Saturday, April 26, 2014

Protest Museum

From the BBC:
"Tiananmen Square protest museum opens in Hong Kong"

The world's first museum dedicated to the 1989 pro-democracy protests in Beijing's Tiananmen Square has opened in Hong Kong. Organisers hope in particular to attract visitors from mainland China. The protests are still a taboo topic in mainland China but Hong Kong operates under a more liberal legal system. June will see the 25th anniversary of the Chinese army's violent suppression of the protests, leading to the deaths of hundreds of people. The new museum is in the Tsim Sha Tsui district of Hong Kong and has been opened after years of planning and fundraising by pro-democracy activists. In the past few weeks, the museum itself has become controversial, the BBC's Juliana Liu reports from Hong Kong. Other occupants of the same building want the museum shut down, citing safety concerns, our correspondent adds. But the museum's backers believe these efforts are being orchestrated by Communist Party officials.  Beijing considers the weeks of peaceful protest by students and workers to have been a "counter-revolutionary" revolt, and defends the decision to send in tanks and troops to end it on 3-4 June 1989. The Chinese authorities have never provided an official death toll.

^ It makes sense for Hong Kong to open the museum there since it can't be opened in China itself. ^

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-27172041

Oregon Dominos

From USA Today:
"Oregon leaving online health exchange for U.S. site"

After months of trying to get its problem-plagued online health exchange to work, Oregon on Friday officially gave up on the state portal and decided to switch to the federal website — the first state in the nation to do so. An early adapter and early enthusiast of the Affordable Care Act, Oregon was once seen as the national leader in health care reform. The progressive state's ambitious vision for its exchange, its colossal multimillion-dollar failure, and the inability to fix the glitch-filled site illustrate the complexity of the health care law and the challenges for states that decided to build their own exchanges. Oregon, which so far has failed to enroll a single person in coverage in one sitting through its exchange, decided to ditch the exchange because officials said fixing it would be too costly at $78 million and would take too long. Switching to the federal system will cost just $4 million to $6 million and is the least risky option. Oregon's exchange is seen as the worst in more than a dozen states that developed their own online health insurance marketplaces. Oregonians must use a time-consuming hybrid paper-online process to sign up for insurance. The state also had to hire more than 400 workers to aid in the manual enrollment process — that despite $134 million Oregon paid its main technology contractor Oracle Corp. to build the online exchange. Oregon received a monthlong enrollment-deadline extension because of the technology problems. Several other states, which have experienced major problems with their exchanges, are also debating their futures — although it's unclear how many, if any, will switch to the federal portal. Already, one other state has chosen to replace its site: Maryland recently decided to adopt the technology used on Connecticut's successful exchange. Of the 14 states and the District of Columbia that built their own exchanges, some portals are running smoothly, including in California, Washington state, Connecticut and Kentucky. But in a half dozen states, technical troubles have cropped up after exchanges launched last October, marring implementation of the health-care overhaul. Exchange glitches have led states to firing technology contractors, exchange leaders resigning, cost overruns, and officials trying to figure out how — or if — to salvage their portals. Nevada, whose portal has also been wracked with problems since it went live Oct. 1, is sticking with its state-run exchange, at least for now. The state is awaiting an analysis by Deloitte Consulting on problems with the system built by Xerox and recommendations on whether the exchange should be fixed or scrapped. In Hawaii, where the exchange site also had a rocky start and the state has enrolled just 8,000 people, some lawmakers were talking about switching to the federal exchange, though there is no formal process to consider the switch at this time. Instead, legislators are considering giving up to $3.5 million to Hawaii's troubled exchange next year so it can stay afloat. Massachusetts, another state with a problem-plagued exchange, is considering whether to partner with a new vendor to rebuild key components of its portal, ditch the site and adopt another state's exchange or use the federal site. Exchange leaders from Massachusetts, Maryland and Oregon plan to meet with officials at the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to iron out the details of their exchanges' futures. New Mexico is going in the opposite direction — switching from the federal site to using just a state-based computer system. Right now, New Mexico uses the federal portal for enrolling individuals while a state-based exchange handles enrollment of small businesses. The state plans to switch fully to a state-based system. For its part, Oregon will continue using the current technology for Medicaid enrollments, but it will have to improve on the system. Officials estimated the cost of the improvements at about $35 million. They said the federal government would pay 90 percent of those costs and of the costs of switching to the federal exchange. In total, Oregon has spent nearly $250 million of the $305 million it received from the federal government under the Affordable Care Act. Republicans blasted Cover Oregon after its board approved ditching the beleaguered site. "Today's decision by Cover Oregon to move to the federal health exchange after months of false assurances is an incredibly embarrassing moment for the state of Oregon," state Rep. Mike McLane, R-Powell Butte, said in a statement. "Oregonians were sold false promises, and all we got was a faulty, unfinished product ..." But Cover Oregon officials defended the exchange and its technology work. "There's a lot of disappointment. There was a lot of passion for the project," said Cover Oregon interim executive director Clyde Hamstreet. "But I don't think it's all a waste. There's a lot of value in what's been done." In March, the federal Government Accountability Office announced an investigation of Oregon's exchange, including looking at whether the federal government can reclaim grant money given to Cover Oregon if taxpayer funds were mismanaged.
An independent investigation ordered by Gov. John Kitzhaber found state managers repeatedly failed to heed reports about technical problems that prevented the Cover Oregon exchange from launching. It also found Oracle did a shoddy job in building the exchange. Five Oregon officials connected to the development of the Cover Oregon portal have resigned.  Officials said they will keep the Cover Oregon website throughout 2014, but it will be redesigned to direct people to the federal site. Oregon also will use the federal call center, but it will retain some front-end customer outreach, education efforts and initial carrier management. Because HealthCare.Gov enrolls people only in private health plans, Oregonians found eligible for Medicaid will be redirected to the Oregon Health Authority, a state agency that can enroll them in the Oregon Health Plan, Oregon's version of Medicaid.

^ The first domino was the Federal Health Care Exchange website failing. The second is Oregon's Exchange. Who says there is no Domino Theory? ^


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/25/oregon-health-exchange/8180537/

Friday, April 25, 2014

Downgraded Russia

From the BBC:
"Russia's credit rating downgraded by S&P"

Credit ratings agency Standard & Poor's has cut Russia's rating to one notch above "junk" status. The move comes as foreign investors continue to take money out of the country amid tensions over the situation in Ukraine. S&P downgraded Russia's rating to 'BBB-' from 'BBB'. Also on Friday, Russia's central bank raised its key interest rate from 7% to 7.5% as it sought to defend the value of the rouble. Announcing the downgrade, S&P said: "In our view, the tense geopolitical situation between Russia and Ukraine could see additional significant outflows of both foreign and domestic capital from the Russian economy." The agency said this could "further undermine already weakening growth prospects". It warned that further downgrades were possible if the West imposed tighter sanctions against Moscow. Investors have been pulling money out of Russia since last year when the country's economy ran into trouble, but this process has intensified in recent weeks amid concerns over Ukraine.  In the first three months of this year, foreign investors have withdrawn $63.7bn (£37bn) from Russia, and economic growth has slowed significantly - it is expected to grow at no more than 0.5% during 2014. Russian shares, which have traded lower this week, fell further following the downgrade, with the MICEX stock index slipping over 1.6% at one stage. Russia's central bank said its rate rise was because of a higher inflation risk and the weakness of the rouble. The Russian currency has lost nearly 8% against the dollar this year. The bank said its move would enable it to lower inflation to 6% by the end of 2014 and added it did not plan on cutting rates in coming months. Russia's Economy Minister Alexei Ulyukayev dismissed S&P's move, saying that "partially, it is kind of a politically motivated decision". However, analysts said other credit rating agencies were likely to follow suit. "Russia is going backwards as reflected by developments in relations with Ukraine and the West," said Timothy Ash, analyst at Standard Bank. He said the move was "bad for investment, bad for capital flows, and bad for broader political, economic reform and institutional reform".

