Separately, the jihadist group said it was behind a car bomb attack at an oil field 100 miles north of Baghuz, which killed at least 13 people, including SDF soldiers, on Thursday. The fall of the last IS territorial stronghold in Syria is significant - but experts have warned the group's ideological pull endures. At its height, five years ago, IS controlled 88,000 sq km (34,000 sq miles) of territory stretching from western Syria to eastern Iraq.

^ If Trump is going to leave 200 American soldiers in Syria then he better make sure they have everything they need to do the mission and to stay safe. Those 200 are men and women and not just a number to play around with to appease others. ^