From the BBC:
“Brexit: EU
starts legal action against UK over Brexit deal”
The EU has
begun legal proceedings against the UK after it refused to ditch plans to
override sections of its Brexit divorce deal. An EU deadline for the government
to remove sections of the Internal Market Bill expired on Wednesday. The
"letter of formal notice" could eventually lead to a court case
against the UK at the European Court of Justice, the EU's top court. But the EU
has not walked away from talks over a post-Brexit trade deal. European
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the UK would have until the end
of November to respond to the EU's concerns over the draft legislation. UK-EU
trade talks are continuing in Brussels this week. Prime Minister Boris Johnson
has said both sides should "move on" if a deal was not reached by
mid-October. In a brief statement, Mrs von der Leyen said the bill was a
"full contradiction" of previous UK commitments over how a hard
border on the island of Ireland should be avoided. She added that the bill was
by its "very nature a breach of the obligation of good faith"
contained in the withdrawal agreement that took the UK out of the EU in
January. A spokesperson for the UK government said the bill was a necessary
"safety net" to protect trade between different parts of the UK. They
added the government would respond the EU's letter "in due course".
What powers
does the EU have? Although the headline is dramatic, this was the EU's next
logical step. When it fired the UK an ultimatum to scrap the most
controversial parts of the Internal Market Bill by the end of September, it
knew it would likely have to follow up on its threat. And now it has. But
any legal path is long and unpredictable - with no resolution likely to come
before the UK's transition period ends on 31 December. The legal advice
given to the EU member states has been that for any alleged breach of the
withdrawal agreement committed in 2020, they would have a further four years to
pursue the UK. For any alleged breach committed after the transition
period, the EU could use the dispute settlement mechanism (which both sides
agreed to in the agreement) to penalise and fine the UK. Or, it could
ask the European Court of Justice to do the same. But this is drawn out legal
territory. It seems the latest legal development will not torpedo the
ongoing trade talks - for now. Both sides insist they do want a deal
within the coming weeks, but the EU says it won't sign one off, as long as the
UK's bill remains as it is. The EU and the UK are now trying to walk two
tightropes hand-in-hand, but looking dead ahead. One route leads to a
trade deal, the other to a ugly court battle. And it's precarious balancing
act. MPs gave their final backing to the Internal Market Bill earlier
this week. However, it will have to be approved by the House of Lords before it
becomes law. In a bid to head off a potential rebellion from Tory
backbenchers, ministers have granted the Commons a say before powers to
override the Brexit divorce deal could be used. Boris Johnson reached a
deal with Tory MPs to amend the bill earlier this month. The letter sent
to the UK is the first stage in the process the Commission uses against
countries it believes have broken EU law. It can end with the Commission
taking governments to court at the European Court of Justice. The ECJ
continues to have powers over the UK during the transition period, including
over the interpretation and implementation of the withdrawal agreement. The
court has powers to force countries to comply with its rulings, including
imposing financial penalties. However, most cases are settled before
then - and it can take many years for a case to move through the court.
What is the
Internal Market Bill? The bill sets out rules for the operation of the UK
internal market - trade between England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland -
after the end of the Brexit transition period in January.
It proposes:
No new checks on goods moving from Northern Ireland to the rest of Great
Britain. Giving UK ministers powers to modify or "disapply"
rules relating to the movement of goods that will come into force from 1
January if the UK and EU are unable to reach an alternative agreement through a
trade deal. Powers to override previously agreed obligations on state
aid - government support for businesses.. The bill explicitly states that
these powers should apply even if they are incompatible with international law.
Ministers say the legislation is needed to prevent "damaging"
tariffs on goods travelling from the rest of the UK to Northern Ireland if
negotiations with the EU on a free trade agreement fail.
^ The UK should
not break international law and pass this bill. ^
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.