^ The true economic effects of Russia's military strategy is starting to really affect both the Russian Government and the ordinary people. It is one thing for countries/organizations to target specific individuals and companies and another to target a whole country and its people. The last move hurts more people. Russians have struggled through economic problems and shortages throughout most of the 20th and 21st centuries (through revolutions, a civil war, World Wars, a centrally-controlled economy that favored the military or the consumer, to a collapsed country and then a collapsed banking system) so the ordinary Russian knows what to do to survive it. I only hope that the Russian Government will see this latest move and start thinking of the hardworking, ordinary person that this will affect and work to correct things. Russia is a great country (despite my not agreeing with some of its policies and actions I am still a Russophile.) I would love to see the country open itself up more to the world and to thrive internally as well. That way more foreigners could see what I saw and fell in love with in Russia and the Russian people could have a better standard of living and not have to struggle so much. ^

http://www.bbc.com/news/business-27159423

Best/Worst US

From the USA Today:
"Which U.S. states have the most pride?"

People who live in Montana and Alaska have the most state pride, according to a poll by Gallup.
In these two states, 77% of residents said their state was the best or one of the best possible states to live in. Among the worst places to live in are Illinois, Rhode Island and Mississippi according to residents. Residents who have a lot of state pride also "generally boast a greater standard of living, higher trust in state government, and less resentment toward the amount they pay in state taxes," according to Gallup. The poll shows a correlation between positive attitudes and the state's location in a mountainous region with cold weather. The bottom 10 states show a correlation between negative attitudes and state's location east of the Mississippi River or bordering it. Most survey respondents did not say their state was the single best place to live, preferring instead to say it was "one of the best." Texans were most likely to say their state was the very best place to live. Gallup conducted the poll from June to December 2013 and interviewed at least 600 residents in each state.

Top 10 places to live:
1. Montana
2. Alaska
3. Utah
4. Wyoming
5. Texas
6. Hawaii
7. New Hampshire
8. North Dakota
9. Colorado
10: Vermont

Worst 10 places to live:
1. Rhode Island
2. Illinois
3. Mississippi
4. Louisiana
5. Michigan
6. New Mexico
7. New Jersey
8. Maryland
9. Missouri
10. Connecticut

^ This made me laugh. I think Alaska would be nice to live in, but is very expensive overall. Hawaii is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there. I have family in New Hampshire and the natives there are not the typical New Englanders (where they don't trust outsiders until they get to know you.) They tend to be very arrogant and not overly intelligent. They also don't use any spices in their food (salt or pepper) and so everything's bland and nothing but hospitals and gas stations are open 24 hours.  I have family in and from Texas and no matter what every Texan loves their state. I don't get it. I almost moved to Vermont and was lucky the deal went through because there are more cows than people and it is too socialist for me. I have family in Colorado and have been there a lot and couldn't live there because of the high altitude. As for worst places to live. I agree that New Jersey should be on the list. It is the "Garden State" yet it has mostly weeds. Even the State Government  thinks its residents are dumb since they don't allow anyone to pump their own gas. I was surprised to see Rhode Island and Connecticut on this worst list. Lots of New York's rich live in Connecticut and work in the city. Mississippi doesn't shock me since they constantly win all the bad titles like the fattest state, etc. While this list doesn't change my view of these states it was a nice little read. ^

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/04/25/state-pride-gallup-montana-alaska/8140879/

Water Woes

From the BBC:
"Russia fears Crimea water shortage as supply drops"

Russian officials say a water shortage in Crimea is threatening to become acute as Ukraine has reduced the supply via a key canal. Ukraine does not recognise the new authorities in Crimea who are backed by Moscow. Russia made the peninsula part of its territory last month.  Crimea's harvest of grapes, rice, maize and soya will be ruined if it does not get more water soon, officials say. Russia says the Crimea-Ukraine border is now officially a state border. The Russian government plans to establish permanent checkpoints there, as well as new rules for entering or leaving Crimea, Ria Novosti news agency reports. The North Crimea Canal delivers water to Crimea from the River Dnieper, in Ukraine's southern Kherson region. The canal accounts for 80% of Crimea's water. The current water shortage is threatening 120,000 hectares (296,000 acres) of Crimea's crops, which rely on irrigation, Russian Agriculture Minister Nikolai Fedorov said. A ruined harvest across that area would mean losses of up to 5bn roubles (£83m; $140m), he told the Gazeta.ru news website.  BBC reporter in Crimea recently said the water supply was one of the chief concerns of local people, ahead of the controversial March referendum on joining Russia.  The canal authorities in Ukraine say Crimea has accumulated a huge debt for water supplied last year. The dispute is aggravated by the breakdown in relations between Kiev and Moscow.  The water supply to Crimea has diminished from 50 cu m (1,765 cu ft) per second to about 16 cu m per second, Crimea's new pro-Russian authorities say. To deal with the shortage, new wells could be dug or water could be brought in from Russia, but such options are expensive, officials warn. Masked Russian-speaking gunmen blockaded Ukrainian military units in Crimea last month, leading to the peninsula's annexation by Russia - a move condemned internationally.  Russia's President Vladimir Putin later admitted that regular Russian forces had helped pro-Russian militants in Crimea. Most of the local population is Russian-speaking and Sevastopol is the base of Russia's Black Sea Fleet.

^ Everything was fine in the Crimea until Russia invaded, occupied and annexed it last month. Russia created the water problem themselves (along with numerous other ones.) I understand why the Ukraine is restricting water to the Crimea (considering it was stolen from them and also Russia has been taking gas from the Ukraine.) It does seem like another reason Russia will use to take over eastern Ukraine if not the rest of the country. ^

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27155885

Automatic Organs

From the Globe and Mail:
"Nova Scotia eyes making organ donation automatic"

The Nova Scotia government is considering becoming the first province to make organ donation automatic unless people opt out before they die, a proposal that could reignite the debate about whether presumed consent laws should be enacted elsewhere to help the thousands of Canadians awaiting a transplant  Health Minister Leo Glavine said he is preparing to ask the province’s deputy health minister to lead an online public consultation asking Nova Scotians whether they would support a “reverse onus” law that would compel people to register their opposition if they do not want their organs harvested after death. “It would make available additional organs each and every year,” Mr. Glavine said in an interview. “[Reverse onus] is a considerable step to move from where we are, but one that Nova Scotians have expressed a desire for us to investigate. As a government, we’re prepared to now go down that path.” The consultation is expected to take a few months, he added.
Advocates of presumed consent say the approach could increase Canada’s deceased donor rate, which has inched up in the past decade, but remains low compared with other developed nations. Opponents warn it could deprive people of the right to control what happens to their bodies after death without guaranteeing an uptick in organ donations. Canada had 15.5 deceased donors per million in 2012, according to a report released in February by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI.) In France, Italy and the United States, the rate is between 20 and 30 per million. Spain, which has a presumed consent law, has more than 30 deceased donors per million. Spain’s success is not necessarily proof presumed consent works, said Ronnie Gavsie, president and chief executive of Trillium Gift of Life Network, which co-ordinates deceased donations in Ontario.
Prince Edward Island began looking into a reverse onus law in 2012 and the idea is still on the table, according to Angela Carpenter, the province’s new organ and tissue donation and transplant manager. But PEI is not pursuing such a law, she said. Ontario convened a citizens’ panel on organ donation in 2007 that rejected presumed consent. “A number [of participants] argued it was a violation of civil rights and said this negative option approach was not acceptable in Ontario. The major concern focused on doubts that the government would properly inform everyone, especially new Canadians, those whose mother tongue is neither English nor French, and those with mental disabilities,” the panel said in its report.

^ I don't like any of this. People should be automatically enrolled to give up their organs and have to opt out. It should be the usual rule of opting in to be a donor. I understand it would help save more lives, but it is too great of a cost in the lost of personal freedom. If these laws pass the next step would be for the Government to force every living person to give their organs. I mean you can live will only one kidney right? This is just an all-out bad idea. ^



http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/education/nova-scotia-eyes-making-organ-donation-automatic/article18202557/

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Genocide Obama

From Yahoo:
"Obama breaks promise (again) to commemorate Armenian ‘genocide’"

During the 2008 campaign, Barack Obama could not have been clearer about what he thought of the mass killings of Armenians at the hands of Ottoman Turks in 1915. "My firmly held conviction (is) that the Armenian Genocide is not an allegation, a personal opinion, or a point of view, but rather a widely documented fact supported by an overwhelming body of historical evidence," he said in a statement. "The facts are undeniable," Obama wrote. "As President I will recognize the Armenian Genocide." Once in office, though? Not so much. Not at all, in fact. President Obama on Thursday called the slaughter “one of the worst atrocities of the 20th century.” But for the sixth straight year, he did not use the word “genocide” — a move that Armenians would have cheered but would also have risked profoundly angering Turkey, a crucial NATO ally. “I have consistently stated my own view of what occurred in 1915, and my view has not changed,” Obama said in his 2014 statement. “A full, frank, and just acknowledgement of the facts is in all of our interests. “Peoples and nations grow stronger, and build a foundation for a more just and tolerant future, by acknowledging and reckoning with painful elements of the past,” the president added. “We continue to learn this lesson in the United States, as we strive to reconcile some of the darkest moments in our own history.” The issue highlights the chasm between the demands of domestic politics — magnified by a presidential campaign — and those of foreign policy. A better-known version is the aspirant to the White House who promises on the trail to take a hard line on China but bends in the face of managing what is one of the most complex and important American relationships in the world. As a senator, Obama co-sponsored a resolution calling for the use of the term “genocide” when discussing the Armenian tragedy. A similar proposal cleared the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 10 by a 12-5 vote. The only member of the panel not to vote was potential 2016 Republican presidential hopeful Rand Paul. Turkey fiercely disputes the genocide charge and has warned that formal U.S. steps to use the term will hamper relations. Turkey's then-ambassador to Washington, Namik Tan, sharply criticized a similar statement from Obama in 2011, taking to Twitter to denounce it as inaccurate, flawed and one-sided. And Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan issued a statement this week declaring that “using the events of 1915 as an excuse for hostility against Turkey and turning this issue into a matter of political conflict is inadmissible.” “It is indisputable that the last years of the Ottoman Empire were a difficult period, full of suffering for Turkish, Kurdish, Arab, Armenian and millions of other Ottoman citizens, regardless of their religion or ethnic origin,” said Erdogan, who called for a scholarly analysis of the events 99 years ago. Obama’s statement drew a sharp rebuke from Armenian National Committee of America Executive Director Aram Hamparian, who deplored the “sad spectacle” of Obama bowing to Turkey’s “gag rule.” "President Obama continues to outsource his policy on the Armenian Genocide, effectively granting Turkey a veto over America's response to this crime against humanity," Hamparian said. Twenty-two countries have recognized the events of 1915 as genocide, and 42 U.S. states have done so as well, either by legislation or proclamation. Congressional resolutions aimed at doing the same at the national level have never become law. Successive presidents have objected on grounds that doing so risks angering Turkey.

^ There are those Presidents that do great things on domestic issues and fail on foreign issues. There are those Presidents that do great things on foreign issues and fail on domestic issues. Then there is the handful of Presidents who fail on both domestic and international issues. Obama clearly falls under the last category. He has shown himself to be all-talk and no action. He has no back-bone and the rest of the world sees that and doesn't take him seriously. I wouldn't take him seriously either. He messed up Obamacare, unemployment is high, he talked tough on North Korea, Iran and Syria and did nothing. He puts on a tough-guy appearance to Russia and Putin laughs at him to his face. Obama is just the butt of his own jokes. If he ever did what he said he would and did it well it would be something amazing, but well into his 2nd term I don't see that happening. When he isn't on vacation he is hanging out with his celebrity friends and doing anything and everything except fixing the country and the world. When he makes mistakes he has a long list of people to blame - everyone but himself even though the "buck should stop with him." The only good thing is that he will be out of office in 2016 and he will go down in history as useless President - much like Clinton. ^

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-breaks-promise--again--to-commemorate-armenian--genocide-155128834.html

VA Abuses

From the Stars and Stripes:
"CNN: At least 40 vets died while waiting for care at Phoenix VA"

At least 40 U.S. veterans died while waiting for health care at the Phoenix VA, many of whom were placed on a secret waiting list, according to a CNN report. The "elaborate scheme," implemented by top management, was an effort to hide that 1,400 to 1,600 sick veterans waited months to see a doctor, said CNN, citing a former Veterans Administration doctor and other agency staff. The secret list also gave the appearance of shorter appointment wait times, which were reported back to Washington, according to the story. The report quotes a recently retired doctor from the Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Dr. Sam Foote, who explained the protocol for misreporting appointment requests. According to Foote, when vets requested a medical appointment, their info would be entered into hospital computers but not saved. A screen grab of the actual appointment data was printed, added to the secret electronic list, then shredded, erasing any public record that the actual appointment was made. "So the only record that you have ever been there requesting care was on that secret list," Foote said in the CNN story. "And they wouldn't take you off that secret list until you had an appointment time that was less than 14 days so it would give the appearance that they were improving greatly the waiting times, when in fact they were not." The article references the family of a 71-year-old Navy veteran who had difficulty getting a follow-up appointment after they rushed him to the Phoenix VA emergency room because of blood in his urine. Despite a history of cancer and a chart identifying him as urgent, Thomas Breen’s family could not get him in for an appointment. Breen’s wife said she called daily for appointments from late September 2013 through November. Breen died Nov. 30. “They called me December 6,” his wife Sally told CNN. The Phoenix VA Health Care System responded to the story, writing they would “welcome the results from the Office of Inspector General’s review.” The statement went on: “We acknowledge Phoenix VA Health Care System has had longstanding issues with Veterans accessing care and have taken numerous actions to meet demand, while we continue to serve more Veterans and enhance our services.” Lawmakers have since called that all records at the Phoenix VA be preserved, according to CNN.

^ This is beyond disgusting it is criminal. Everyone involved in these secret lists should immediately be fired and never allowed to work in the medical field for the rest of their lives. The VA does more harm than good for veterans and yet nothing seems to change. There are countless stories of these abuses made known all the time and Congress and the Department of Veteran's Affairs continues to keep their heads in the sand. ^


http://www.stripes.com/news/veterans/cnn-at-least-40-vets-died-while-waiting-for-care-at-phoenix-va-1.279589

Armenian Genocide Day

Today is Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day. While it is a national holiday in Armenia it is also recognized around the world. An estimated 1.5 million Armenian men, women and children were murdered by the Turks during and after World War 1. Turkey and many countries around the world (including the US) do not recognize what happened to the Armenians as a genocide.

There are 23 countries that officially recognize the Armenian Genocide. They are: Argentina (since 2003), Armenia (since 1988 - then apart of the USSR), Belgium (since 1998), Canada (since 1996), Chile (since 2007), Cyprus (since 1975), France (since 1998), Germany (since 2004), Greece (since 1999), Italy (since 2000), Lithuania (since 1005), Lebanon (since 1997), the Netherlands (since 2004), Poland (since 2005), Russia (since 1995), Slovakia (since 2004), Sweden (since 2010), Switzerland (since 2003), Uruguay (since 1965), the Vatican (since 2000) and Venezuela (since 2005.) There are several regions within certain countries that also recognize the Genocide even when their national Governments do not. They include: Basque Country, Catalonia, the Baleraic Islands (Spain); Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland (United Kingdom); New South Wales, South Australia (Australia); Tehran (Iran); Sao Paulo, Ceara, Parana (Brazil); Crimea (Ukraine); Quindío (Columbia); Plovdiv, Burgas, Ruse, Stara Zagora, Pazardzhik (Bulgaria.) 43 US States also recognize the Genocide (7 do not: Alabama, Mississippi, West Virginia, Indiana, Iowa, Wyoming, and South Dakota.)

The US Federal Government also does not recognize the Armenian Genocide.  In the United States' several official documents describe the events as "genocide" (1975, 1984, 1996), President Ronald Reagan also described the events as "genocide" in his speech on April 22, 1981.  As of March 4, 2010, the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs has recognized the massacres of 1915 as "genocide.
On January 19, 2008 U.S. Senator Barack Obama released a statement: "Two years ago, I criticized the Secretary of State for the firing of U.S. Ambassador to Armenia, John Evans, after he properly used the term 'genocide' to describe Turkey's slaughter of thousands of Armenians starting in 1915. I shared with Secretary Rice my firmly held conviction that the Armenian Genocide is not an allegation, a personal opinion, or a point of view, but rather a widely documented fact supported by an overwhelming body of historical evidence. The facts are undeniable. An official policy that calls on diplomats to distort the historical facts is an untenable policy. As a senator, I strongly support passage of the Armenian Genocide Resolution (H.Res.106 and S.Res.106), and as President I will recognize the Armenian Genocide". Since becoming president he has retreated from those statements, stating only that his opinion has not changed but refusing to use the word genocide. Despite his previous public recognition and support of genocide bills, as well as the election campaign promises to formally recognize the Armenian Genocide, Obama has thus far, abstained from using the term "genocide".

Next year (2015) is the 100th anniversary of the start of the Armenian Genocide and I would hope that more countries (including the US) would do what is right and recognize the killing of innocent men, women and children of Armenian descent by the Turks for what it was: a genocide. People think it's disgusting for someone to deny the Jewish Holocaust and I believe it is equally as disgusting to deny the Armenian Genocide.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide_recognition

Bribery Death

From the MT:
"Communists Want to Execute Bribe-Taking Officials"

The Communist Party has announced that it will step up its fight against corruption by pushing for an amendment to legislation that suspends capital punishment indefinitely. The proposal, which will be submitted in May, seeks to extend capital punishment to grievous crimes and economic ones. Deputy Vadim Solovyov, a supporter of the law, told Nezavisimaya Gazeta that it should be possible to execute government officials who take bribes exceeding 1 million rubles ($28,000) or embezzle public funds. Capital punishment is the only tool that "can instil order among both criminals and bureaucrats," Solovyov said. Capital punishment is codified by Russian law, but has not been used since 1996 when President Boris Yeltsin put a moratorium over it. In 1999 the Constitutional Court legalized the moratorium, a step that was reaffirmed in 2009. According to a 2013 survey conducted by Levada Center, an independent pollster, 54 percent of Russians support capital punishment, down from 61 percent in 2012. Nevertheless, the government has been reluctant to bow to public opinion with President Vladimir Putin saying that such a measure would be “inadvisable.”  In addition, Russia is a member of the Council of Europe, which forbids its members from carrying out capital punishment at any time.   

^ I support the use of the death penalty in certain cases (ie rape, murder, hate crimes, terrorism, etc.) While I don't think bribery is a good thing I don't think it should be punished by capital punishment. The fact that the Russian Communists want to make it for bribery is ironic since during Soviet times you couldn't get anywhere in society without bribing Communist officials. Even in modern-day Russia bribery is a way of life for everyone. If you make it a crime punishable by death then you won't have anyone left in the country. ^

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/communists-want-to-execute-bribe-taking-officials/498873.html

Holocaust Teaching

From the JP:
"New Holocaust education program in Israel to start in kindergarten"

The Education Ministry announced Wednesday a new comprehensive education program about the Holocaust to be taught to all students from kindergarten through high school. The new program, "In the path of memory" was formulated by a joint committee comprised of Holocaust experts, psychologists and educational consultants from the Education Ministry and the International School for Holocaust Studies at Yad Vashem. "On Holocaust Remembrance Day the kindergarten age children are exposed to the siren that sounds across Israel, and the special broadcasts in the media on the topic. As children do, they absorb the information without the cognitive or emotional ability to comprehend and draw meaning from it," an Education Ministry statement explained.  "The main role of adults and educators on this day is to help the children organize the information they absorbed while preserving their sense of security," the ministry added. The kindergarten teachers will advise parents how to talk to their children about the Holocaust. In addition,  kindergarten teachers have been told by the Education Ministry not to show photographs from the era.  For first and second grade pupils, the ministry has similarly advised teachers to present a non-threatening presentation of history.  The ministry decided that teachers of these grades would focus on a central figure from the period that could create empathy among the students. Schools across Israel will mark Holocaust Remembrance Day with ceremonies on April 27.

^ I'm not sure if teaching kids as young as 5 or 6 about the Holocaust is the best thing. Israeli children have enough violence in their lives (ie Arab invasions/wars, suicide bombs, missiles, etc) and while the Holocaust needs to be taught to everyone (Jew and non Jew) I don't think the young need to know about it. I worked at the US Holocaust Museum in DC and we didn't recommend young children (or young school groups) to come to the Museum. ^

http://www.jpost.com/National-News/New-Holocaust-education-program-in-Israel-to-start-in-kindergarten-350335

Crimean Wall

From the MT:
"Russia Accused of Building New 'Berlin Wall' on Crimean Border"

A former Ukrainian foreign minister has accused Russia of building a new "Berlin Wall" by laying land mines between Crimea and the Ukrainian mainland. "There is only one question remaining for Moscow: They haven't decided yet where" the wall will run, Volodymyr Ogryzko, who served as a foreign minister under former president Viktor Yushchenko, said in comments broadcast by 112 Ukraine. It could go "through eastern Ukrainian regions, across the center of Ukraine, or it could be limited to Crimea," Ogryzko added. Ogryzko also said that by annexing Crimea, severing its connection with Ukraine proper, and planting anti-personnel mines to prevent any attempts at a counter-invasion, Russia was effectively constructing a new "Berlin Wall." Earlier this month, a Ukrainian delegation to a meeting on land mines in Geneva said Russian troops in Crimea were creating minefields "at the entry points between the continental part of Ukraine and Crimean peninsula," AFP reported.   Following the annexation of Crimea last month, concerns have mounted in the West that Russia may move in to take over parts of eastern and central Ukraine.

^ If this is true it won't surprise me in the least. Many people think it was the East German Communists that created the Berlin Wall, but in reality it was spear-headed and officially allowed by the Soviets. They allowed a Wall to be built that eventually had a "death strip" of electric fences, mines, trip-wires, etc. It wouldn't be that far-fetched for Russia to use old tactics in the Crimea. ^

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/russia-accused-of-building-new-berlin-wall-on-crimean-border/498865.html

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Survivor Poverty

From the JP:
"50,000 Holocaust survivors in Israel living in poverty, report finds"

Of the 193,000 Holocaust survivors living in Israel today, some 50,000 live in poverty, according to a report released Wednesday by the Foundation for the Benefit of Holocaust Victims in Israel. The report consisted of several elements, including updated statistics gathered by the Foundation as well as two surveys– one among 400 Holocaust survivors and the second among 500 people from the general public.  Of the Holocaust survivors surveyed, 45% indicated they feel “alone” and one out of every five survivors was forced to choose between food and other necessities during the past two years due to financial problems. Chaya Kujikaro, a 76-year-old Holocaust survivor from Romania could not hold back tears as she described her living situation at the press conference announcing the report.  Kujikaro and her husband made aliya after 1953, and as such she is not entitled to the same rights as Holocaust survivors by the State of Israel. “I want to ask the government, why if you made aliya after 1953 are you not considered a Holocaust survivor?” she asked. Kujikaro lives off of a National Insurance Institute pension with her 90-year-old husband who suffers from heart problems and is confined to a wheel chair. They are forced to spend thousands of shekels every month on medications and medical treatments and their apartment is too small for the wheel chair to fit into the bathroom and shower. “It is very difficult for us and we don't see any exit from this [situation], sometimes we just want to end our lives, but this is not how we want to [die],” she said. Kujikaro is not alone, according to the survey 60% of Holocaust survivors are worried about their financial situation; with 55% of survivors responding that they are unhappy with the way the government treats them.  Furthermore, 61% said they did not feel any difference in the past year with regard to government assistance and treatment. “If the state was a bit more considerate, could help us a little bit, how much longer will we live?” she asked. The findings also indicated that 43% of Holocaust survivors fear that the Holocaust will happen again and one out of three survivors worries that the younger generations will not remember the Holocaust. The survey was conducted by telephone in the second half of March among 400 Holocaust survivors living in Israel and reflects a +/- 4.9% margin of error. In comparison, the public survey findings indicated that a majority of the general population, 84%, believe the treatment of Holocaust survivors was “not good.” Of the respondents, 52% believe that a majority of Holocaust survivors live in poverty and only 10% said they believe the situation of Holocaust survivors was “good or adequate.”   In addition, 56% of the general public said they did not believe there was any change made by the government this past year with regards to treating and assisting Holocaust survivors. The findings also revealed that only 39% of people surveyed said they know a Holocaust survivor.  Despite this, 73% of the respondents believe that the public will remember the Holocaust even after the death of the survivors. The public survey was conducted March 23 and 24 by telephone and questioned some 500 Jewish adults aged 18 and up; the survey reflects a +/- 4.5% margin of error. According to the report, the average age of the Holocaust survivor in Israel today is 85-years-old and some two thirds are women. Each year an estimated 13,000 survivors pass away.  According to the report, during the past year some 70,000 Holocaust survivors requested assistance from the Foundation for the Benefit of Holocaust Victims in Israel. Of the survivors seeking assistance from the foundation, 65% are above the age of 80, and 45% are above the age of 86.  Furthermore, 86% live on a monthly income of less that NIS 5,000 and 66% live on a monthly income of up to NIS 3,000. Earlier this month Finance Minister Yair Lapid announced a NIS one billion national plan to assist Holocaust survivors. The intended budget will be added to the NIS 835 million already allotted by the ministry for the next five years to assist Holocaust survivors.

^ This is just beyond sad. These people survived the worst organized event in human history and yet they continue to be treated as trash. Governments of the world as well as world organizations (Jewish and non Jewish) need to do a whole lot more to make sure that no Holocaust survivor has to beg for either food or medicine. They should be allowed to live the remainder of their years without having to beg, borrow or steal. ^

http://www.jpost.com/National-News/50000-Holocaust-survivors-in-Israel-living-in-poverty-report-finds-350178

Coin Personality

From the BBC:
"Russia: Special Putin coins mark Crimea annexation"

Commemorative coins bearing an image of Russian President Vladimir Putin are being minted at a Russian factory to mark the Kremlin's takeover of Crimea, it appears. Putin's face is on one side of the 1kg (2.2lb) coin while the other shows a map of the Crimean Peninsula, Moscow daily Komsomolskaya Pravda reports. Factory director Vladimir Vasyuhin explains that by bringing the Crimean peninsula "back home", Putin had "demonstrated the qualities of a wise strategist and politician". In March, Russia formally took over control of Crimea from Ukraine, despite international sanctions.  The limited edition of 500 silver coins has been called The Gatherer of Russian Lands - a phrase traditionally associated with Ivan III - better known as Ivan the Great - who significantly expanded Russia's territories during his rule. The coins haven't been priced yet - some of them may be sold, although they won't be used as currency - and the factory says it is planning to present some of them to the Russian leadership. This isn't the first time Putin has been featured on a coin, Russian website Snob.ru says. Ironically, in 2006 Ukraine launched a coin featuring the Russian president, marking 10 years of its national currency, the hryvnia. The coin was encrusted with precious stones and cost $500 (£300).

^ Someone is trying to make a cult of personality for himself (like Stalin and Hitler did.) ^

http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-27117241

Lax Security

From the Globe and Mail:
"How airport security could miss teen’s Hawaii hitchhiking in wheel well"

Surveillance cameras at San Jose International Airport, in the heart of high-tech Silicon Valley, captured a teenager on the tarmac as he climbed up the landing gear of a jet. But in the end, the cameras failed because no one noticed the security breach until the plane – and the boy, lucky to be alive – landed in Hawaii. Although the 15-year-old apparently wanted nothing more than to run away, his success in slipping past layers of security early Sunday morning made it clear that a determined person can still get into a supposedly safe area and sneak onto a plane. Video surveillance can help catch trespassers. Some airports use not just human eyes watching video screens, but also technology that can be programmed to sound an alert when a camera captures something potentially suspicious. But just because something is caught on camera doesn’t mean it will make an impression.
Despite great promise, “sometimes the actual results are quite underwhelming when it gets to the real world, where people are fatigued, people are preoccupied,” said Richard Bloom, an airport security expert at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Arizona. “There’s no way to guarantee security, even if you had one person per video screen.” There were no obvious efforts Monday to increase security or the police presence at airports in San Jose or Maui. In San Jose, airport officials said they were reviewing how the boy slipped through security that includes video surveillance, German shepherds and Segway-riding police officers. While each of those measures can work for certain situations, “the problem is that each layer has its own error factor,” Bloom said. Nobody monitoring security cameras throughout the 424-hectare airport saw anyone approaching the Boeing 767 until they reviewed the footage after the boy was discovered in Hawaii, San Jose airport spokeswoman Rosemary Barnes said. The airport is surrounded by fences, although many sections do not have barbed wire and could easily be scaled. Barnes said the boy went onto the tarmac when it was still dark. The flight took off at about 8 a.m. (PT), about 90 minutes after sunrise. The boy was unconscious most of the 5 1/2-hour flight and didn’t regain consciousness until an hour after the plane landed in Hawaii, FBI spokesman Tom Simon said. When he came to, he climbed out of the wheel well and was immediately seen by Maui airport personnel, Simon said.
Surveillance video at Kahului Airport showed the boy getting out of the wheel well after landing, transportation officials in Hawaii said. The video was not released because of the ongoing investigation. The boy was not charged with a crime, Simon said. While the Transportation Security Administration oversees checkpoint security inside airport terminals, airport perimeters are policed by local authorities and federal law enforcement. Airport police were working with the FBI and TSA to review security. San Jose police said they will forward the findings of their investigation to the district attorney, who can decide whether to file criminal charges in California. Maui County spokesman Rod Antone said the county was not involved with the incident or investigation because the state runs the airports. The Hawaii Department of Transportation said they didn’t plan to investigate further after turning the boy over to state human services, where officials were working to reunite the boy with his family. Isaac Yeffet, a former head of security for the Israeli airline El Al who now runs his own firm, Yeffet Security Consultants, said the breach shows that U.S. airport security still has weaknesses, despite billions of dollars invested. “Shame on us for doing such a terrible job,” he said. “Perimeters are not well protected. We see it again and again.” Congressman Eric Swalwell, who serves on the Homeland Security committee, said on Twitter that the incident demonstrates vulnerabilities that need to be addressed. The FAA says about one-quarter of the 105 stowaways who have sneaked aboard flights worldwide since 1947 have survived. Some wheel-well stowaways survived deadly cold and a lack of oxygen because their breathing, heart rate and brain activity slow down.

^ This just proves that you can throw all the money you want at something and yet unless you have the trained people running things it doesn't make a difference. It seems that airport security in the US is just as poor now as it was 13 years ago. ^


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/how-airport-security-could-miss-us-teens-hawaii-hitchhiking-in-wheel-well/article18090584/

Netflix Prices

From Yahoo:
"Why Netflix is raising your monthly bill as much as 20% — eventually"
 
 Netflix (NFLX) CEO Reed Hastings learned the hard way that announcing a big price increase can blow up into a huge controversy. So for his latest effort to charge more, he’s moving slowly – very slowly.Along with Monday’s quarterly earnings release for Wall Street, Hastings said the cost of Netflix would go up $1 to $2 a month for new customers, depending on the country. Current customers will be “generously grandfathered” for at least a year, maybe two. Hastings had foreshadowed the increase on January’s earnings call as well, confirming that Netflix was testing different price points. But at the current popular price of $7.99 a month, Netflix is growing like mad and expanding worldwide. It gained almost 12 million paying members over the past year and revenue was up 24%. So why the need for a price increase? Further, there's obviously some risk for Hastings with this tactic. Back in 2011, his plan to spin off DVD operations into a new unit called Qwikster and raise prices 60% had immediate consequences, as Netflix lost one million subscribers and its stock plunged almost 80% in a few months. This time, Hastings is eschewing a bold surprise and going for the slow boiling frog approach. “You're talking about $1 or $2 difference per month. I don't think it's a huge difference,” Hastings said on Monday’s call with analysts, in a restrained and tentative tone that sounded almost rehearsed. “And then, yes, the two years is very generous. We'll do it between a year and two years... . We'll be able to announce more details later.” And, so far, the approach is working. There’s been no explosion of angry tweets, no change.org petition calling for Hastings to resign and no sign of mass cancellations. But why take the risk at all? The first culprit is Hollywood. We’re in a so-called golden age of television, thanks in large part to the arrival of talented actors, writers and directors who once only made movies and shunned the “idiot box.” But top talent still wants top pay and their demands are only increasing as Internet companies such as Netflix, Amazon (AMZN) and Hulu compete for original shows against traditional networks and premium cable channels including HBO (TWX), CBS (CBS) and Fox (NWSA). Netflix is spending more than $2 billion a year on content, with over $100 million just for "House of Cards." And its long-term commitments to Hollywood have ballooned to $7.1 billion, up from $5.7 billion a year ago. Even with the growing spending, Netflix lost out in the bidding for HBO’s massive hit crime drama, "True Detective." Also to blame? Wall Street. Shares of Netflix peaked at $458 on March 6 but then plummeted as low as $312.10 on April 15, a 32% skid over five weeks. While investors decided to flee from many of 2013’s top-performing stocks, analysts were also concerned about the growing content costs. Both groups would like to see more of dollars flowing to the bottom line, which the price increase will accomplish, albeit slowly. Some on Wall Street also feared a tiff with Comcast (CMCSA), that ended up with Netflix agreeing to pay for reaching its own customers, could be followed by more demands from other broadband providers. The price increase adds revenue to cover that scenario. The stock had already recovered some of the loss last week, but Monday’s results and the potential for more revenue were even more reassuring, pushing the price back up as much as 7%, to $380, on Tuesday. The Comcast payments, which Hastings complained about further on Monday’s call, could be another rationale for the price hike. So far, the cost of the deal appears to be moderate, but Hastings said he is worried about the future. Broadcast networks already extract billions of dollars from cable companies for retransmission rights of their local stations. If the same model grows online, consumers could end up having to pay a lot more, and not just for Netflix.
Finally, dear reader, take a look in the mirror. Hastings tested higher monthly fees in Ireland, and likely other markets more on the sly. And customers proved so loyal and devoted that they signed up for Netflix at about the same rate, even at higher prices. With more than 48 million members worldwide and award-winning original shows, the company’s message is no longer just "come to Netflix to save on your cable bill." “We've realized through testing that we don't need to be running around saying ‘Netflix free trial’ nearly as much. That's very commercial and reductionist,” Hastings explained. “By focusing on the core elements of member satisfaction and the content that you get if you join Netflix, we can get to a much bigger market share and a better connection with members.”
In other words, dear Netflix fans, the fault lies not in our stars but in ourselves.

^ I guess Netflix thinks its customers are too stupid to understand when prices, even a little at a time, are raised. I use the mail order version of Netflix (because I can't get the streaming service on my mountain. ^

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/the-exchange/why-netflix-is-raising-your-monthly-bill-as-much-as-20-----eventually-145642005.html

Better Stroke Care

From USA Today:
"Hospitals pushing faster stroke care get better results"

Hospitals that make an all-out push for faster stroke care get a clot-busting medication to patients more quickly, prevent more in-hospital deaths and are able to send more survivors straight home, rather than to a nursing facility, a new study shows. The study was conducted in more than 1,000 hospitals and published online Tuesday in the journal JAMA. It provides some of the best evidence that hospitals can hasten stroke care and get better results by adopting several key strategies. Those include getting alerts from ambulance workers when stroke patients are en route and speeding up brain scans, lab tests and medication mixing once patients arrive. Still, the study suggests such efforts can be for naught if patients show up too late to benefit from the medication – called tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Guidelines call for use within 4.5 hours of the first symptoms and within an hour of arrival at a hospital. The study is "more evidence that for stroke, every minute counts," says lead author Gregg Fonarow, a heart specialist at the University of California-Los Angeles. Researchers looked at 71,169 patients with ischemic strokes, the kind caused by blood clots. They compared those treated in the years 2003-2009 with those treated in 2010-2013 after the hospitals adopted an improvement program developed by groups including the American Stroke Association. Result: The share of tPA-treated patients who got the drug within an hour of arriving rose from 26% to 41% and reached 53% by the last months of the study. The median time elapsed fell from 77 minutes to 67 minutes. In-hospital deaths among the treated patients fell from 9.9% to 8.2%. More of them left the hospital able to walk (45.4% vs. 42.2%), and more went home to recover (42.7% vs. 37.6%). A possible complication, bleeding in the brain, affected fewer patients (4.6% vs. 5.6%). "From a public health standpoint, these are large differences," Fonarow says. "In the course of this study alone, thousands of lives were saved," and thousands more avoided costly nursing home care. Andrew Russman, a neurologist at Cleveland Clinic, one of the hospitals in the study, agrees: "You have to think about the number of people involved. There are 800,000 strokes a year, and 87% of them are ischemic strokes." Rapid, appropriate tPA treatment means "thousands more are able to walk" after those strokes, he says. An editorial accompanying the study says more research is needed to show the improvement programs are cost effective. James Grotta of the Memorial Hermann Hospital in Houston wrote that the study does build the case that improving stroke care means increasing treatment speed. Patients have a role to play, the experts say. In the new study, as in previous studies, most patients did not end up getting tPA at all – just 8.1% vs. 5.7% before the improvement programs began — and the "number one reason is that people don't arrive at the hospital on time," Russman says. Everyone should know the warning signs of stroke and act quickly if they experience them or see them in someone else, he says. "This isn't a wait and see situation," he says. "It's a call 911 and go straight to the emergency room situation."

The stroke association suggests remembering stroke signs with the word FAST, for:
•Face drooping – One side may droop or feel numb; smiles may be uneven.
•Arm weakness – One arm may be weak or numb.
•Speech difficulty – Speech may be slurred, and the person may have trouble repeating a simple sentence.
•Time to call 911 – if you see such signs. Also: check the time, so you know when the first symptoms appeared.

^ It seems like a no-brainer that the faster you treat someone (for anything) the better chances to survive they have. I didn't need a survey to tell me that. ^

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/22/hospital-stroke-study/8010493/

West's Back-Bone

From the DW:
"NATO should act now, not later"

NATO is waking up to the single most important lesson of history. Use a little force early to avoid the use of greater force later. Just think if that lesson had been learned before World War II, says Henry R. Nau. In Ukraine, a little force is being used early - but by only one side. Russia used a little force to occupy Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia, then to annex Crimea, and today to dominate the governance of eastern and perhaps the rest of Ukraine. While Europe and America can't believe what Russia is doing, Vladimir Putin is already using a little force early to address his next objective. Since 2009 Russia has doubled its military forces along its border with the Baltic states - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Meanwhile, President Barack Obama announces, at a White House news conference, that "military options are not on the table in Ukraine because this is not a situation that would be amenable to a military solution." Will that be the case too, if Russia beats the West to the use of a little force early in the Baltic states? Obama, who had no negotiating experience going into the Oval Office, is getting an education. Diplomacy is not a substitute for the use of force, to be used only if diplomacy fails. In fact, diplomacy will fail unless it is backed by force. And when negotiations fail, much more force is needed. Putin knows this. He sets up and surrounds his diplomacy by force. He doesn't want war. That's true. He wants to expand Russia's domain and influence peacefully. And he knows that the best way to do that is to use a little force first, especially when the United States is reluctant to use any force whatsoever after two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. So Putin expands defense spending in Russia by 79 percent over the past decade and plans to increase it by another 44 percent in the next three years. Kaliningrad bristles like "a giant aircraft carrier" with improved rapid reaction, long-range missiles and air defense capabilities. In addition Putin organizes paramilitary forces that can operate across borders with deniability to stage protests, disrupt stability and eventually call for Russian help to salvage the peace. He probes incessantly for military advantage and leverage - securing naval facilities and arming Assad in Syria, using Iran as a stalking horse in Iraq and Afghanistan, and expanding Russian influence in central Asia as America leaves Afghanistan. It is beyond credulity to blame NATO's expansion for Russia's actions. What conceivable threat did NATO pose when it expanded? It purposely kept ground forces out of the former Soviet satellite countries, made Russia a partner in the new NATO alliance, scuttled missile defenses that Russia opposed, and pushed arms control agreements that benefitted Russia - the Strategic Offensive Reduction Treaty (SORT) under Bush and New START Treaty under Obama.
Sure, weak and destabilized states like Georgia and Ukraine made mistakes. But big enough mistakes to threaten Russia? Now, the diplomacy-only advocates make the same arguments, especially in Europe. Don't rearm NATO. That will just provoke the Russians. Solve the problem diplomatically. But that kind of diplomacy, like the recent agreement in Geneva to deescalate the crisis, just buys time for the paramilitaries in Ukraine to complete their work by force. Because NATO failed to use a little force early, eastern and maybe the whole of Ukraine is lost today without a much greater use of force, which neither Europe nor America can stomach. But there is a chance that NATO can wake up and use a little force early in the NATO border countries that are next on Moscow's list. If it doesn't, NATO will face exactly the same problem of having to use much greater force later, and again perhaps not being able to stomach it. Under its resolute Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, NATO is considering moving ground forces into Romania, Poland and Latvia, increasing and upgrading the aircraft that patrol NATO's airspace, and resuming work on stalled missile defenses. For all the talk of sanctions and long-term energy alternatives, these military moves are the ones that really matter. What good does it do to reduce Europe's energy dependence on Russia after Russia effectively colonizes or "Belarussifies" Ukraine, Moldova, Poland or the Baltic states? At the same time, however, do not sever all day-to-day ties between NATO and Russia. Just as diplomacy does not substitute for force, resolute military actions do not substitute for diplomacy. Develop an off ramp for Russia, whether it wants it at the moment or not. Invite Moscow to observe military moves on NATO's side of the border if Russia reciprocates on its side of the border. Propose more joint ventures between Russian and western firms. Russia is light years behind China in modernizing and, with an economy totally dependent on energy and vulnerable to the next downturn of oil prices, needs more foreign investment. Encourage more exchanges of students, farmers and other civilian groups between Russia and western citizens to dampen the blatant anti-western propaganda Putin fulminates.
If Europe and the United States are unwilling to arm their diplomacy with small force now, they are condemned to use much greater force later, probably after they are attacked. Remember the Blitzkrieg and Pearl Harbor. History does not repeat itself but it rhymes.

^ This clearly shows the problem and what the West is refusing to do to fix things. Russia has no problems invading and occupying any region (ie Crimea, South Ossetia, Abkhazia) to promote their own interests and NATO, the US, EU, Canada, etc should do the same to counter these occupations. The politicians from the West talk tough, but have no back-bone to stand by their ultimatums and Russia and the rest of the world knows that. ^

http://www.dw.de/nato-should-act-now-not-later/a-17582668

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Potemkin Village

From the MT:
"U.S. Specialists Visit Moscow School for Disabled"

Tensions between Russia and the U.S. were eclipsed by colorful classrooms, abacuses and the gap-toothed smiles of first-graders during a visit of U.S. inclusive education specialists to a Moscow school for disabled children on Tuesday morning.  The visit was part of the U.S. State Department's Peer-to-Peer Dialogue Program, an initiative that supports the exchange of best practices between U.S. and Russian professionals in certain fields of interest. Three staff members of Boston's Institute for Human Centered Design teamed up with Perspektiva, a Moscow-based NGO that strives to improve the well-being of disabled people, to share experiences on providing the best possible care and facilities at Moscow's Special School No. 532. Despite contentious political issues between the two nations — including the current tensions over Ukraine, Russia's crackdown on NGOs receiving foreign funding and the country's ban on adoptions by U.S. citizens — the specialists said their visit had not been met with any negativity. "I do not think anybody has a problem with our presence in Russia," Willa Crolius, director of the user-expert laboratory and coordinator of public programs at the Institute for Human Centered Design, said during the visit. "We are just here to exchange [information] about education, about how to make the lives of our children better. We haven't felt the effect of politics at all since we've been here." Crolius' Russian interlocutors also seemed unmoved by the current tensions between Russia and the U.S. "We are an open organization," said Svetlana Kremneva, director of Moscow's Special School No. 532, which is solely funded by the Russian government. "We often share information with organizations from different countries. Some people are bothered by international politics, but we don't pay attention to any of this." A U.S.-funded visit of childcare and education specialists is the kind of initiative that generally infuriates the Kremlin. After passage of the 2012 Dima Yakovlev Act, forbidding the adoption of Russian children by U.S. citizens, Russian politicians made it clear that when it comes to raising Russian children, Russia knows best. And in 2012, Russia required all nongovernmental organizations to adopt the label "foreign agent" if they receive foreign funding and engage in any kind of "political" activity, severely narrowing the scope of the country's civil society. The director of Perspektiva, Denise Roza, said her organization was spared because Russian authorities did not deem its activities political. "Nothing we do is political," Roza said. "We still receive foreign funding but did not have to register as a 'foreign agent.' We work with people who are excited about their work and who are willing to listen and share their experiences. They don't try to impose their methods on others."
Perspektiva was funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development in the early 2000s, before Russia ordered the agency to cease its operations in the country in 2012. Russia had accused the agency of using its financial resources to influence Russian domestic politics, as well as the country's institutions. But the Peer-to-Peer Dialogue Program, which provides up to $100,000 to support joint projects between Russian and U.S. academic institutions and noncommercial organizations, remains afloat. Projects of the program's 2013 edition have included Russian-U.S. exchanges on the decommissioning of nuclear power plants, the prevention of human trafficking and the promotion of sustainable construction. Grigory Kuranov, a deputy of the Russian State Duma and member of the parliamentary Committee on Family, Women and Children, told The Moscow Times that the initiatives funded by the Peer-to-Peer Dialogue Program create an opportunity for Russia and the U.S. to "get to know each other better." "There is no doubt that there are tensions between our countries," Kuranov said. "But the countries are worthy of knowing each other, of trying to cooperate. Initiatives that work towards this objective are neither positive nor negative developments. They are necessary."

^ I think this shows the good partnership that Russia can have with other countries if they are willing to open-up more and follow international laws. It's clear that this school is only allowed this visit from the US not because they are not political  - because there are many such organizations in Russia that aren't political  - but because it is a Potemkin Village for Russia to show how it treats its disabled to the world. I have been to real disabled schools/institutions in Russia (away from the capital) and have seen how the ordinary Russian people as well as the Russian Government thinks of the disabled and how they treat them. I can only hope that what is happening in this school in Moscow will help to open Russia's view on the disabled and that it will change things for the disabled -  for the better -  all over the country. ^

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/us-specialists-visit-moscow-school-for-disabled/498740.html

Christian Call-Up

From Yahoo:
"Israel to send call-up papers to Christian Arabs"

Israel is to start sending call-up papers to all Christian Arabs of military service age, the army said Tuesday, angering Arab lawmakers who accused the government of seeking to divide Christians from Muslims. Military service will remain voluntary for Israel's 130,000 Christian Arabs as it is for its more than 1.3 million Muslim Arabs but only Christians will receive the call-up papers, an army spokesman said. "The IDF in coming weeks will begin to distribute to all potential Christian recruits voluntary enlistment forms," the spokesman said. "Since the service of the Christian population in Israel is not obligatory by law, potential recruits are not required to respond to the invitation." But commanders hope that the routine sending out of call-up papers will help boost the numbers volunteering from around 100 a year at present to 1,000, army radio reported. "Under these new arrangements, they will no longer have to submit their own enlistment request and expose themselves to potential pressure from their Christian coreligionists or from Muslims, who are overwhelmingly hostile to conscription," the radio said. The move came just two months after parliament approved a law giving Muslim and Christian Arabs separate representation on a national employment commission and drew fire from Arab lawmakers. Father Gabriel Nadaf, a Greek Orthodox priest from the northern city of Nazareth, welcomed the move by the military. "Young people in the Christian community need to understand the importance of serving and getting involved in the country in which they live and which protects them, and in which we are full citizens," he said.
Israel's Arab minority, which makes up some 20 percent of the population, are the descendants of the 160,000 Palestinians who remained on their land when Israel was created in 1948.
 
^ While I do think the Israelis are trying to separate the Arab Muslims from the Arab Christians I don't see why either the Muslims or the Christians don't serve in the Israeli military more. They are victim to the same bombings, attacks and invasions that the Jews are. You would think they would want to protect their homes and families. ^

http://news.yahoo.com/israel-send-call-papers-christian-arabs-183044765.html

Canada's Middle

From the Globe and Mail:
"Canada’s middle class now world’s richest, study suggests"

Canada’s middle class appears to be leading the rest of the developed world when it comes to income, a new study suggests. The in-depth report published today in The New York Times indicates that Canadians have bumped Americans out of the top spot they have long held.  “Middle-class incomes in Canada – substantially behind in 2000 – now appear to be higher than in the United States,” the report says. “Median income in Canada pulled into a tie with median United States income in 2010 and has most likely surpassed it since then,” it adds. The New York Times backs up its findings saying they’re based on 35 years of surveys and compiled by LIS, which runs the Luxembourg Income Study Database. The findings were also studied by LIS researchers, along with colleagues at a New York Times website, and outside economists. The findings show that median per-capita income among middle-class Canadians, after taxes, ranked with that of Americans in 2010 at shy of $20,000 (U.S.), though, as the report noted, has probably increased since. Even in 2010, Canada was ahead of Norway, the Netherlands, Britain, Germany, Sweden, France, Ireland and Spain. “Because the total bounty produced by the American economy has not been growing substantially faster here in recent decades than in Canada or Western Europe, most American workers are left receiving meager raises,” the report says. “Finally, governments in Canada and Western Europe take more aggressive steps to raise the take-home pay of low- and middle-income households by redistributing income.” It's a bit surprising to see Canada top the list, said chief economist Douglas Porter of BMO Nesbitt Burns, though he noted that commodity prices, and the Canadian dollar, were strong in 2010, and, of course, the country had an exceptional rebound from the global recession compared to most other countries. "And, historically, of course," Canada's going to be up there, in any event," he said. Median income in Canada has climbed by 19.7 per cent since 2000, according to the New York Times report, matching the pace in Britain, ahead of Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain and Germany, and far ahead of the meagre 0.3 per cent in the United States. Wealthy Americans, of course, still come out on top. According to BMO's Mr. Porter, the report offers some confirmation of what anecdotal and other evidence have suggested. "I would attribute some of this divergence to the much deeper recession the U.S. suffered through, especially on the employment front," he said.
"U.S. private sector employment finally recouped its recession losses in March, something Canada had accomplished about three years ago. And, payrolls in both U.S. manufacturing and construction are still down about 2 million jobs each from pre-recession levels, both industries that represent relatively well-paying, middle class jobs. In a nutshell, I believe that some of this weakening in the U.S. middle represents the lingering hangover of the most savage U.S. recession in the post-war era."
On top of that, he added, America's emphasis on "low taxes and low social support" oft means stronger income gains in good economic times, and soft incomes in poor times. According to Statistics Canada, median income in 2010 was just shy of $30,000 (Canadian), while median family income was $76,000. That, of course, masks the vast differences across the country and across income groups. Deputy chief economist Benjamin Tal of CIBC World Markets cited the widening income gap in the United States over the past 15 years, and, at a slower pace, in Canada, which he believes is a huge issue. “It is not that we are doing great (we are not), it is that the U.S. is doing much worse,” Mr. Tal said. “In my opinion, the widening income gap in the U.S. is the number one economic problem facing the U.S.” Given that, many manufacturers are now targeting the middle class in emerging economies as that group in America is a “shadow of its former self,” Mr. Tal added while warning about Canada, as well. “I do believe that the growing income gap in Canada is an important and a significant problem with real macro economic implications,” he said. “The debate about employment quality and skill mismatch is part of this picture. The fact that we are doing better than the U.S. does not mean that we have to relax about this issue. The opposite is the case.”
Average weekly earnings across the provinces rose last year to $910.74 from $894.71, lowest in Prince Edward Island at $753.58 and highest in Alberta at $1,108.01.

^ This is good for Canada's middle class. Not so much for everyone else. ^


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/top-business-stories/canadas-middle-class-now-worlds-richest-study-suggests/article18090490/

Lenin Love

From the MT:
"Lenin's Popularity Highest in Years on Revolutionary's 144th Birthday"



Support for the legacy of Bolshevik revolutionary Vladimir Lenin is on the rise, a poll published on the eve of the 144th anniversary of his birth showed. Asked what they thought about Lenin's contribution to Russian history, 38 percent of Russians said his influence had been "mostly positive."
The survey, conducted by the independent Levada Center pollster and published Monday, showed a steady increase in Lenin's popularity since 2006, when only 29 percent rated his influence as mostly positive. The figure had risen to 36 percent by 2012. In a corresponding trend, the number of people who see Lenin's contribution as "mostly negative" has dropped from 27 percent in 2006 to 21 percent this year. Those who saw his legacy as "completely negative" also declined, from 9 percent in 2006 to 5 percent this year. The number of Russians who rated Lenin's legacy as "entirely positive" has remained steady for the past two years, at 13 percent. Lenin played a key role in the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution and is widely considered to be the architect of the Soviet Union. The poll was conducted among 1,603 Russians from March 21-24 in 45 Russian regions. The margin of error was 3.4 percent.


^ This isn't surprising. Russian history is being rewritten and brought back in line with Soviet times - where Lenin was cherished as the Grandfather of the nation. It doesn't matter that people died because of him. People only seem to remember the good and not all the bad. The picture above is one I took in Lenin Square in Yaroslavl - every Russian city has a Lenin Square (and also a Soviet Square.) ^

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/lenins-popularity-highest-in-years-on-revolutionarys-144th-birthday/498708.html

Monday, April 21, 2014

Queen's 88th

From the BBC:
"Gun salutes to mark Queen's 88th birthday"

The Queen's 88th birthday has been marked across the UK with traditional gun salutes. A 41-gun royal salute was fired in Green Park in London and a 62 gun-salute from the Tower of London.
Gunners from 105th Regiment Royal Artillery fired two 21-gun royal salutes at Edinburgh and Stirling Castles. Salutes were also fired in Northern Ireland and Wales. The Queen is spending the day privately at Windsor. The Queen was born on 21 April 1926 at the home of her mother's parents in Mayfair. However, her birthday is also celebrated officially each year in June at the Trooping the Colour service - which this year will take place on 14 June.  The gun salute at Green Park was carried out by the King's Troop Royal Horse Artillery using 13-pounder World War One guns drawn by 71 horses.

Royal Salutes:

  • Gun salutes are fired as a sign of respect or welcome
  • The basic royal salute is 21 rounds; however, Royal Parks add an extra 20
  • The Tower of London fires the standard 21, then another 20 because it is a royal palace and then another 21 for "the City of London"
  • A total of 124 guns are fired at the Tower whenever Trooping The Colour coincides with the Duke of Edinburgh's birthday on 10 June
  • Other countries which carry out 21-gun salutes for royalty include Canada, Denmark and Sweden

Before the King's Troop arrived, the Band of the Honourable Artillery Company and Royal Yeomanry played celebratory music. The 62-shot salute at the Tower of London was completed by the Honourable Artillery Company. It included 21 shots for the Queen's birthday, 20 because it is a royal palace, and 21 to follow a tradition in which ships would fire their guns before entering the City of London to show they were not threatening. Gunners from 105th Regiment Royal Artillery fired two 21-gun royal salutes in Scotland; while in Wales, the salute was fired at Cardiff City Hall. The salute in Northern Ireland was carried out at Hillsborough Castle in County Down.

^ It's nice to see how a country remembers it's monarch/head of state. Queen Elizabeth 2 is Queen of:  the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Barbados, the Bahamas, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, and Saint Kitts and Nevis.  She is also one of the most beloved monarchs of all time. As a Canadian I am proud that she is my Queen. ^


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-27100517